Magnetism

[Eduffy80911]

Magnetism is aether flow in above normal concentration. A magnetite crystal exchanges electrons in a manner that constitutes an electric current. This produces a magnetic field or aether flow perpendicular to the current. The current acts like a fan blade, drawing in aether at one end (pole) and pushing it out the other. Because metal is less porous (a denser configuration of matter) with respect to aether than other materials it is drawn in or pushed away by the flow depending on which end its placed by. A magnet therefore could be called an aether pump. Aether is pervasive which means it exists wherever it fits, including the space between sub-atomic particles. A gradual density gradient results in gravity, a more pronounced wave of aether gives us magnetism. A sudden linear burst of high pressure results in plasma discharge. More at DynamicTensegrity.com.

[Turtle]

___I have read some little bit on tensegrity structures; wasn't it Buckminster Fuller that did of lot of wok on them?

___Welcome to Hypography.

[Eduffy80911]

Yes, in fact I quoted Mr. Fuller in the margin - Bucky's Mandate: "If the truth is known, tell it, and tell it right now!" <p>

The "Tensegrity" in Dynamic Tensegrity comes from the continuous pull (convergent force) of the much more pervasive aether (roughly 9-1 in terms of mass) against the discontiuous push (divergent force) of the slower, less pervasive matter. The "pull" is really a pushing in from all sides which has the same net effect as a pull from the center.

The 9-1 ratio comes from the amount of "missing matter" or "dark energy" that is said to exist in the galaxy. If the ratio is the same on smaller scales, each bit of matter is really an aether/matter system in which the aether is the driver, the matter is just along for the ride. Aether/matter systems like anything else, move from high pressure to low pressure. The more densely packed the matter, the lower the aether pressure within. Matter is not attracted to matter. Relatively high pressure aether systems are attracted to relatively low pressure aether systems.

[UncleAl]

Magnetism is aether flow in above normal concentration.

 

[edit]derogatory content removed[/edit]

 

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare.swf

 

Magnetism is net spin. You can take your choice of flowing current, polarized electron spins, or polarized electron angular momenta.

 

Michelson-Morley showed no aether to 10^(-8) 1887, and today no aether to to 1.7x10^(-15).

 

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)

http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml

No aether

 

Phys. Rev. Lett. 88(1) 010401 (2002)

Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 060403 (2003)

Phys. Rev. Lett. 42(9) 549 (1979)

Phys. Bull. 21 255 (1970)

Europhysics Lett. 56(2) 170 (2001)

Gen. Rel. Grav. 34(9) 1371 (2002)

 

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/

http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7

No Lorentz violation

 

Google

Kennedy-Thorndike 538 hits

Ives-Stilwell 114 hits

Hughes-Drever 1120 hits

 

Uncle Al says, "Education: that which discloses to the wise and disguises from the foolish their lack of understanding. Mystics are baffled by the obvious yet possess a complete understanding of the nonexistent."

[Turtle]

GETE :rant: Talk about your tensegrity structure! :rant: By what standard may the wise rest but the foolish, & by what standard may the foolish rise but the wise. Unless maybe we reinvoke magnetism & the theorized monopole.

___I have to invoke Bucky again; he said "death is the as yet inexperienced lower frequencys". :eek:

[infamous]

[Posted by UNcle Al]

Bloviating jackass. You are offensive to any educated person.

 

No need to be so harsh Uncle Al.

[C1ay]

Magnetism is aether flow in above normal concentration. A magnetite crystal exchanges electrons in a manner that constitutes an electric current. This produces a magnetic field or aether flow perpendicular to the current. The current acts like a fan blade, drawing in aether at one end (pole) and pushing it out the other. Because metal is less porous (a denser configuration of matter) with respect to aether than other materials it is drawn in or pushed away by the flow depending on which end its placed by. A magnet therefore could be called an aether pump. Aether is pervasive which means it exists wherever it fits, including the space between sub-atomic particles. A gradual density gradient results in gravity, a more pronounced wave of aether gives us magnetism. A sudden linear burst of high pressure results in plasma discharge. More at DynamicTensegrity.com.

Neither here or DynamicTensegrity.com seems to have any scientific proof for such a claim. What can you show to prove the existence of this aether that our forefathers discarded more than a century ago? On it's face this looks like a candidate for the Strange Claims Forum.

[infamous]

Neither here or DynamicTensegrity.com seems to have any scientific proof for such a claim. What can you show to prove the existence of this aether that our forefathers discarded more than a century ago? On it's face this looks like a candidate for the Strange Claims Forum.

