Set Theory And A Subdimension Model Of Mind: Chicken Egg Question

[QuantumTantrum]

Excerpt: Using set theory, I can prove consciousness emerges from the low energy range. I showed in previous work how this contradicts theories which says the mind is responsible for reality and we shall see why not in the context of set theory.

 

 

Is Consciousness a Subdimension?

Here, from now on, I will for this take assume that a subset is a subdimension. There are specific conditions which make that so, being a subdimension of a larger system. 

If our experiences are contained in spacetime and the bubble of perception is a real case then the thing we call consciousness is not outside of physics, or the laws contained therein. I use the same argument to support that perhaps the wave function smears out possibilities in consciousness as well, giving rise to superpositioning of possible choices an individual ''feels'' as though they have.

 

Let us denote consciousness (and everything related to) as a set B . Let the universe then be the set A. Thus if  B is a subset of A then I can write this as 

 

 

B⊆A

 

It is taken that B is a subset of A that by conjecture of set theory, it cannot be an exact copy of A. No subsystem can model precisely the larger system it is made of. This means exactly that B cannot contain all the information in A. A final conjecture would be, that the mind exists but the universe doesn't depend on the mind whilst the mind does depend on the universe. This should clear up, once and for all the dichotomy of whether the universe is mind-dependant or not. Taking into consideration that the mind seems to be a late low-energy phenom as well, the mind emerges from the universe not the other way around.