Day Agent Posted January 30, 2011 Report Posted January 30, 2011 I've been wondering about the likelihood of infinite universes. Not in alternate realities, but in the same one.Isn't it more likely, that big bangs are no more than supernovae, on a larger scale? And no more unique?Why shouldn't there be more universes, all around, in infinite space? Quote
LaurieAG Posted February 2, 2011 Report Posted February 2, 2011 Hi Day Agent, I've been wondering about the likelihood of infinite universes. Not in alternate realities, but in the same one.Isn't it more likely, that big bangs are no more than supernovae, on a larger scale? And no more unique?Why shouldn't there be more universes, all around, in infinite space? It works if you describe a universal boundary as the point where the center of mass of that 'universe' exerts no influence on mass just past the boundary. Quote
Day Agent Posted February 3, 2011 Author Report Posted February 3, 2011 Hi Day Agent, It works if you describe a universal boundary as the point where the center of mass of that 'universe' exerts no influence on mass just past the boundary. LaurieAG, it seems the term 'universe' inherently encompasses everything. Are there any terms that refer only to the ejecta of a big bang?A cosmic volume, perhaps? Quote
dduckwessel Posted February 3, 2011 Report Posted February 3, 2011 According to Quantum Physics the universe is holographic - multi-universes are evidence the hologram is 'multi-layered' or 'multi-dimentional'. Where did it come from? Something suddenly produced 'the big bang hologram' - I believe it was the 'negative' outcome of something else (like it's hiding something). I think the universe is a form of water - apparently the result of 'someting gone wrong'. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.