Buffy Posted September 8, 2012 Report Posted September 8, 2012 No that's not confusing me, you are not following the meaning of my replies. In fact I give up. I know how you feel Pincho. Were you aware that I have invented a cure for cancer? I have developed a computing algorithm which when applied to DNA causes cancerous cells to revert to a non-cancerous state. The algorithm uses a geneto-neural network that applies quantum states to resequence individual genes on the fly directly within the cell. Like you, the breakthrough came for me from my superior knowledge of O(n log n) algorithms while completely avoiding all medical theories on cancer that are preventing scientists from finding a cure. Of course since it is in my brain, and the specialists I have talked to are unable to comprehend the brilliance of my solution, the work is of no practical importance. Unfortunately this amazing breakthrough will die with me because of the stupidity of the establishment who are conspiring against me because they profit off of the status quo. I feel your pain. Breathe, breathe in the air. Don't be afraid to care, :phones:Buffy JMJones0424, blamski and Moontanman 3 Quote
Buffy Posted September 8, 2012 Report Posted September 8, 2012 For those of you dropping in, these wildly and amazingly off-topic posts were pulled out of the thread "What Would Be Proof Of A God Or Gods Running The Universe?" in the Theology forum. I suppose they speak for themselves.... Run, run rabbit run. Dig that hole, forget the sun, and when at last the work is done, don't sit down it's time to dig another one, :phones:Buffy Quote
VoiceInTheWilderness Posted September 9, 2012 Report Posted September 9, 2012 A fair bit of research has shown that the human brain appears to be hard wired into space time itself. I could cite case study after case study which proves that the results are quite beyond random but where's the fun in that? Instead I will ask some of you to consider that even IF God were to have 'evolved' in some fashion....(once again demonstrating characteristic human arrogance in assuming that our puny linear understanding of time is how a much Greater being had to have progressed to 'Godhood status')....it is His current status that merits our greater consideration. An overarching intelligence, once He controls time, controls it all. Think about it....One could go back and tweak one's own beginning to no end, in effect, creating one's self and all He surveys. And once, having One's fill of seeing the ignominious beginning and vacuous ending of many a civilization, would know the best way of bringing balance to all things. In essence, becoming an efficiency expert to the NTH! Having seen the best beginnings and endings, One would seek to bring all into a state of higher existence. Of course, we fail to grasp so much, so often. And this woefully contrived scenario is no different. His own Words Reveal Him to be just Who He Claims to Be.... http://www.kingdombiblestudies.org/2hands/2hands1.htm Quote
JMJones0424 Posted September 9, 2012 Report Posted September 9, 2012 A fair bit of research has shown that the human brain appears to be hard wired into space time itself. I could cite case study after case study which proves that the results are quite beyond random but where's the fun in that?No worries, we aren't looking for fun, we are looking for intelligent discussion. As such, you should be able to provide sources for your claims. If you can cite case study after case study to support your claims, then we'd certainly prefer that you at least cite one so that we have something to work with. Moontanman 1 Quote
VoiceInTheWilderness Posted September 9, 2012 Report Posted September 9, 2012 No worries, we aren't looking for fun, we are looking for intelligent discussion. As such, you should be able to provide sources for your claims. If you can cite case study after case study to support your claims, then we'd certainly prefer that you at least cite one so that we have something to work with. "we" are looking for intelligent discussion, you say. Is this the 'royal' "we" of which you speak? No matter, the question I posed is rhetorical. http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/925987/many_scientists_are_convinced_that_man_can_see_the_future/ http://hplusmagazine.com/2010/11/04/precognition-real-cornell-university-lab-releases-powerful-new-evidence-human-mind-can/ Then there's the Ganzfeld procedure, oh and.... http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_15_3_vasilescu.pdf Of course, I could go on, but to what end? Time, as we all know, is what we make of it, and there is precious little left by which to make meaningful decisions each, about where what and where we are going after..... http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_earthchanges31.htm Luke 21:25-28, Revelation 16:8, Isaiah 24:20 Peace, VW Quote
