peacegirl Posted May 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 Consequently, by removing all forms of blame which includes this judging in advance of what is right and wrong for others, we actually prevent the first blow of injustice from being struck. This corollary is not only effective by your realization that we (all mankind) will never blame you for any hurt done to us but also by our realization that any advance blame, this judging of what is right for someone else strikes the first blow since it is impossible to prevent your desire to hurt us by telling you we will never blame this hurt, when we blame the possibility by telling you in advance that it is wrong. In other words, by judging that it is wrong to do something, whatever it may be, we are blaming the possibility of it being done which only incites a desire to challenge the authority of this advance accusation that has already given justification. Therefore, in order to prevent the very things we do not want which hurt us, it is absolutely imperative that we never judge what is right for someone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peacegirl Posted May 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 As we end this chapter there is one vital point that appears contradictory and needs clarification. If the knowledge that man's will is not free is supposed to prevent that for which blame and punishment were previously necessary, and if a person who saw his child deliberately kidnapped and killed would be compelled to desire revenge as a normal reaction in the direction of satisfaction, how can this knowledge prevent some form of retaliation? Just because you have learned that man's will is not free is not a sufficient explanation as to why you should not want to avenge this child's murder by tracking down the criminal and cutting his heart out with a knife, so once again we must understand what God means when He mathematically instructs us not to blame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peacegirl Posted May 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 When the knowledge in this book is released and understood, every person as always will be standing on this moment of time or life called here, so to speak, and preparing to move to the next spot called there. As the principles set forth in this book become a permanent part of the environment (more will be explained in the economic chapter) you will know that the person who kidnapped and killed your child or committed some other form of hurt which occurred prior to the release of this knowledge – regardless of how much you hate and despise what was done – will never blame in any way your desire for retribution, which means that he will never run and hide to avoid your act of revenge because this is a form of tacit blame; and when it fully dawns on you that he will never make any effort to fight back no matter what you do to him, never lift a hand to stop whatever you desire to do, it becomes impossible for you to derive any satisfaction from this act of retaliation especially when you know that he will never again be permitted by his conscience – because of the realization that he will not be blamed – to do to another what was originally done to you and your family. As a result, the chain of retaliation will be broken which will prevent any further criminal behavior. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peacegirl Posted May 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 Time and time again a person desiring personal revenge has been able to experience a certain amount of control over his desire, but never to the degree that will permit this Great Transition to get underway – with the help of our slide rule. When he fully realizes that the perpetrator whom he wishes to hurt in return will never desire to retaliate with further hurt, or desire to commit another crime to anyone anywhere, the victim is compelled to lose his desire for revenge because it is impossible to derive any satisfaction from the advance knowledge that he will be excused by the entire world. The full realization that he can no longer justify this act of personal revenge because no one will consider it wrong or tell him what to do (remember, no longer will anyone judge what is right for another); that he will be able to do what he wishes to this person without any form of justification because he knows in advance that he will not be blamed and that everyone, including the one to be retaliated upon, will be compelled of their own free will (their own desire) to completely excuse what is definitely not his responsibility – ALTHOUGH HE KNOWS IT WOULD BE HIS RESPONSIBILITY (the two-sided equation) – makes him desire to forgo what he knows he doesn't have to do, if he doesn't want to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peacegirl Posted May 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 He knows he is not under any compulsion to do what has not yet been done and when he becomes aware that no one henceforth will judge his actions, that he is completely free from the trammels of public opinion to do, without the slightest fear of criticism, whatever he thinks is better for himself, that he will not even be punished by the laws that were created for this purpose, it becomes mathematically impossible for him to desire hurting this other person under these conditions regardless of what was originally done to him. It would be equivalent to deriving satisfaction from continuing to beat up an individual who, though fully able to fight back, refuses to lift a hand in his own defense. This allows the Great Transition to get underway, as you will see in greater detail as we proceed, without any fear of harm. Let us observe why the perpetrator can no longer continue his crime spree under the changed conditions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smokinjoe9 Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 Just because you have learned that man's will is not free is not a sufficient explanation as to why you should not want to avenge this child's murder by tracking down the criminal and cutting his heart out with a knife, so once again we must understand what God means when He mathematically instructs us not to blame. Under your premise, the child would never be murdered..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peacegirl Posted May 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 The potential kidnapper or criminal who is standing on this moment of time called here when this knowledge is released, and before the act is done, is prevented from further contemplation of his crime by the realization that he will never be blamed, judged, criticized, or punished for this act (and by the removal of all forms of tacit blame which unconsciously gave him the motivation and justification), which compels him to get greater satisfaction in his motion to there by giving up what he was contemplating. Up until the present time there was nothing powerful enough to prevent man from risking his life to satisfy a desire regardless of who got hurt because the satisfaction of possible success outweighed the dissatisfaction of possible failure; but when he becomes conscious that a particular reaction of no blame will be the only response to his actions by the entire world regardless of what he is contemplating, he will be compelled completely beyond his control, but of his own free will, to refrain from what he now foresees can give him absolutely no satisfaction (if this still confuses you, reread chapter I). