spyroe Posted October 15, 2011 Report Share Posted October 15, 2011 Hello Just wanted to get feedback on my idea for quantifing space.Its a stable energy field thats made up of vortexes on our 3 axis of perception.here's a youtube link to a video. Spyroe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rade Posted October 16, 2011 Report Share Posted October 16, 2011 Perhaps you will find the arxiv.org link below on the bivacuum to be of interest. It considers both the torus and the antitorus type vortex concepts. Correct me if I error, but your video only considers a torus type vortex to quantize space, not antitorus, would this be correct ? http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0003001 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spyroe Posted October 17, 2011 Author Report Share Posted October 17, 2011 Hi Rade , thanks for the response. I'm not sure why you think my model uses torus or anti torus. I dont know what an anti torus is. Can you send me a link to a discription or picture.My model uses a simple helix/vortex. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clinkernace Posted August 27, 2012 Report Share Posted August 27, 2012 Hello Just wanted to get feedback on my idea for quantifing space.Its a stable energy field thats made up of vortexes on our 3 axis of perception.here's a youtube link to a video. Spyroe Interesting visual images. I'll be spending some time trying to make sense of them, and integrate them into my best ideas on the subject. It seems to me that before this can happen, we must define charge. I like your focus upon a dynamic geometry. Keep working, please! My objection is only that your attempt to extend the geometry of "particles" to consciousness is more a disjointing than a stretch. Do you really need that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.