Little Bang Posted August 24, 2010 Report Posted August 24, 2010 If an observer is stationary WRT to an electron 50mm away could he even be aware of the electron? Quote
Little Bang Posted August 24, 2010 Author Report Posted August 24, 2010 Since the electron is a point particle could a very tiny observer get as close as say 10^-10m? Hqas anyone seen this? http://www.electronspin.org/electron.pdf Quote
erKa Posted August 25, 2010 Report Posted August 25, 2010 Since the electron is a point particle could a very tiny observer get as close as say 10^-10m? Hqas anyone seen this? http://www.electronspin.org/electron.pdfwhat do you mean as "close view"? ...you cannot watch objects less than 10^-10m (1 angstrom) by way of indetermination principle. Curiously 5 cm are 5*10^+8 Angstroms so the solid angle visible at 5 cm of a spot having diameter 1 angstrom is alfa = arctan 1/(5*10^+8)= arctan (2*10^-9)= 2*10^-9 Rad or 1.27324*10^-7 Dec.degree. :lol: In the fictional sky of your nano-observer such spot fulfilled of your electron is like a very small star in the night sky over ISS... pratically not yet visible without any further magnification :mellow: This is not a "close view" indeed. Quote
Qfwfq Posted August 25, 2010 Report Posted August 25, 2010 If an observer is stationary WRT to an electron 50mm away could he even be aware of the electron?It would be exceedingly difficult for a macroscopic contraption to distinguish the field of the single electron at 50mm from its own fields. If we consider instead another charged particle at that distance, they will both have a slight acceleration but it can't realistically have a smaller mass so the initially stationary electron will get at least as great an effect. No doubt you can shoot a particle to [imath]10^{-10}[/imath] but, if it is charged, by that point the field will be very appreciable and they will both be deflected. The ideal best thing would be a tiny electric dipole moment but I don't know of any existing object that suits this purpose; classically it would be subject to a torque. In any case, at that distance scale it would be fictuous to consider them stationary even if one is neutral, so you might as well send in a neutron and reason on the effect on the moving magnetic dipole moment (which is easier if you view it as electron going past neutron). Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.