Jump to content
Science Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

Friends,

 

One of the Cosmological Theories that was booted about in days gone by was the "Continuos Creation Model".

 

If every cubic yard of empty space could create just one Neutron per millennia*, the net mass of the Universe should stay constant.

 

* Or was it 1 Neutron per Eon?

 

A naked Neutron soon spits out an Electron and becomes a Proton. Eventually the Protons and Electrons become Hydrogen atoms—and so on,

 

In the Modern Theory, you might need a few extra sub-atomic particles to get a well-rounded Universe.

 

A.} This violates the Conservation of Mass/Energy...

 

Yes, but IF it turned out to be True, O well...

 

Bye-Bye to C of M/E as an unvarying rule—there are a few obscure loopholes.

 

B.} Modern Measurements might necessitate our adjusting the "One Neutron per Cubic Yard every 1000 years a wee bit.

 

That isn't terribly germaine.

 

C.} Even today, if Space creates one Neutron per Cubic Yard per Millennia, could we hope to measure and prove it?

 

But I don't want to argue for an old discredited Cosmology Theory.

 

 

************ ******** ************

 

But lets suppose, just for the sake of argument, that Continuos Creation isn't and never was in the past.

 

But at some far future date, as some super humanly intelligent sentients sit glumly watching the last few Stars burn out...

 

And they have a "Eureka!" moment where the figure out how to re-order space to make it so.

 

A.} Assume that the change is local—but like a crystallization, it spreads rapidly in all directions—lets say at the speed of light.

 

B.} Just for fun, lets suppose that the first 1.5 Billion years after space is changed, that it creates about 10% faster than mere replacement.

 

C.} In denser areas, the rate of Creation increases slightly.

 

Inside our galaxy it might make matter at about .001% faster than Steady State and inside a normal density sun it might run at about .01% faster.

 

Why? Because I want to examine what happens when the net density is always growing—however monumentally slow that the Densification may be.

 

************* *************** ****************

 

Since large parts of our Universe will be racing away from us faster than the Speed of Light by then...

 

I don't suppose that the change could ever overtake them, no matter how massive our universe gets?

 

As we've discussed other places—a Black Hole the Size of our Universe wouldn't have to be terribly dense—About as dense as our Universe, as a matter of fact.

 

We already have some huge Black Holes at the center of Galaxies.

 

With more matter being created contiously—eventually you'd have massive Black Holes containing far more mass than our current Known Universe contains now...

 

And even if all the matter got thoroughly shredded crossing the Event Horizon or The Schwartzchild Radius or whatever...

 

The continuos creation should continue inside each Black Hole—Thus insuring that it got ever larger AND was blessed with solid matter inside.

 

Do Ultra Mega-Massive Black Holes create any special or paradoxial effects?

 

What happens when you have Black Holes contained inside even larger Black Holes inside still Larger Black Holes?

 

Can these things be explored mathematically rigorously, even though they are mere Phantasies?

 

 

Saxon Violencw

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...