Jump to content
Science Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

That's a big Mersenne prime! I’m mathic enough to recognize that’s likely what it was, but googled up its GIMPS press release to be sure.

 

It makes me feel dated to realize that some of my earliest computers didn’t have enough memory or even storage to even represent this number (a bit less than 9 MB). Now, my browser uses 200 MB just rendering all the pretty graphics for the webpages talking about it

 

It’s cool that the giant prime hunters involved in this discovered a bug in Intel’s high-end Skylake CPU – give’s people who like to do this sort of thing a response to people who say they’re just wasting energy and hardware.

 

I only vaguely understand how you prove that a number like this is prime - a good opportunity to brush up on my math!

Posted

CraigD I love this part of the GIMPS-release link you posted:

The official discovery date is the day a human took note of the result. This is in keeping with tradition as M4253 is considered never to have been the largest known prime number because Hurwitz in 1961 read his computer printout backwards and saw M4423 was prime seconds before seeing that M4253 was also prime.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...