Theory Of A Dodecahedron Shaped Universe *intelligent Design*

[Guilla]

What I am about to discuss is for people who have open minds. It is not for the selective skeptics and those who blindly and unquestioningly follow the dogmas of the scientific mainstream.

 

In a scientific research in 2003 there was discovered evidence for the age-old theory that the Universe is finite and a Dodecahedron (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodecahedron):

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/18368

“The standard model of cosmology predicts that the universe is infinite and flat. However, cosmologists in France and the US are now suggesting that space could be finite and shaped like a dodecahedron instead. They claim that a universe with the same shape as the twelve-sided polygon can explain measurements of the cosmic microwave background – the radiation left over from the big bang – that spaces with more mundane shapes cannot (J-P Luminet et al. 2003 Nature 425 593).”

 

 

Yet this scientific research fell on deaf ears in the mainstream scientific community. Why is there no credibility given to this research?

 

For centuries, nearly everyone believed that the Earth was the centre of the solar system because of the theory of a geocentric Earth that had been postulated by the academics and scientists.

 

Not only did academics accept Ptolemy’s model, but the Church also demanded adherence to a geocentric theory. Then Copernicus demonstrated clearly that the Earth revolved around the sun, and not the other way around. Kepler refined the work of Copernicus by changing his proposed circular orbits into elliptical orbits. Copernicus and Kepler laboured under secular and religious persecution whilst facing scorn and ridicule from many of their colleagues.

 

As stated earlier, this is an age-old theory, which can be seen in Plato’s Timaeus dialogue, written circa 360 BC. How did Plato know this? Was it Divine inspiration?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timaeus_%28dialogue%29

“Further, Plato posits the existence of a fifth element (corresponding to the fifth remaining Platonic solid, the dodecahedron) called aether, of which the cosmos itself is made.”

 

 

Johannes Kepler was very interested in the five platonic solids, and he even developed a Platonic solid model of the Solar system:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kepler-solar-system-1.png

 

Today, Kepler would be ridiculed by most scientists because of his belief in Intelligent Design and a connection between the physical and spiritual. The majority of the scientific community would be ridiculing the person who was a key element in the scientific revolution and who formulated the laws known as Kepler’s laws of planetary motion.

 

Kepler had great respect for the spiritual, and had great interest in discovering a geometrical plan for the universe:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johannes_Kepler

“Kepler also incorporated religious arguments and reasoning into his work, motivated by the religious conviction that God had created the world according to an intelligible plan that is accessible through the natural light of reason.”

 

“Kepler thought he had revealed God’s geometrical plan for the universe. Much of Kepler’s enthusiasm for the Copernican system stemmed from his theological convictions about the connection between the physical and the spiritual;”

 

“Though the details would be modified in light of his later work, Kepler never relinquished the Platonist polyhedral-spherist cosmology of Mysterium Cosmographicum.”

 

“Kepler was convinced "that the geometrical things have provided the Creator with the model for decorating the whole world."”

 

“Kepler began by exploring regular polygons and regular solids, including the figures that would come to be known as Kepler's solids.”

 

 

 

At the present time there is a researcher named Dr. Amitakh Stanford who has the same fascination as Johannes Kepler - regarding the five platonic solids, the belief in Intelligent Design and a geometrical plan for the universe. Dr. Amitakh Stanford is also a proponent of the theory of a Dodecahedron shaped Multiverse. Here are a some quotes of her work that are most interesting for this discussion:

 

http://www.flyingbuffaloes7.net/keluar10.html

“My view of the universe differs considerably from the generally accepted scientific dogma. I propound that symmetrical solids are the building blocks of all matter and every universe. The symmetrical solids are firm and stable in shape but not actually solid; they are instead hollow. These solids are then spun very rapidly, making them appear to be spheres, when in fact they are tetrahedrons, hexahedrons, octahedrons, dodecahedrons and icosahedrons. I understand that my theory would be deemed implausible by scientists who perceive existence as being a cosmic accident, devoid of any Intelligent Design.”

