Jump to content
Science Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

"The Perceptional Law establishes that the physical senses can perceive the physical universe in its present time only." No exceptions. (Carlos & Carlos Scientific Religious Research -Library of Congress Copyrights January 11, 2000)

 

In an era when technology is reaching great levels of success, also it is perceived that most of the scientific theories are falling in fantasies with incredible speeds.

 

Science is now a circus in where any clown can imagine his own dreams and using a calculator he can prove -in a piece of paper- that his idea/theory is plausible.

 

But, are you sure dear reader that everything that others say and prove in a piece of paper can be taken as based in reality? Which one rule in your life: reality or fantasy? Can you prove as correct the Last Theorem of Fermat using grains of rice? Then, are the mathematical results a valid evidence to prove and explain reality?

 

Reality is far away from those mathematical calculations when those calculations are based simply in ideas instead of observable events.

 

Since just a few years ago, the discovery of The Perceptional Law has been a great tool to discern what is reality and what is fantasy in our lives. Reality -in the physical world- is what exists. In base of reality the world progress, even when ideas are originated in the minds of people, you just can't imagine that you can breathe in outerspace as you do on Earth and establish that your imagination is more important than knowledge. By facts, your imaginary breathing in outerspace as you do inside the Earth's atmosphera is no more than a fantasy

and you must become a non-human being like Superman to be able to travel throughout space an survive without air...or the enviroment in outerspace must supply air to you by some cosmical event..or whatever.

 

But, it is established now that imagination is not more important than knowledge, even when those ideas and dreams have attachements of calculations, numbers, and symbols written in a piece of paper...unless your ignorance helps you to survive without air in outerspace.

 

The Percepional Law as a physics/psychology law, is a rule which subjects us into a limited and realistic universe. This law applies to the universal broad of beings and devices which can perceive. No exceptions are allowed inside the main rule of this law.

 

In the progressive explanation of this LOE, The Perceptional Law shall become the greatests law of all times.

 

Allow me to give you an example: Just "imagine" now that you can't perceive anything...even that you are existing now...you can't recognize your existence...you can't feel to yourself...you become void even when you are a physical reality...you can't even think...because knowledge shall run in your brain thanks to the open door of the senses to the universe inside and around you.

 

Then, in order to learn about the universe, the main key is to establish what is real and what is fantasy...what is an illusion and how to interpret it...what is the perception of existing means and what is hallucinations...

 

And, dear reader...most of the scientific theories today...are just fantasies.

 

And I will prove it with factual evidence.

Posted

The scientific method requiresof several steps to analyse and evaluate the events in front f us.

 

The scientific methods must be in accord to impartial research and with the required honesty by the researchers to come out with conclusions..even when those conclusions are not final.

 

What evidence is at hand to prove that time travels?...Maybe the use of clocks as devices able to measure the passage of time?

 

Dear readers, you will understand now that such fallacy of above is just a misunderstanding of reality.

 

Clocks are devices calibrated to a determinated functional work. Clocks are not connected directly or indirectly to any imaginary dimension of time.

 

Clocks are connected solely to their source of energy in order to provide a calibrated data to us.

 

Those are clocks, and nothing more than that. Clocks can't measure anything at all.

 

In case someone disagree with these statements, well, just search the journals, search the web and check if you can find those "hundreds and hundreds" of records of experiments made solely to prove that clocks can indeed measure the passage of time.

 

Please dear readers...do it...and welcome to reality...such tests have never been made: the idea of clocks as devices which can measure the passage of time is a fantasy.

 

The data provided by clocks is a calibrated reference based in the observation of the rotation of Earth. Also, today the atomic clocks are just the reference obtained by the observation of the natural vibration frequency of the atom of Caesium. So far, neither the rotation of Earth...neither the vibration frequency of an atom can be considered as an "extra physical dimension."

 

Then, the complete assumption that the theories of relativity have been proved correct by the malfunction of clocks when these devices are exposed to different enviroments...such assumption is just...a mere fantasy.

 

When atomic clocks are installed in a satellite, their calibrated functional work will be in accord ith other similar clocks located on Earth. But, as soon the satellite reach the outerspace, the matter of the clocks will suffer variations.

 

This is a common observation made with matter: mater is ALWAYS affected when is exposed to different enviroments. Those clocks in the satellites are freed from gravity, exposed to strongest cosmic rays, etc, etc... The matter of those clocks will suffer variations and clocks will malfunction.

