Earth's gravity scar

[C1ay]

A new ESA study predicts that the devastating Sumatran earthquake, which resulted in the tragic tsunami of 26 December 2004, will have left a 'scar' on Earth's gravity that could be detected by a sensitive new satellite, due for launch next year.

 

lefthttp://hypography.com/gallery/files/9/9/8/earths_geoid_thumb.jpg[/img]The Sumatran earthquake measured 9 on the Richter scale and caused widespread devastation and death when it struck unexpectedly late last year. Thankfully, earthquakes of this magnitude are rare events, taking place perhaps once every two decades.

 

It may seem surprising that Earth's gravity is not equally strong at all points of the globe. Instead, it varies by a small fraction due to the presence of such things as mountains or deep ocean trenches. The tides and ocean circulation patterns also affect the gravity, as does the rotation of the Earth itself, which bulges out the planet's equator and makes its diameter 21 kilometres wider than the pole-to-pole distance.

 

righthttp://hypography.com/gallery/files/9/9/8/figure2_Hires_thumb.jpg[/img]Seismological data suggests that, during the event, the seafloor on either side of a fault line running for 1000 km along the bottom of the Indian Ocean dramatically changed height, producing a ledge, 6 metres high. Such a large-scale movement will change the gravitational field of the Earth. Roberto Sabadini and Giorgio Dalla Via, University of Milan, and colleagues have calculated this change. They found that the Earth's gravity altered, in an instant, by as much as is expected from six years' worth of melting at the Patagonian Ice Fields in southernmost South America.

 

In order to measure the deviations from the average level of gravity, Earth scientists invented the concept of the geoid. This is a bit like a hi-tech version of 'sea level', which is often used to give an absolute height measure. Today's modern measurements need something more accurate, however.

 

The geoid is a hypothetical surface, on which the gravitational pull of the Earth is the same everywhere. It wraps itself around the Earth, moving away from the real surface when it is over areas of greater density and therefore stronger gravity. Over less dense regions, the geoid moves closer to the real surface.

 

When material is moved around, either instantaneously in an earthquake or gradually as in a melting ice field, the Earth's gravity in the local region changes and so does the height of the geoid. In the Sumatran earthquake, Sabadini and Dalla Via found that the total geoid movement was some 18 mm - a lot for a geoid!

 

lefthttp://hypography.com/gallery/files/9/9/8/C7_1_B_thumb.jpg[/img]ESA's Gravity Field and Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) is designed to sensitively investigate the gravitational field of the Earth from orbit. As the spacecraft passes over regions of stronger and weaker gravitational pull, it will bob up and down. Such deviations are far below the perceptible limits of humans but GOCE is equipped with a device called a gradiometer than can detect these ultra-subtle differences. By measuring the deviations in the geoid, scientists can gain a unique window into our planet.

 

"This work is at the frontier of geophysics and the perfect complement to seismology," says Sabadini, "Seismology is good for detecting the slip of earthquake faults and the location of the epicentre, geoid monitoring can determine how much mass is actually being moved around."

 

It can also be used in the quest to understand climate change as ocean circulation also affects the geoid. Changes in climate, which in turn affect the ocean circulation pattern, will show up as a yearly change in the geoid. With so much to offer, the GOCE satellite is scheduled to launch in 2006. A paper on the Sumatran Earthquake by Roberto Sabadini, Giorgio Dalla Via, Masja Hoogland, Abdelkrim Aoudia is published in EOS, the journal of the American Geophysical Union.

 

Source: ESA

[Turtle]

___I wonder if they can still garner any similar data for the 1964 Alaska 9.+ quake? Moreover, how many such quakes have have 'scared' Earth in her long history?

___Good article C1ay! :eek:

[C1ay]

___I wonder if they can still garner any similar data for the 1964 Alaska 9.+ quake? Moreover, how many such quakes have have 'scared' Earth in her long history?

___Good article C1ay! :eek:

I doubt we have as accurate a geologic map for the era as we have now. Satellite mapping and GPS services have changed the resolution and accuracy of our mapping abilities to levels we never had before. At least we have the technology to make these records going forward.

[Turtle]

___I used to have a Bougueir(sp) Gravity Anomoly map of SW Washington I used when I was prospecting; available from the USGS for a few bucks. As I recall though, the data was from the 60's. Maybe time for some new flights?

[C1ay]

___I used to have a Bougueir(sp) Gravity Anomoly map of SW Washington I used when I was prospecting; available from the USGS for a few bucks. As I recall though, the data was from the 60's. Maybe time for some new flights?

Did it really help to find anything? I had a friend that asked me to digitize some old geological survey map he had for the same reason, prospecting, but he hasn't found anything to speak of. The old map he had was kind of neat because it was from the late 50's and there were far fewer roads in the area. Because so many of the landmarks from the era didn't mean muchh anymore he had me overlay the current roads and waterways on his old map that supposedly showed where the gold veins run here.

[Turtle]

Oh yes indeedy I found gold; platinum too. Not because of the gravity map, but rather historical documents & plain old going out & prospecting. The problem is, the gold is all in the form of dust or flour, ie. no nuggets, no flakes, no nothing to see with the naked eye. Further, it is not there is sufficient quantity to make it worth the effort to mine it. I was placer mining by the way, but I did find the hardrock source. Not only gold throughout, but a cornucopia of semiprecious stones including agate, drusey quartz, & jasper.

___In general, the gravity anomoly maps lack sufficient resolution of gradient for locating gold specifically.

[rockytriton]

We've got to save the environment, we must get the help of the EPA to put an end to gravity!

[C1ay]

but I did find the hardrock source.

Most of the gold in Georgia is in hard rock, mostly granite. It takes more work and energy that it yields. Nature erodes a little into streams for panning but I wouldn't recomend anyone try to do it for a living here either.