Labrat Posted May 13, 2014 Report Posted May 13, 2014 (edited) I've been predicting it for years, and now many others are starting to speak about the new day that is dawning in education. Yes, public schools are still engaging in their eternal struggle to turn out educated graduates, though one can easily argue that was never the goal of mass compulsory schooling from the start. However, many people are starting to see that their education is truly in their own hands. The internet is changing how we view our options. The college inflation bubble will burst, just as the markets crashed and the housing bubble popped. Why should people be saddled with debt for a significant stretch of their working lives for something that is becoming more and more available for minimal costs or for free? Edited May 13, 2014 by Labrat Quote
Eclogite Posted May 14, 2014 Report Posted May 14, 2014 If I was cynical I would say "Why pay for a second rate education when you can get a third rate one free on line?" LaurieAG and Buffy 2 Quote
Labrat Posted May 15, 2014 Author Report Posted May 15, 2014 You must have a good bit more faith in institutionalized higher education than I have. I am guessing you assume the only alternative to an overpriced education is an online degree. There are so many more paradigms incubating right now. Do you know how many excellent (and extremely pricey) colleges are experimenting, for instance, with offering many of their classes online for free? Stanford and MIT are two in the game. And that is just one example. Quote
Eclogite Posted May 17, 2014 Report Posted May 17, 2014 You must have a good bit more faith in institutionalized higher education than I have.Well, I don't really deal in faith when it comes to such important matters. Although I have reservations about the possible dilution of degree quality by opening bachelor's qualifications up to such a large percentage of the population, the general standard and consistency of universities within the UK appears to be high. I believe research would tend to confirm this positive view for many countries other than the UK. I am guessing you assume the only alternative to an overpriced education is an online degree. There are so many more paradigms incubating right now. Do you know how many excellent (and extremely pricey) colleges are experimenting, for instance, with offering many of their classes online for free? Stanford and MIT are two in the game. And that is just one example.I am aware of these developing and expanding programs. However, these appear to lack to important elements of a university education:1. Guidance as to subjects for study appears to be limited. Perhaps you can correct me on this point.2. The opportunity to interact with students and faculty is very much reduced. I have no doubt that for some people such an approach will offer, if it does not already, a viable alternative to conventional education. I am not convinced we have established anything like the rigour, or the support systems, or the financial and social model to do so on a large scale effectively. Quote
Buffy Posted May 17, 2014 Report Posted May 17, 2014 My daughter just got finished with freshman year at San Diego State University. She did well and really learned in smaller classes, but the one she had trouble with was a huge lecture class. When I was in school, we always had small group sections with TA's for those big classes so you could actually interact and get your questions answered so you understood them. They've basically eliminated those due to budget cuts, and it sucks for students today. I have actually worked in the on-line learning industry (in software that makes it happen), so I'm something of an expert on it. These systems have become hugely important as an adjunct to live classes--you'll find them everywhere and they are a godsend in terms of easing the distribution of class materials and providing class notes--but they are absolutely not an adequate replacement for class time where you can work with someone who knows what they are talking about. I am too lazy to look it up, but we have lots of data after nearly 20 years of serious and widespread usage of on-line learning (OLL), and the one statistic that still bowls me over is that something like 90% of individuals who start an online course *never complete them*. This is skewed a bit because so many of these courses are individual study at private for-profit schools, but that's actually the crime: there's been this gigantic business built out of taking money from people who want to learn, throwing online courses at them and giving them no motivation to actually take them or get the degree. There are parallels to the exercise/workout club business.... Don't get me wrong, I love that we're putting more and more stuff on line, it's just the idea that it's a *replacement* for actual *teaching* that's really totally out of whack. You don't really learn well passively. You need to be challenged and *to* challenge in order for you to actually *get* what you "know." An education isn't how much you have committed to memory, or even how much you know. It's being able to differentiate between what you do know and what you don't, :phones:Buffy Eclogite 1 Quote
Labrat Posted May 18, 2014 Author Report Posted May 18, 2014 (edited) Please don't misunderstand. In no way do I believe that the coming changes have already arrived, been perfected. They are in their infancy. It is sort of like looking at Juno in 1997 and predicting that email will never replace snail mail, because it takes people far too long to get their email on dial-up, to look at the current incarnation of on-line learning as it stands now and declare it already tried and discardable. I also don't believe online learning will completely replace in-person learning. But the current higher educational system will have to make changes in the future. Oh, and to speak to one of your points, Eclogite, there is already terrible degree dilution. I can't speak to circumstances in the UK, but here in the US, degree inflation is rampant. So many people have Bachelor's degrees, many jobs are requiring Master's, not because they are truly necessary for each job, but simply to distinguish candidates from one another. We have been sold the idea for several decades now that everyone should go to college. Colleges simply must lower standards if they want to sell that many degrees. Lower standards+wickedly high prices=customer dissatisfaction. When enough customers get fed up with overpaying for underperformance, changes will occur. Edited May 18, 2014 by Labrat Quote
