Queso Posted October 25, 2007 Report Posted October 25, 2007 Could be. But geek that I am, I was really asking a Geometry question.... Keeping the speed real slow, In any case I set my own pace by stealing the show, :phones:Buffy I think alignments make harmony out of geometrical space, regardless of the perspective used to observe it. Quote
Queso Posted October 25, 2007 Report Posted October 25, 2007 Is the proper term synchronized? I've never found any meaning in alignments other than how they show the big shapes. (And you know, seasons)Time works. Quote
Queso Posted October 25, 2007 Report Posted October 25, 2007 Graham Hancock talks about the maya, 2012, a 40 year window, december 21 2012, possibilities, the heavens, etc. sheds light on the matter. YouTube - Graham Hancock Pt.3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOPOp2Lnkxc He said that the sun will rise in the center of the milky way galaxy in 2012.It's just a symbol of rebirth. Quote
tmaromine Posted October 25, 2007 Report Posted October 25, 2007 Our sun'll rise in the centre of our galaxy ? So what'll happen to our current excentral sun ? Or did you mean that that phrase is just a symbol itself, not the sun literally coming out of the galaxy's centre ? For those who think some thing will occur in 2012, nothing better not occur or it'll be another "We told you so" to the one's who take the universe with much speciality. But then, some thing paranormal could occur, and I think I'd like to see it. Just seems unlikely. Quote
DougF Posted October 25, 2007 Report Posted October 25, 2007 What's going to happen on December 21st 2012? This site should answer some of your questions.(me I think its going to rain) There are however a lot of theories knocking around the Internet which use the end of this calendar cycle to predict the end of the world. They often also mention the fact that Dec 21st is the winter solstice' date=' and that the Sun on the solstice that year is "aligned" with the plane of the galaxy. On the winter solstice, the Sun always has a Declination of -23.5 degrees, and a Right Ascension of 18 hours, but exactly where this is on the sky relative to more distant stars changes very slowly due to the "precession of the equinoxes". We have a posted answer explaining this effect but how it's important in this answer (and how it was first noticed) is by the fact that it moves the position of the equinoxes, and solstices with a period of 26,000 years in a complete circle around the sky westward along the ecliptic. So the position of the winter solstice moves 360 degrees in 26,000 years. That means that it moves 360/26000 = 0.01 degrees a year. Defining an exact boundary for the plane of the Milky Way is tough, but it's at least 10-20 degrees wide across much of the sky, meaning that the solstice can be described as being "in the plane of the Milky Way" for 700-1400 years! To put it another way, the winter solstice that just past (2005) was only 0.1 degrees away from where it will be in 2012, a distance smaller than the size of the Sun itself (which is about 0.5 degrees in diameter). In any case the Sun crosses the plane of the Galaxy twice every year as we orbit around it, with no ill effect on Earth. [/quote'] Curious About Astronomy: What's going to happen on December 21st 2012? Quote
Queso Posted October 25, 2007 Report Posted October 25, 2007 Our sun'll rise in the centre of our galaxy ? So what'll happen to our current excentral sun ? Or did you mean that that phrase is just a symbol itself, not the sun literally coming out of the galaxy's centre ? For those who think some thing will occur in 2012, nothing better not occur or it'll be another "We told you so" to the one's who take the universe with much speciality. But then, some thing paranormal could occur, and I think I'd like to see it. Just seems unlikely. Did you read what I wrote? Quote
tmaromine Posted October 28, 2007 Report Posted October 28, 2007 Did you read what I wrote? Most of it, I believe, yes (didn't watch video though...). You said that the sun is to rise in the centre of the galaxy. I wouldn't take that as literal ? . .unless in the sense that Earth will be aligned with the Sun which technically could be viewed as always aligned with the galaxy's centre, but Earth also being aligned paranormal specialness. Very neat indeed from an astronomical 'coincidental' view, but really meaningless, no ? The latter half of my post was just my opinion: I really don't think anything is going to happen that can't be predicted with known-data and computer software, IE, maybe just an alignment but nothing divine or spiritual or meaningful. But if something so does, I think it interesting to view... Quote
