Deepwater6 Posted September 30, 2012 Report Posted September 30, 2012 (edited) Am I truly self aware? Are you? Edited September 30, 2012 by Deepwater6 Quote
belovelife Posted September 30, 2012 Report Posted September 30, 2012 interesting question, do we exist? i think therefore i am, i post therefor i type question is, are you, ? i don't know, i would have to meet you first :lol: Quote
CraigD Posted October 1, 2012 Report Posted October 1, 2012 Am I truly self aware? Are you?IMO, Yes and yes, because both you and I can pass the mirror test. If this is a scientific question, if should have an objective procedure for answering. The mirror test is such a procedure. Quote
Eclogite Posted October 1, 2012 Report Posted October 1, 2012 Some of the time, yes. Most of us, I suspect, think of ourselves as the self-aware portion of our thinking. But much, perhaps most of our thinking is sub-conscious, or arguably non-conscious. Our self awareness is a veneer on an automatic system. sman 1 Quote
Deepwater6 Posted October 1, 2012 Author Report Posted October 1, 2012 I just got here, I'll be leaving very shortly. A brief speck of time and awareness in what may be an endless void on either side of it....and some people have no idea what to do with themselves on a Sunday afternoon. :shocked: Quote
Guest MacPhee Posted October 1, 2012 Report Posted October 1, 2012 IMO, Yes and yes, because both you and I can pass the mirror test. If this is a scientific question, if should have an objective procedure for answering. The mirror test is such a procedure. Is the mirror-test really an objective procedure? It relies on vision. It makes the assumption that the animal/person being tested has good eyesight - or indeed functioning eyes at all - in order to perceive the reflection in the mirror. If we followed this assumption, mightn't we make this argument: 1. All blind persons, when placed in front of a mirror - fail to recognise, react to, or even be aware of their reflection.2. Therefore all blind persons obviously lack self-awareness. The argument reeks of sophistry. But what are the actual flaws in it? Quote
CraigD Posted October 1, 2012 Report Posted October 1, 2012 Is the mirror-test really an objective procedure? It relies on vision. It makes the assumption that the animal/person being tested has good eyesight - or indeed functioning eyes at all - in order to perceive the reflection in the mirror.It's a good positive test, so, as the question is "are you or I self aware?", good for answering that question. If we followed this assumption, mightn't we make this argument: 1. All blind persons, when placed in front of a mirror - fail to recognise, react to, or even be aware of their reflection.2. Therefore all blind persons obviously lack self-awareness. The argument reeks of sophistry. But what are the actual flaws in it?A flaw is that this argument assumes that the mirror test is also a good negative test in all circumstances. The argument is a good RAA argument, where this assumption is shown false by it following from it via the argument that "all blind [human] people lack self-awareness". Quote
Deepwater6 Posted October 1, 2012 Author Report Posted October 1, 2012 Some of the time, yes. Most of us, I suspect, think of ourselves as the self-aware portion of our thinking. But much, perhaps most of our thinking is sub-conscious, or arguably non-conscious. Our self awareness is a veneer on an automatic system. Very good description Eclogite. Most of my daily thought is not centered on my awareness. It's only when I make a conscious effort to know who or what I am does true awareness take shape in my mind. Thought about long enough it becomes a strange thought. Quote
Guest MacPhee Posted October 1, 2012 Report Posted October 1, 2012 It's a good positive test, so, as the question is "are you or I self aware?", good for answering that question. A flaw is that this argument assumes that the mirror test is also a good negative test in all circumstances. The argument is a good RAA argument, where this assumption is shown false by it following from it via the argument that "all blind [human] people lack self-awareness".Thanks Craig - I was going to say in my post, that the argument was an example of "RAA"! But I left it out, because "RAA" feels somehow, unconvincing. I know Euclid used it a lot. But RAA seems to evoke a feeling of not being quite right. Quote
Iam Joy Posted October 1, 2012 Report Posted October 1, 2012 I'm not sure anymore... I've been doing some reading recently about the myth of consciousness and for anyone interested in whether we are genuinely self-aware, or whether this is a self-deception, I recommend 'The Illusion of Conscious Will' by Daniel M Wegner - it's an excellent and thought-provoking book. Consciousness science has not yet come close to discovering our elusive self-awareness. I'm beginning to think that it doesn't actually exist in the mind, but is a sense; our genuine sixth sense, and that it exists thoughout our bodies. I'm going to write a paper about this soon. There is an amazing article about self-awareness and the myth of consciousness that I read way back in the 90s that you can still get if you're a New Scientist subscriber - it's called 'The Zombie Within' and is well worth a read. :smile: Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.