RainMan Posted May 20, 2014 Report Posted May 20, 2014 Why should people be saddled with debt for a significant stretch of their working lives for something that is becoming more and more available for minimal costs or for free? Because there is a good number of young 20 somethings out there who equate the amount of their debt to success. The more debt they have, the more successful they are because they are so deeply involved in the financial aspect of society. I'm serious, that's how some people think. Online learning will grow more in the years to come and I for one like the idea. Quote
Eclogite Posted May 21, 2014 Report Posted May 21, 2014 I have actually worked in the on-line learning industry (in software that makes it happen), so I'm something of an expert on it. These systems have become hugely important as an adjunct to live classes--you'll find them everywhere and they are a godsend in terms of easing the distribution of class materials and providing class notes--but they are absolutely not an adequate replacement for class time where you can work with someone who knows what they are talking about.We are making increasing use of short online training sessions for our employees. These are not replacing instructor led classes, but compliment them. A classroom, in my view, is not a place to learn basic facts. These are best acquired by the individual, in their own time and at their own pace. Online learning is reasonably effective and painless way of doing this. Classrooms provide the opportunity to solidify those facts, place them properly in context, experiment with how they may be used and thus truly understand them. I do not think it impossible to achieve that via a more complex online experience, but we are a great distance away from that at present. Buffy 1 Quote
Buffy Posted May 21, 2014 Report Posted May 21, 2014 Yah, I meant completely replace, which you'll see "online universities" trying to push. I've seen a lot of success in industry dealing with "required training" but it's pretty moronic when you have materials that are supposed to be passable by everyone in the organization: Someone from the IT department calls you and asks for your password. Should you:A) Give them your passwordB ) Give them your password and your bank account numberC) Ignore the call because it was probably a wrong numberD) Hang up and report the incident immediately to the security department Yah, they really ask questions like that to make sure you sat through the informational slides. Training is everything. The peach was once a bitter almond; cauliflower is nothing but cabbage with a college education, :phones:Buffy Quote
ErlyRisa Posted May 26, 2014 Report Posted May 26, 2014 I have always felt sorry for highschool leavers that have the mentality that the degree is about mulla. ...I never wanted the money... wasn't even considering working for ANYONE other than myself : I WANTED the KNOWLEDGE. It slowly turns out, it it took me 15 years of being unemployed to realise... the education is not the important part: It's the networking. eg. Arts degree? What is that: Nothing more than getting to know people. Quote
Moronium Posted March 27, 2019 Report Posted March 27, 2019 (edited) You can pick up a college textbook on virtually any subject at a thrift store for a buck or less (often 4 for a buck). Do you really need to pay a college prof. to read it to you? At the prices they charge? "Lectures" are seldom more than that--reading the book for you and reciting its contents to you. Is that "all" there is to education? No, but it's a good start. Edited March 27, 2019 by Moronium Quote
inverse Posted April 27, 2019 Report Posted April 27, 2019 However, many people are starting to see that their education is truly in their own hands. The internet is changing how we view our options. just because of this summary kernel reason , english educational system will presumably be collapsed in next two century.but more formally and literally their existing educational approach does not conform with contemporary educational system's philosophy Quote
fahrquad Posted May 26, 2019 Report Posted May 26, 2019 I believe in learning something new every day. It keeps your mind young and fresh and costs little to nothing. Most things I post here I either vaguely recall reading something about long ago, or someone mentioned a topic that piques my interest, and I go hunting on the interwebz for more information. Quote
hazelm Posted May 26, 2019 Report Posted May 26, 2019 You must have a good bit more faith in institutionalized higher education than I have. I am guessing you assume the only alternative to an overpriced education is an online degree. There are so many more paradigms incubating right now. Do you know how many excellent (and extremely pricey) colleges are experimenting, for instance, with offering many of their classes online for free? Stanford and MIT are two in the game. And that is just one example.The thing I wonder about this is how many of us would wander away on days that something comes up that we "just have to do". How easy is it to stick with something that isn't required of you? Of course, we could do the same at a brick and mortar university but professors would catch you up on it. Or the challenge of seeing your friends pass you by. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.