Turtle Posted October 28, 2007 Report Posted October 28, 2007 You said that the sun is to rise in the centre of the galaxy. I wouldn't take that as literal ? . .unless in the sense that Earth will be aligned with the Sun which technically could be viewed as always aligned with the galaxy's centre, but Earth also being aligned paranormal specialness. Very neat indeed from an astronomical 'coincidental' view, but really meaningless, no ? I believe this is a misinterpretation, and the proper interpretation may have meaningfull consequences. What the Sun is doing is arriving at and crossing the Galactic Plane. From what I have found in astronomy references as to exactly how far our Solar System is currently from the crossing, we have no measure to the degree of accuracy given by the Mayan calendar. The potential danger of this crossing is the added radiation if I recall? :hihi: I found references & discussed this before in another thread; will try & find it. Nonetheless, the key phrase is "galactic plane". :eek2: :evil: addendum: Low & behold I started a whole thread on it. http://hypography.com/forums/astronomy-cosmology/10192-our-galactic-plane.html#post157723 :evil: Here's Eclogite's significant contribution; red highlight mine.However in a letter to Nature (Periodic mass extinctions and the Sun's oscillation about the galactic plane) these astronomers note the periodicity to be 26 million years.In another letter to Nature (The Sun's motion perpendicular to the galactic plane) we are told "For all the models we consider, the most recent passage of the Sun through the galactic plane occurred in the past 3 Myr provided only that the present position of the Sun is between 0 and 20 pc above the plane." Please note that the full cycle is double whatever of the above figures we go with. Quote
tmaromine Posted October 30, 2007 Report Posted October 30, 2007 Ah, so Sun'll arrive at the galactic plane in 2012 and be 'levelled'/'on it' instead of 'below' or 'above' the plane.... I think I'll just wait till 2012. :( Quote
LaurieAG Posted November 1, 2007 Report Posted November 1, 2007 Hi Buffy, I hadn't heard this one before: can you explain what they mean by "align with the center of the milky way?" That's kind of like saying "the Earth will align with the Sun"... Yes I thought it was a bit vague too, unless you consider aligning with the center of a spiral galaxy a bit like like looking down a gamma ray blunderbuss (and hoping that it doesn't go off while you're looking). Here's a link that Orbsycli posted in the lounge to decode your birthday: ~-_ Planet Art Network _-~ It gives a good breakdown on how the Mayan calendar cycle actually works. Quote
Turtle Posted November 1, 2007 Report Posted November 1, 2007 What's going to happen on December 21st 2012?This site should answer some of your questions.(me I think its going to rain) Curious About Astronomy: What's going to happen on December 21st 2012? In any case the Sun crosses the plane of the Galaxy twice every year as we orbit around it, with no ill effect on Earth. ... To clarify, this is not the same as the solar system crossing the galactic plane, which as Ecoglite shewed has a period of 26 million years. Ah, so Sun'll arrive at the galactic plane in 2012 and be 'levelled'/'on it' instead of 'below' or 'above' the plane.... I think I'll just wait till 2012. That is the speculation of some of the new agey interpretations of the Mayan calendar, yes. However, the astronmers Eclogite quoted gave a margin of error for Earth's position relative to the galactic plane of 2 parsecs (which is ~ 6.5 light years) for whether we crossed or not within 3 million years ago. More from a previous reference:>> Periodic mass extinctions and the Sun's oscillation about the galactic plane Raup and Sepkoski1 have recently reported evidence fora 26-Myr periodicity in the occurrence of mass extinctions based on a study of marine fossils. The data baseline of 250 Myr suggests events of variable amplitude, with some of the strongest peaks associated with boundaries between major geological periods which have been defined by previous palaeontological studies. In a more limited quantitative study, Fischer and Arthur2 earlier cited evidence for a 32-Myr period of major extinction events. Hatfield and Camp3 were among the first to suggest that mass extinctions might be correlated with periodic galactic phenomena, noting intervals of 80−90 Myr between major mass extinctions with an exceptionally strong mass extinction every 225−275 Myr. Here we point out a possible correlation between the 26-Myr extinction period and the Sun's oscillation about the galactic plane. This stuff's enough to keep a person up at night. :phones: Quote
