Jump to content
Science Forums

How many forum posters does it take to change a light bulb?


Recommended Posts

Posted
"It's not a matter of where he grasps it! Its a question of radius to finger length ratios! A 5-foot nerd cannot grasp a lightbulb with a volume with an infinite number of decimal places!"

 

Pythonically,

Buffy

 

 

LOL

classic :(

Posted
And 5 people to change the discussion into a creation vs. evolution thread!

 

Which came first.. the lightbulb or the lightsocket?

 

...it's just too perfect. Therefore, there is a God. :(

Posted
And 5 people to change the discussion into a creation vs. evolution thread!
1 to ask "have there ever been any partially developed lightbulbs discovered in the fossile record? Exacty how old is that light bulb? What are the chances of that light bulb mutating into another species of light bulb? - if so; how long would it take? (hypothetically speaking((or should I say: Hypographetically speaking)) ).:(
Posted
And a large crowd from all around the globe to say: "we don't believe in lightbulbs!":naughty:

 

Anyone who actually believe in lightbulbs have obviously not seen the massive amount of evidence to the contrary. People claim they change lightbulbs all the time. But for some reason nobody seems to have a lightbulb available if I stop someone in the street or take a cab. I once visited a cafe and there was an electrician and he didn't have a lightbulb either.

Posted

36 to also to argue that whether or not that changing a lightbulb is just a result of causality (the bulb burning out) and therefore the inescapable result in a deterministic universe compells the bulb changer and the individual has no choice but to comply with the laws of nature and resultantly change the bulb.

 

17 to claim that it is eveidence of alien technology.

 

The same 17 to claim that it is part of their perpetual motion device.

Posted

...and three to argue that the entire discussion about it being deterministic or non-deterministic was determined already, thus bringing that discussion to it's glorious, circular conclusion :(

Posted
...and three to argue that the entire discussion about it being deterministic or non-deterministic was determined already, thus bringing that discussion to it's glorious, circular conclusion :(

 

Bah...infidel dog...if you had seen the glory of a light bulb you would not write such things!

Posted

Okay then, the original number of people needed (according to C1ay) was 1,363. Up to this * point in the thread the total number has risen to 1,431 + "A large crowd". And then with orbsycli's ludicrous 1,237,904 people to change this into a creation vs. evolution thread the total number of people becomes 1,239,335.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...