 

http://www.xeeatwelve.com/articles/twelve_universes_pentagons.html

“The "parallel" universes are those that are on opposite positions of the Universal Dodecahedron.”

 

http://www.xeeatwelve.net/articles/twelve_universes.html

“Universes are relatively flat pentagons. Every universe has its own multitude of dimensions contained within its borders. There are only twelve universes. Darkness connected these twelve universes together and formed the Universal Dodecahedron. The Universal Dodecahedron was set into motion and also spins "perpetually". It also appears to be a sphere because of its rapid motion. “

 

One should also consider that all the planets in the solar system except Pluto (which many still claim is NOT a planet) fit onto a single plane, and all orbit the equator of the sun:

http://canng.com/articles/twelve_universes.html

”I have written earlier that solar systems are on planes because the planets could get caught in the vortex of the suns if their orbits deviated too much from the plane. This is only part of the reason. Another reason is that Darkness devised the physical and astral worlds to sit atop planes. That is, It used a two dimensional model. This is for ease of maintenance and also well suited for Darkness' nefarious purposes.”

 

 

Science is now trying to prove itself by its own scientific method, a method it developed to prove its own worth. That is, science has developed a system to support its own theories and methods. If a thing is scientifically proven, it is supposedly proven beyond all doubt. It is this model, and this alone, that is accepted as valid and credible in the “informed” world today. Philosophy, religion and metaphysics must all take a back seat to the belief in Science. For far too long, the scientific community has been pulling the wool over our eyes, but they cannot keep up this game much longer.

[Turtle]

What I am about to discuss is for people who have open minds. It is not for the selective skeptics and those who blindly and unquestioningly follow the dogmas of the scientific mainstream.

 

In a scientific research in 2003 there was discovered evidence for the age-old theory that the Universe is finite and a Dodecahedron

...

For far too long, the scientific community has been pulling the wool over our eyes, but they cannot keep up this game much longer.

 

gee; this being a science site, why did you even bother us? :doh:

 

anyway, you might consider another visionary view on the geometric shape of Universe where it is shown that it is Vector Equilibriumate, not dodecahedral.

Synergetics (boldenation mine.)

...Likewise considered, a dodecahedron may not be a cognizable entity-integrity, or be rememberable or recognizable as a regenerative entity, unless it is omnistabilized by omnitriangulation of its systematic subdivision of all Universe into either and both insideness and outsideness, with a small remainder of Universe to be discretely invested into the system-entity's structural integrity. No energy action in Universe would bring about a blackboard-suggested pentagonal necklace, let alone 12 pentagons collected edge to edge to superficially outline a dodecahedron. The dodecahedron is a demonstrable entity only when its 12 pentagonal faces are subdivided into five triangles, each of which is formed by introducing into each pentagon five struts radiating unitedly from the pentagons' centers to their five comer vertexes, of which vertexes the dodecahedron has 20 in all, to whose number when structurally stabilized must be added the 12 new pentagonal center vertexes. This gives the minimally, nonredundantly structural dodecahedron 32 vertexes, 60 faces, and 90 strut lines. In the same way, a structural cube has 12 triangular vertexes, 8 faces, and 18 linear struts.

615.06 The vector equilibrium may not be referred to as a stabilized structure except when six struts are inserted as diagonal triangulators in its six square faces, wherefore the topological description of the vector equilibrium always must be 12 vertexes, 20 (triangular) faces, and 30 linear struts, which is also the topological description of the icosahedron, which is exactly what the six triangulating diagonals that have hypotenusal diagonal vectors longer than the square edge vectors bring about when their greater force shrinks them to equilength with the other 24 edge struts. This interlinkage transforms the vector equilibrium's complex symmetry of six squares and eight equiangled triangles into the simplex symmetry of the icosahedron. ...

 

here's a thread i started on bucky's tome: >> Synergetics: Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking it's babbleicious!

 

a quote from buddha:

Words do not express thoughts very well; everything immediately becomes a little different, a little distorted, a little foolish. And yet, it also pleases me and seems right that what is of value and wisdom to one man seems nonsense to another.