 

The "light clock" suggested by Einstein was a ridiculous idea...so ridiculous that such clock never was able to be made and work. So, today, the followers of Einstein just cover up such stupidity and use the "atomic clocks" malfunction to try -in vain- to prove correct their theories.

 

But dear readers, we must talk about reality and not of fantasies in a science forum..so..if any of you can prove that clocks can measure the imaginary passage of time...welll, welcome...give your best...

 

The Perceptional Law is the way.

Posted

It is a common misinterpretation of an illusion of distance and movement which I like to demonstrate to you.

 

Lets use the example of the train and the clocks. Instead of light clocks (which never were made and every try ended in failures ) lets use atomic clocks which will provide data as a regular mechanical round clock.

 

The observer will stay in the train station looking at one stationary clock and also will observe the passing by train which will have a similar clock inside of it.

 

The "perception" of the observer will be that the clock inside the speeding train will run "slower" than the stationary clock in the wall of the train station.

 

Such, it is explained by many, as the dilatation of time inside the train by its fast motion against the "regular or standart" time speed of the train station itself.

 

Such idea is irrelevant. The answer is simple: the "distance" and "motion" between the two points (the observer and the observed) shall create an illusion by the following:

 

The psychologist J. F. Brown demonstrated several years ago that there is a lack of correspondence between the [real] velocity of the image moving across the retina and the perceived velocity just by increasing the distance between its moving dots and the observer.

 

Increasing the distance between those will decrease the visual angle through which the dots travel, and by consequence, it decreases the speed with which the dots move across the retina of the observer. In his tests, Brown found out that increasing the distance by a factor of 20 decreases the perceived velocity by less than a half.

 

Then, the assumed time dilatation and similar imaginary events which are common when someones spread out the imaginations of the theories of relativity...such dlatation of time is nothing but an illusion, because a large change in retinal velocity shall be in conjunction by only a small change in perceived velocity.

 

Using the example of the train, no only the clock will appear to run slow, but everything inside the train and the train itself will we perceived as running slowler as farther is the distance between the train and the observer.

 

By general information, we are exposed to tens, hundreds, even thousands of illusions everyday in our lives. Just the uprising of the Sun in the morning is a common illusion because in reality the Earth rotation is the cause of the event, and the Sun doesn't rise up or set in reference to planet Earth.

 

Like that, tens, hundreds, thousands of illusions trick the scientists, astronomers, etc, etc...everyday, at every moment.

 

Then, this is when The Perceptional Law helps a lot. When you analize and evaluate properly the phenomeon, your conclusions -if not final- shall go in accord with reality. Today, most of the scientits don't want to evaluate again their theories by accepting other possibilities which might contradict and discard their ideas. Maybe shame, maybe grants for research, etc... There are lots of reasons by which the scientists want those theories full of imaginations to stay in the "market" (great profit is made thanks to those fantasies).

 

But, none of those reasons are based in honesty and serious research.

 

According to the scientific method of research, all the possibilities should be investigated first..before accepting a theory as valid or worthy of being considered valid.. When the theories of relativity were accepted, the scientists didn't consider other possibilities as valid but what they wrongly interpreted from illusions.

 

Discovering the consequences from The Perceptional Law, I will have the delight to prove those scientists wrong...solely with factual evidence.

Posted

Dialogue from other forum:

 

<<SO,

You want to say that scientists are just creating fantasies.

You want to say that einstein, and before that, newton, created fantasies. >>

 

Yes, I have a child who can repeat a dialogue of a movie right after the first time seeing it. This boy of mine has symptoms of retardation, autism and attention deficit disoder (as found in Einstein when you check at his life), but, even when this boy is able to do so, he lives in a world of fantasies. Einstein had the same problem, he might was an individual with great abilities to play with equations and formulas, but his ideas were full of fantasies beacuse of his mental condition.

 

<<THen why does the newtonian theory predict the events observed on the earth with a remarkable degree of accuracy? >>

 

Newton made predictions in base of observations, and not so by imaginary events. Look at others from the same era of Newton, Halley for example, he used ancient records to predict the periodical path of a comet.

 

 

<<Is the path of a billiard ball predicted with exactness by it?

Are games also an illusion? Maybe nothing but the present time (as perceived by the brain) is an illusion?>>

 

As the quantum theory predicts, you can have lots of possible results, you can predict lots of posibilities, but never a repeated and exact result everytime. Go now to the macrocosmos...Is the rotation of Earth a fixed and exact rotation?...Of course no. Nothing repeats itself with exactness...nothing.

