Jump to content
Science Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's based on a (probably deliberate) falsehood. Evolution is a theory of the origin of species, not biochemistry.  

 

While it's true that we think the biochemistry must have evolved in some way, the theory of evolution does not tell us how, because evolution presupposes the existence of replicating organisms that inherit traits from their predecessors. It can't, on its own, tell us how the first organism of this type appeared. So we have no "evolution tree for DNA". 

 

If, one day, we have a fully worked out theory of abiogenesis then I suppose we might have such a tree. but until then, not a chance. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...