What Is Our Universe

[georgi_zlatev]

The Scientist is looking for higgs boson.This partical can not exist because we can make conclusion what is small than this partical.The smallest partical is wave.We can make supposition that partrical is two waves positive and negative.They attract each other and form the mass.Is our Universe without end?Over our universe there is field.This field make positive and negative waves exist and to form mass.

Edited April 30, 2013 by georgi_zlatev

[georgi_zlatev]

Is our Universe endless.No it is surrounded by field .This is the only explanation ,in contrary the Universe shall always be expanding.If we think what is beyond the space if the answer is space what is beyond that space if it is substance what is beyond that substance.The only answer is that Universe is surrounded by field .

[georgi_zlatev]

There is no such thing as higgs boson because as much as little it is arise the question can it be devide into small pieces.The smallest particle is composed by two waves positive and negative which attract each other and create the mass.

[Buffy]

It would not matter if the Higgs is made up of other smaller elements, we've now got data that shows it does indeed exist and matches the theory that says it should.

 

If it does consist of smaller elements, that'd be cool, but that doesn't mean it "doesn't exist"....

 

Wave-particle duality is a well understood (if confoundingly hard to understand) concept of physics. That doesn't exactly mean a wave IS a particle though. You may want to investigate this more.

 

 

It's turtles all the way down, :phones:

Buffy

[georgi_zlatev]

If higgs boson exists the answer can higgs boson be devided into small pieces is positive.Also this pieces being material can also be devided into small pieces and this is without end.The only answer of this problem is higgs boson to be made of waves.

[Buffy]

If higgs boson exists the answer can higgs boson be devided into small pieces is positive.

Saying that "if something exists, it can be divided into smaller pieces" has been true, but we do not know that, and in fact the Standard Model if anything is designed around the notion that it's parts are the smallest thing there is.

 

SO if you're going to declare that the Standard Model is wrong, you'd better have more than a one sentence declaration of this "fact."

 

Also this pieces being material can also be devided into small pieces and this is without end.The only answer of this problem is higgs boson to be made of waves.

This really doesn't indicate you've looked into particle wave duality as I suggested in my previous post. You might want to at least draw some connections between it and whatever it is you're trying to say.

 

 

An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in his subject, and how to avoid them, :phones:

Buffy

[georgi_zlatev]

I think that i am misunderstood.Let accept that higgs boson is smallest material particle.Even smallest particle higgs boson is big compared with free space which means that higgs boson can be devided into small material particle except higgs boson is made by waves.

[Aethelwulf]

The Scientist is looking for higgs boson.This partical can not exist because we can make conclusion what is small than this partical.The smallest partical is wave.We can make supposition that partrical is two waves positive and negative.They attract each other and form the mass.Is our Universe without end?Over our universe there is field.This field make positive and negative waves exist and to form mass.

 

Who told you the Higgs Boson cannot exist because of it's size? This isn't a logical argument.

 

To understand what mass is, you need to understand what it is from a quantum mechanical viewpoint. In quantum mechanics, mass is a number of things, one of those being a quantum fluctuation. On a more technical, if not complicated note, a particle which gains mass is a ground state photon which fluctuates from the ground state. The appearance of mass is therefore a change of energy in a system. Physicists have for years wondered what causes this. Therefore it was speculated that perhaps there was some field which gave mass to all particles.

 

I don't believe that an entire field is required for mass, it is a state locally to all particles, given by a charge [math]\sqrt{G}M[/math]; it therefore becomes an intrinsic property of particles, depending on the energy given to a system. Such an energy example, is a photon-photon collision [math]\gamma \gamma \rightarrow e^{+}e^{-}[/math]. The phase of this transformation is part of satisfying energies inside of particles. But as far as I understand mass, it isn't about fields giving individual particles of other respective fields with mass, this is about a local phenomenon inside of particles themselves which ascertain the correct energies for the phase transition.

[georgi_zlatev]

If higgs boson is material partical it can be devided because even the smallest material partical is bigger than the free space.This mean that the smallest material partical is made by waves.

[Aethelwulf]

The nature of this universe, does not respect pointlike over wavelike activities, in fact the universe fundamentally only cares about equal results.

[Aethelwulf]

If not equal results... at least those attributed to statistical probabilities.

[Mountain]

Even were the Higgs Boson to be made of waves, it could still be split down into ever smaller frequencies to an infinite degree.