Moontanman Posted September 9, 2012 Report Posted September 9, 2012 "we" are looking for intelligent discussion, you say. Is this the 'royal' "we" of which you speak? No matter, the question I posed is rhetorical. http://www.redorbit.com/news/science/925987/many_scientists_are_convinced_that_man_can_see_the_future/ http://hplusmagazine.com/2010/11/04/precognition-real-cornell-university-lab-releases-powerful-new-evidence-human-mind-can/ Then there's the Ganzfeld procedure, oh and.... http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_15_3_vasilescu.pdf Of course, I could go on, but to what end? Time, as we all know, is what we make of it, and there is precious little left by which to make meaningful decisions each, about where what and where we are going after..... http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_earthchanges31.htm Luke 21:25-28, Revelation 16:8, Isaiah 24:20 Peace, VW Lets see some peer reviewed articles in main stream science journals and not fringe science magazines please... And give the proselytizing a break... Quote
VoiceInTheWilderness Posted September 9, 2012 Report Posted September 9, 2012 Lets see some peer reviewed articles in main stream science journals and not fringe science magazines please... And give the proselytizing a break... LOL! You cut me to the quick! You asked.... I was just giving you the benefit of the doubt. As for proselytizing, consider the facts in evidence. We're all guilty on that score, are we not??? http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_earthchanges31.htm "Or something....." Peace and benificence, VW Quote
Moontanman Posted September 9, 2012 Report Posted September 9, 2012 LOL! You cut me to the quick! You asked.... I was just giving you the benefit of the doubt. As for proselytizing, consider the facts in evidence. We're all guilty on that score, are we not??? http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_earthchanges31.htm "Or something....." Peace and benificence, VW I suggest you read the rules you agreed to when you joined this forum... Quote
Pincho Paxton Posted September 9, 2012 Author Report Posted September 9, 2012 (edited) A fair bit of research has shown that the human brain appears to be hard wired into space time itself. I could cite case study after case study which proves that the results are quite beyond random but where's the fun in that? Instead I will ask some of you to consider that even IF God were to have 'evolved' in some fashion....(once again demonstrating characteristic human arrogance in assuming that our puny linear understanding of time is how a much Greater being had to have progressed to 'Godhood status')....it is His current status that merits our greater consideration. An overarching intelligence, once He controls time, controls it all. Think about it....One could go back and tweak one's own beginning to no end, in effect, creating one's self and all He surveys. And once, having One's fill of seeing the ignominious beginning and vacuous ending of many a civilization, would know the best way of bringing balance to all things. In essence, becoming an efficiency expert to the NTH! Having seen the best beginnings and endings, One would seek to bring all into a state of higher existence. Of course, we fail to grasp so much, so often. And this woefully contrived scenario is no different. His own Words Reveal Him to be just Who He Claims to Be.... http://www.kingdombiblestudies.org/2hands/2hands1.htm Time doesn't need to be past, present, and future. Time can be the direction of Cause energy flow. Time can be the inflation of particles, and the deflation of particles using a scalar force. To rewind time would be to deflate inflation. So then time would be like a hose pipe inside a particle, and the hose pipe is reversed. And an example of this reversal is found in the Bose/ Einstein condensate. In this experiment the atoms change from a disorganised state, to a central position. And that would be the hose turned backwards. I tested this out in a computer simulation, by changing the temperature of water, and I moved the atoms to central positions gradually, and reversed time. I got a fractal that exactly matched the fractal of snowflakes. Snowflakes are like a photograph of spacetime flow. Here is my simulation to download. Press the spacebar to see the atoms moving together.. Snowflake Simulator Here are real snowflakes. As you can see, the atoms have moved with the flow towards a central point, and that is the flow of time...Google Snowflakes So in my theory, time isn't Past, Present ,and Future, it's the flow direction of causal movement. Time dilation is the restriction of that flow force. When you have understood what I have posted, take a look at your own body. Your hands, your feet, the flow forces of biology are the same. Then when you understand that, take a look at everything... leaves on trees, cats, dogs, fish, fruit. You can apply the forces to everything.. and a sun is the out flow force. The opposite to a snowflake, it is hot, and the forces move outwards. Bubbles in boiling water, hot, and the forces move outwards. So time in my theory is not linear. It is forwards, backwards, and fractal. So using a telescope to look back in time doesn't work. Edited September 9, 2012 by Pincho Paxton Quote
blamski Posted September 9, 2012 Report Posted September 9, 2012 Of course, we fail to grasp so much, so often. you can say that again :rolleyes: Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.