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peacegirl Posted May 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 This natural law of man's nature gives him no alternative but to obey it in order to derive greater satisfaction, and will prevent the first blow from ever being struck. As we extend this magic elixir, Thou Shall Not Blame, we will be able to unravel the causes of war, crime and hatred which are deep rooted and interwoven and envision how life will be when all hurt in human relations comes to a permanent end. There will be many volumes extending this law into every area of human interaction. The answer to the world's problems will satisfy Communism and Capitalism, the Blacks and the Whites, the Jews and the Christians, the Catholics and the Protestants, the rich and the poor, the cops and the robbers. However, it must be understood that in the world of free will innumerable wars, revolutions, and crimes were a reaction to various forms of hurt which did not allow any alternative but to retaliate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peacegirl Posted May 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 Consequently, man was compelled to blame, criticize and punish as the only possible alternative when judged by his undeveloped mind. When those about to fight back discover that they will no more be retaliated upon, it is also necessary for them to realize that the factors responsible for this consideration of war and crime as the lesser of two evils will also be removed; and are those responsible given any choice but to remove these factors when they know that those whom they have been hurting will never blame them for this? To fully understand the fact that conscience – our feeling of guilt – was never allowed to reach the enormous temperature necessary to melt our desire to even take the risk of striking a first blow, it is only necessary to observe what must follow when a crucible is constructed wherein this new law can effectively operate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peacegirl Posted May 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 It was impossible for any previous stage of our development to have understood the deeper factors involved which was necessary for an adequate solution, just as it was impossible for atomic energy to have been discovered at an earlier time because the deeper relations were not perceived at that stage of development; but at last we have been granted understanding which reveals a pattern of harmony in the mankind system equal in every way with the mathematical accuracy of the solar system, and we are in for the greatest series of beneficent changes of our entire existence which must come about as a matter of necessity the very moment this knowledge is understood. Although this book only scratches the surface, it lays the foundation for scientists to take over from here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peacegirl Posted May 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 The undeniable knowledge I am presenting is a blueprint of a new world that must come about once this discovery is recognized, and your awareness of this will preclude you from expressing that this work is oversimplified. Because it would take many encyclopedias combined to delineate all of the changes about to occur, it would have been much too long for a book that was written for the express purpose of providing mankind with a general outline. It will be up to future scientists to extend this scientific principle in much greater depth. As we leave this chapter I hope I have made it clear that just as long as man is able to justify hurting others, he is not striking a first blow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peacegirl Posted May 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 Before I demonstrate how this justification is permanently removed by preventing the insecurities that have permeated our economic system and justify the act of self-preservation by whatever means necessary, I will allow you an opportunity to see exactly what happens in a human relation where this justification is already removed. In the next chapter, l shall reveal how all automobile accidents and carelessness must come to a permanent end. Before we move on, I must clarify a very important point. Christ and Spinoza turned the other cheek and paid the consequences because the justification to hurt them was never removed, but I am going to demonstrate how it is now possible to prevent the first cheek from being struck which renders obsolete the need to turn the other cheek or retaliate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peacegirl Posted May 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 Although Ghandi won freedom for his people and Reverend King won certain civil rights, they accomplished this at great expense. However, all was necessary because we are moving in the direction of greater satisfaction over which we have no control because this is God's law or will. At this point, I suggest that you study carefully, once again, Chapter Two and then discuss it to make certain you understand that if you find any flaw it exists only in your not understanding the principles, for they are undeniable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smokinjoe9 Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 It's nice but.....Natural law will never be one sided, G vs E, is natural law, just like a seed grows, a plant dies, cancer kills, people smoke, babies die, dogs bite, the will of the universe will always be free it is too big to contain... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smokinjoe9 Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 In the next chapter, l shall reveal how all automobile accidents and carelessness must come to a permanent end. Don't, again I am no physicist, but I understand it a little(you must remove cars to prevent car accidents), Tires pop, engines break, headlights burn out..Oh yeah people fall asleep, get drunk. There's more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C1ay Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 Christ and .....Uh, who's Christ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanctus Posted May 18, 2005 Report Share Posted May 18, 2005 I now speak as a MODERATOR/ADMINISTRATOR of thess forums (the questions and answers I had as a member will be put aside): Peacegirl: I see you put much of effort in your post,but not in the forum you ignored all the questions in let's say the last 50-80 posts at least. It seems to me you just copied and pasted your book, ignoring what all the members asked you. This is not how the forum works, it is a platform for discussion, that's not what yo do (anymore, at the start there was discussion)! This is a WARNING, but don't get me wrong, I wish you stay on the forums and discuss as your theory is quite interesting as far as I understood and your knowledge of what you want to defend seems very profound (by the pm's I sent you, you see I took you seriously). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.