The Nature Of The Electron

[Little Bang]

Aeth, did you ever consider the possibility that G might be an artifact of some other phenomena?

[Aethelwulf]

Aeth, did you ever consider the possibility that G might be an artifact of some other phenomena?

 

That's a difficult question, because [math]G[/math] is a constant of attraction: related by not only gravitational physics, but also related to the speed of light and the distance between two objects. This constant appears to be related to the gravitational nature, however there are exceptions in which gravity and magnetism are related to the torsional properties of spinning objects which exert the curvature on the local spacetime dynamics, so [math]G[/math] may play a wider role than just determining the gravitational force.

Edited November 28, 2013 by Aethelwulf

[Aethelwulf]

In this specific model, when [math]G[/math] takes on the large value of [math]10^{40}[/math] inside a particle, it combines naturally with the torsional physics spoke about in the form of gravimagnetic spin forces on the subatomic level. This level of physics, the energy range itself has not been experimentally varified either way. It should be noted that there is no gravimagnetic forces present in any experiment at the present time but we haven't probed this space enough to confirm strong gravity theory.

 

Magnetic and gravitational forces therefore couple naturally at this level it is hypothesized. The electric force even unifies in a sense inside the particle because it's magnitude is more or less equal; both forces are effectively cancelled out acting as the Poincare stress which is required in an intrinsic and internal model of particles.The shell of the particle is the Horizon of Transport, which is an analogy to the boundary conditions found in black holes, except we may not need to deal with black hole physics.

 

Recently I have been wondering about particle masses and wondered if it depended on varying degrees of [math]G[/math]. For instance, say [math]G \geq EM_{Force} \cdot 10^{40}[/math], any varying gravitational energy above the electromagnetic force would remain as a residue of the system which could explain the resultant particle masses of the standard model. Basically there is some gravitational energy left over when the value's of the gravitational force and the electromagnetic force have cancelled out inside the electron. The value of the mass obtained from the Higgs Mechanism might depend on the energy provided by the gravitational intrinsic field of the system. Just speculation from me at the moment, but it's possible.

Edited November 28, 2013 by Aethelwulf

[Little Bang]

I do not know how or why mass distorts time but the fact remains that it does. Everyone thinks that a mass reaches out with a force or " graviton" and grabs hold of another mass to pull it towards itself. Lets assume there is no force between two masses only distorted time. I'll use exaggerated numbers because time dilation is so small in the real world. I have mass A(clock) and mass B located two meters away from A. A's mass is insignificant to B's. I give A, (the clock) a starting velocity of one meter/s toward B. The total time dilation between A's starting point and B is one second. We know the clock slows as it starts toward B but for simplicity we'll use the one second dilation. Now when we calculate d/t at B we get a velocity of 2 meters/sec instead of the 1 meter/sec we started with. If we use this idea for averaging a gazillion particles in a mass why couldn't this be what we see as gravity. This same process would explain why a mass being accelerated experiences the inertial force.

Edited November 29, 2013 by Little Bang

[alionalizoti]

The hypothesis nature of electron

 

well, its nature could be anything,

but so far the only visible evidence for its existence are the cathodic rays of cathodes classified as electronic!

so we can experimentally assume that the composition parts of cathodic rays have the following nature, conditionally

1) optical nature - they are visible 

2) magnetic nature - they bend their path under outer magnetic field

3) force nature - they move objects such as tiny wheels

4) electrostatic nature - they brush - expand under charged disks influence

 

can we generalize and apply this knowledge to other situations, i don't know!

knowledge is not wisdom, but wisdom is not knowledge! 

 

[HydrogenBond]

Interestingly, LB has a good point. I know on the other site, I attempted to explain why one particle shoots off one way and the other the other by saying maybe there is a handedness inside the electron. 

 

 

One way to model this, is first consider a wave tank, with two wave generators, one at each end of the tank. If these two wave generators are 180 degrees out of phase, the two waves will cancel in the middle of the tank, because the crests from the left will overlap the troughs from the right. We are pumping energy into the tank, but there appears to be odd calm in the middle; hidden energy. The energy of two waves is hidden in the calm. 

 

If we place a partition in the calm middle of the tank, two waves will reappear, with the water on one side of the partition rising into a crest and the water on the other side sinking into a trough. The electron would be connected to the energy rich stillness in the middle of the tank, with electron conversion into gamma a partitioning process.