 

On the other hand, games are real infomation input in machines to be used as entertainment. You see events which are not real -like shootings, racing cars, etc) but those are able to create illusions -for example, you might feel the sensation in your estomach as if you are falling at full speed from a precipice, but all those sensations are created by illusions-.

 

 

<<We have a life, we have a mind that is curious, we have a world, a universe to discover. And if we set about discovering it, are we wrong?>>

 

No, nothing wrong with that. What is wrong is to establish as real something which is nothing but a mere imagination. Right now, several people believe that time traveling is possible...such belief is based in fantasies...nothing real. Several people call as an extra-dimension to a phenomenon or event which is beyond their understanding or simply thanks to their misinterpretation of reality.

 

 

<<If all we want to want to do is understand the universe, understand why we are endowed with life, why and how we were created, are we wrong? >>

 

Of course no. I myself am working and doing research to find out the answer to those questions. The situation here is to establish first what is real and what is not in oder to follow the right path. You can't answer those questions of yours just by creating imaginary events...

 

 

<<I believe it to be the right of curious creatures to investigate and discover, even 'fantasise', and the duty of less curious ones to develop that essential quality in themselves, because we have been created for some reason, and certainly not for sulking from the truth and calling everything an illusion ! >>

 

 

What I can reply to your belief is that right now "no one", listen carefuly, no one can challenge The Perceptional Law presenting factual evidence. Neither the best universities, neither the best institutions of science, neither NASA, no one can do it.

 

Why?...Because when you find a truth..fantasies are over.

 

So, I truly suggest you to research deeply in the current thories of science to find out their primeval roots...you will find -as I did- that their base foundation is not valid to be considered as scientific. For example, there is nothing scientific inside the idea that clocks can measure the passage of time. Nothing at all.

 

Reasearch. If you are really an individual looking for answers, you must start with a solid foundation. Don't follow the belief of multitudes, remember th

Posted

First of all: You already had two threads on this, why the need to create yet another? Second, you again put this in Physics and Mathematics, I've moved it here where it belongs for you. And third, is your second post not the exact same thing as one of your post in another thread

 

http://www.hypography.com/forums/messageview.cfm?catid=23&threadid=267

 

Perhaps you would like to read the rules here:

 

http://www.hypography.com/forums/messageview.cfm?catid=9&threadid=213

 

Flaming of users, inappropriate language, and spamming (posting a link just to get traffic at a site, and/or posting a useless post.) will NOT be tolerated, and will promptly be deleted.

 

Thanks

 

Noah

Posted

Yes - I agree with Noah.

 

This is a warning to carlosncarlos: If you post your thread again you will be denied posting rights in these forums.

 

If you would like to remain a member, please participate in our general discussion and stop wasting our space and time.

 

Tormod

  • 3 months later...
Posted

I believe that many things in life and/or science that we consider real and/or factual..is just an illusion, just a perception. To get to the core of some things is impossible because there is so many other things you have to consider and study first. To really explain reality i think is a ridiculous notionesp. if you generalise it in one theory. Generalisations are mainly expressed when the individual is too lazy, that is why they need something to sum everything up to make it easy for themselves. Generalisations are ussually supported ussually by not very many examples; not everything is considered, which is the main reason generalisations esp. big generalisation such as "what is reality, fact.. ect " always have errors. You say that time dilation is an illusion, have you ever even looked at more examples other than the train one, which i can see ur point in, what about moun decay.Muon decay, illustrates the dilation of time in a moving object. This occurs in the decay of unstable elementary particles called muons. These particles are created high in the atmosphere by fast cosmic-ray particles arriving at the earth from space. Muons have a speed of 0.998c, their lifetime is 0.000002 sec, therefore they can only travel only 600m.However, they are created at altitudes more than ten times greater than this. If we use the Lorentz contraction formula we can see that in our reference frame they have traveled 9500m.And because in the muons frame of reference it only takes 600m to reach the ground and in our reference frame it seems like it has travelled 9500m to us it seems that its lifetime has been extended.Since Muons travel at such high speeds they are able to dilate there lifetime and/or contract the lenght for them to reach ground level, otherwise they wouldent be able to reach sea level at profusion. This proves time dilation. If u want it to be called time dilation, it is really decay dilation..since time is only man made concept to measure the gradual decay.

 

But wheather you call it time dilation or decay dilation it doesn't matter, the point is it proves the theory of relativity.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...