belovelife Posted February 19, 2012 Report Posted February 19, 2012 recently there was an experiment where ( i think) 1cm X 1cm piece of aluminin foil was heated with a laser to try and make it fuse into hight elements all that they got was a plasma while this plasma could have unique properties in itselfcould a diamond lense laser with a diamond spherical shinking cell be a better mix for the experiment where the shere shinks as outside pressure is appliedone of the plates has the laser attached to it with a diamond lensethen a hydrolic intermixing shell where the hydrolic fluid compresses the created plasma (while taking into account the thermal expantion properties of the hydrolic fluid, and other materials, so as the aluminim is heated into a plasma, the chamber increases pressure on the plasma while this could be done with a magnetic field also, do you think it would be more beneficial if the experiment was done with pressure and a diamond lense laser? Quote
belovelife Posted February 19, 2012 Author Report Posted February 19, 2012 the advantage i see in doing both, is say if you achieve a higher tier periodic element, you can immidiatly experiment the element is in a shell, similar to being incased and you can apply magnetic fields to the element and measure reactions (i.e. bend of space time potential) Quote
belovelife Posted February 19, 2012 Author Report Posted February 19, 2012 sorry thought about this a few months back , before the aluminum experiment, but wasn't sure how it would be recieved Quote
CraigD Posted February 19, 2012 Report Posted February 19, 2012 :naughty: BL, you really should capitalize and spell better. I can understand what you’re writing, but it’s an eyesore, and might give folk the impression you’re drunk or stupid (or stupid drunk ;)) – not an impression that lends itself to being taken seriously. recently there was an experiment where ( i think) 1cm X 1cm piece of aluminin foil was heated with a laser to try and make it fuse into hight elementsDo you have a link to the paper for or an article about this experiment? Even with the help of internet searches, I can’t much comment on it from the little you’ve said. could a diamond lense laser with a diamond spherical shinking cell be a better mix for the experimentLikewise, link to something, as I can only imagine what you mean by “a diamond shrinking cell”. To the best of my knowledge, there’s not much advantage to lenses made out of diamond (carbon) vs. glass (silica), other than for replacements in human eyes, as carbon is less prone to be rejected by the body than silica is. Diamond does have a much higher melting temperature than even special glass (about 4600 vs. 1500 K), but optics, even high powered lasers, rarely need to operate at such high temperatures. As one would expect, making diamond lenses is much more expensive than making glass ones. the advantage i see in doing both, is say if you achieve a higher tier periodic element, you can immidiatly experiment the element is in a shell, similar to being incased and you can apply magnetic fields to the element and measure reactions (i.e. bend of space time potential) I can’t see what unusual properties you’d get from aluminum (atomic number 13) that’s been nuclearly fused into a heavier element (ailicon, AN 14, is next heavier). Recall that every element heavier than beryllium (AN 4) was produced by stellar fusion – as the saying goes, we’re all stardust. :) Quote
belovelife Posted February 19, 2012 Author Report Posted February 19, 2012 http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/26/x-ray-laser-bakes-solid-plasma-from-aluminum-foil-brings-us-clo/ and for the shrinking shere issue, you would need a shere that geometrically shrinks, while being plyable enought to bend where if each individual piece had diamond in the predicted shape then it would be able to hold the plasma the curvature of the initial pieces would be enough room for the aluminum while the end result would be smaller than the volume taken by the aluminum in the first place then each piece of the shere could potentially be attached to an individual laser so if mutiple lasers are neccisary to create enought of a reaction, they would each be stable at the connection point on said apparatus i would not suggest letting the new material be destabalised by anything else ##** at first**## (i.e. gamma radiation or "plutonium nuetrons", ) a electromagnetic field should be enought to at least test reactioins Quote
belovelife Posted February 19, 2012 Author Report Posted February 19, 2012 (edited) https://php.radford....eJMT_v1n1p4.pdf and the system should be as much as a vacume as possible :D Edited February 19, 2012 by belovelife Quote
belovelife Posted September 28, 2012 Author Report Posted September 28, 2012 ok, i was pndering doing this with a magnetic element like iron because in my theory, when you magnetise a material, you alighn the pairs in the impetali processin which case, all the fub-atomic fields are alighned, increasing the the magnetic resonance so as the fields are alighned you get something similar to this +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------------- +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------------- and so on and so forth then as you do the experiment you condense the matter, and may achieve a fusion so as +++++++++++-------------------+++++++++++------------------- so the forces attract eachotherthen you potentially can achieve a sum of +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------------------------ if you get hwat i am saying Quote
Buffy Posted September 28, 2012 Report Posted September 28, 2012 if you get hwat i am saying Nope. Against logic there is no armor like ignorance, :phones:Buffy Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.