Turtle Posted November 1, 2007 Report Posted November 1, 2007 I believe this is a misinterpretation, and the proper interpretation may have meaningfull consequences..... The potential danger of this crossing is the added radiation if I recall? :eek2: addendum: Low & behold I started a whole thread on it. http://hypography.com/forums/astronomy-cosmology/10192-our-galactic-plane.html#post157723 OK. From the other thread, last post. The danger mentioned in this case is not crossing the Galactic Plane, but rather that we are about to cross a bubble boundary. Then there's that haunting nasty business of extinction, and while the Nature articles have it correlated to the galactic plane, the article I got the 33 million year cycle from correlated extictions to our position in relation to the Local Bubble....The sun is on the edge of what is sometimes called the Local Bubble, a great void in the distribution of interstellar gas in the nearby galactic neighborhood. As voids go, the Local Bubble interior is one of the most extreme vacuums yet discovered. The very best laboratory vacuum is about 10,000 times denser than a typical interstellar cloud, which in turn is thousands of times less dense than the Local Bubble. The Local Bubble is not only relatively empty (with a density of less than 0.001 atoms per cubic centimeter); it is also quite hot, about one million degrees kelvin. By comparison, the interstellar cloud around the solar system is merely warm, about 7,000 degrees, with a density of about 0.3 atoms per cubic centimeter. American Scientist Online - The Galactic Environment of the Sun Plane it may be, simple it is not. :phones: So many speculations so little time. :eek::eek::hyper: Quote
paigetheoracle Posted November 5, 2007 Report Posted November 5, 2007 If you believe the world will end, you're probably right. If you believe something new and wonderful will arise, you're probably right too. History is full of events, good and bad, that can lead you to predict other similar events will follow (war and peace, famine and plenty, flood and drought, pestilience and health: These bands show that things swing between two polar opposites, including progression and regression (The wheel will always come round again). Quote
paigetheoracle Posted November 5, 2007 Report Posted November 5, 2007 Do you know anything about the Timewave College? I think that's what it's called, anyway. Terrence McKenna was the first to design this linear map of intensity.You could see on his map when intense and novel things happened in our history.It was graphed. There are patterns to space and time. Patterns that repeat themselves over and over.There is a crescendo going on here. ALL of history is condensing itself right now, it repeats over and over.Take all of history and condense it in half,and then do it againand againand againand it gets shorterand shorteruntil what? You reach a crescendo. It's kind of hard to visualize...Terrence McKenna was great at describing it.Youtube timewave McKenna and you will get a LOT of good information. He saw time spiraling into a point in 2012, just like the maya have predicted. Before I even knew of any of this I had a profound vision of time doing exactly that.I felt time spiraling into a point, and when it reached this point, it had an orgasm. Interesting way of describing it! I call this kind of situation an Accumulation/ Discharge Cycle (speeding up of repeated events, until climax reached and an explosion of energy occurs, leading to a cooling down period (plateau of peace) and then the 'ball' starts rolling again, starting off the whole 'ineffable' cycle once more). By the way do you know if Terence MacKenna has heard of Viktor Schauberger? I ask because he believed the universe ran on a few simple principles apparently and the spiral (galaxy/ whirlpool) was one. Quote
Queso Posted November 5, 2007 Report Posted November 5, 2007 I don't know. Terrence is dead, now.You described it well. Think about evolution. It took billions of years for people to evolve, and then that time was cut in half, and in half again, and in half again, and it the interval of evolutionary periods just get shorter (Fibonacci) and shorter (anthropological, cultural, industrial, etc) up until around 2012 when the orgasm of novelty occurs and the cooling begins. This pattern in time/space/evolution is evident to anyone who looks at the patterns. How it will physically affect us and our planet can only be speculated at this point in time. Quote
CraigD Posted November 6, 2007 Report Posted November 6, 2007 It’s not a mystical calendar numerological conspiracy theory, but as a balancing counterpoint to this thread’s “coming orgasm of novelty” (love that phrase ) intimations, I think this post is a good point to make reference to Richard Duncan’s “Olduvai theory”. I don’t personally accept it’s predictions, but it’s an interesting (if dire and gloomy) theory, and one with which, IMHO, anyone worthy of the title “futurist” should be familiar. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.