 

Greetings C1ay; If you have an interest, there has been some experimentation done by Webster Kehr. I have read most of his results and quite frankly, I'm starting to question our current view on gravitational theory. Google this; (pages.sbcglobal.net/webster.kehr/),I think you will find it very interesting.

[Eduffy80911]

If the space between galaxies is occupied by mostly nothing, what is the difference between 1 cubic foot of nothing and 100 cubic light years of nothing? Would one cubic foot of nothing be more dense since it is the same amount of stuff (none) in a smaller volume? Here's an experiment that might be a proof, which I don't have the resources to perform. Perhaps you know someone that does. Consider a vacuum created in a laboratory. If a vacuum is what I suspect, a space in which all or most of the matter has been removed leaving only aether, the aether that displaces the matter must enter through the walls of the container. A container that is less porous with respect to aether (a more dense configuration of matter) should be harder to create a vacuum in that one that is more porous with respect to aether. Compare the energy required to create identicle vacuum pressure in containers made of various materials from metal to acrylic. If there is a difference, the likely reason is the difference in porosity of the material with respect to aether.

[C1ay]

Why does all space have to be occupied with something? Is there some natural property that states space cannot exist with nothing in it? Is has always been my view that is what space is, the void, nothing, no matter and no energy.

[Eduffy80911]

why would it take photon or anything else any longer to cross light years of nothing than one foot of nothing? If there were really nothing between you and your destination, you'd be there.

[C1ay]

why would it take photon or anything else any longer to cross light years of nothing than one foot of nothing? If there were really nothing between you and your destination, you'd be there.

Distance. The speed of light, c = 299 792 458 m/s, is based on the vacuum of space. Other media does indeed have an affect on the speed of light but the absence of everything does not make it's speed instantaneous.

[Eduffy80911]

How can you have distance between two points with nothing in between them? It's the vacuum of space that I'm proposing is the aether (or ether if you'd rather), It's pervasive which means it exists wherever it fits, including the space between subatomic particles. The model I've posted at dynamictensegrity.com is written so that the average sixth grader could get his or her head around it. The work of Webster Kehr (which I just found through this forum) is much more sophisticated and might be more to your liking: Google this; pages.sbcglobal.net/webster.kehr/

[C1ay]

How can you have distance between two points with nothing in between them? It's the vacuum of space that I'm proposing is the aether (or ether if you'd rather), It's pervasive which means it exists wherever it fits, including the space between subatomic particles. The model I've posted at dynamictensegrity.com is written so that the average sixth grader could get his or her head around it. The work of Webster Kehr (which I just found through this forum) is much more sophisticated and might be more to your liking: Google this; pages.sbcglobal.net/webster.kehr/

Does this aether consist of something? Some kind of atoms or particles. There is no need to call a void anything but a void.

[infamous]

How can you have distance between two points with nothing in between them? It's the vacuum of space that I'm proposing is the aether (or ether if you'd rather), It's pervasive which means it exists wherever it fits, including the space between subatomic particles. The model I've posted at dynamictensegrity.com is written so that the average sixth grader could get his or her head around it. The work of Webster Kehr (which I just found through this forum) is much more sophisticated and might be more to your liking: Google this; pages.sbcglobal.net/webster.kehr/

 

Thanks for bringing this to everyones attention as I posted this information in post #8 of this thread. I'm still not convinced with regard to the existence of an aether, I do find however, the experiments preformed by Webster Kehr to be very interesting. Either there is something to this idea of aether or we need to reconsider how to explain these experiments in a way that rationalizes them with Relativity. I believe it would be inexcusable to simply dismiss this evidence because it does'nt quite fit in with the standard model. This evidence deserves an honest investigation.

[infamous]

Does this aether consist of something? Some kind of atoms or particles. There is no need to call a void anything but a void.

 

Scientists are still trying to understand why we can't observe the socalled dark matter that must exist for our understanding of the universe to be correct. This (dark matter, dark energy) might be responsible for the medium some refer to as aether. I'm personally not convinced that an aether exists, but Webster Kehr has preformed many valid experiments which beg much more investigation.

[C1ay]

Scientists are still trying to understand why we can't observe the socalled dark matter that must exist for our understanding of the universe to be correct. This (dark matter, dark energy) might be responsible for the medium some refer to as aether. I'm personally not convinced that an aether exists, but Webster Kehr has preformed many valid experiments which beg much more investigation.

I don't believe in any aether either but I do believe there is probably plenty of dark matter out there.