emessay Posted July 11, 2005 Report Posted July 11, 2005 By the way, how about 'smallest nuke fuel cell' to drive engine [ future cars or trains ] ?? Quote
Chacmool Posted July 11, 2005 Report Posted July 11, 2005 By the way, how about 'smallest nuke fuel cell' to drive engine [ future cars or trains ] ??Tell that to the oil companies... Quote
majordinkydau Posted July 17, 2005 Report Posted July 17, 2005 I've run a small mining operation off of pelton wheels with only 20' drop on 1" black plastic pipe. Low impact hydro plants like this are very reasonable. Major changes in the way the world consumes fossil fuels will be fought vigorously by people with lots of money because thats the way people are. If you do it on a small level no one sweats it but if you want to take whole comunities off of the power, oil grid your likely to see some violent opposition. (Just another paranoid conspiricy theory)I remember a cartoon about energy in the early 70Fossil fuels are good for energy! We own the oilHydroelectric power is good for energy! we own the waterSolar power is good for energy! we own the (oops)Solor power is not an alternative! Quote
Skippy Posted July 21, 2005 Report Posted July 21, 2005 There's a lot of ideas for alternative energy, like solar panels and windfarms.The issue I have with these is the obvious - the sun sets every day, and the wind isn't constant either.So how about building a huge turbine, giving it vanes so it'll always be presenting itself head-on to the stream (like a windmill), attach it with cable to a heavy weight to anchor itself and chuck it in the sea where there's a decent current? This turbine can be constructed from light, strong, non-eroding materials like a carbon sandwich, and due to the enormous torque presented by the ocean current, you can connect it to a generator with a high-ratio step-up gearbox. The whole unit can be sealed, and the powercable delivering power to the grid can be laid along the seafloor so as not to experience strain from the current.Harvesting energy from the ocean currents is in fact using solar energy, but there's a lot more torque and power to be tapped than using windfarms - and it's non-polluting, and out of sight.I can't see this approach being expensive at all, and an array of these spread along the coastline should be able to deliver a fair amount of power to the grid. Any comments?Check out these guys, Wavegen, they have a great site that discusses using energy from waves. Portugal has hired a Scottish Company, Ocean Power Delivery, to deploy sausage shaped tubes 5 kilometers off the coast to harness wave energy to provide electricity to up to 1200 homes!! I have a blog listed in my profile where I have been gathering info on Alternative Energy Sources. I think the time is now to start advancing the alternate energy, oil and natural gas will run out in our lifetimes. Quote
geokker Posted July 23, 2005 Report Posted July 23, 2005 I think wave power is definitely the way to go in the short to medium term. Geothermal systems and orbital solar panels are fairly sexy too. In the long term, I'm assuming someone somewhere will exploit quantum energy in some efficient manner - hopefully fyoozhun energy - a type of energy with a y and a z has got to be cool. Quote
goku Posted August 7, 2005 Report Posted August 7, 2005 use nuclear power plants to generate electicity. harnes the radiation from the waste to power cars and generate more electricity. once we accumilate enough waste to run off of, shut the reactors down. Quote
biochemrex Posted September 20, 2005 Report Posted September 20, 2005 Dear Bo you are right about the counter rotating turbines, but this is not a new idea. It has been patented and is under development in Australia. Keith Quote
biochemrex Posted September 20, 2005 Report Posted September 20, 2005 Dear Go your idea has some merit. It would be possible to build a large storage unit and the heat energy could be harnessed. It would hardly be a huge source of energy, but what I think would be most valuable would be the preservation of what might become valuable isotopes. It would be a mistake to bury them in the ground since they can only be made by nuclear reactors and while most at present have no commercial value that could always change. With laser chemistry it would be possible to mine isotopes from such a low grade source and at some stage they may become far more valuable than gold? Kieth Quote
goku Posted November 18, 2005 Report Posted November 18, 2005 ye know cars put off a alot of heat. we need to harness that energy and change it to kenetic energy. Quote
Boerseun Posted November 18, 2005 Author Report Posted November 18, 2005 Nice to see an old thread revived! Another thought: How about taking a square kilometre of ocean surface, and criss-cross it with thousands of insulated cables made from a piezoelectric metal? And make sure that the insulation is sufficiently buoyant to suspend the cable just under the water surface. Add a couple of polystyrene floats every couple of meters to maximise reaction to surface motion, and anchor the whole thing sufficiently, say every hundred meters or so, so that the whole thing doesn't just float away. If you have a cable every meter, you'll need 2,000 kilometers worth of cable. (1000 north-south, 1000 east-west.)If you have an anchor every 100 metres, you'll need 100 anchors. (10 north-south x 10 east-west)If you have floats every 10 metres, you'll need 10,000 floats. (100 n-s x 100 e-w) ...and plug the whole shebang into your power grid! Seeing as the surface is permanently in motion, you'll continuously be harvesting electricity through, well, eventually solar power. Sun heats up air, causes wind, moves surface. I wonder what the potential output of such a scheme would be? A tiny little piezoelectric filament in a lighter is enough to provide a spark... but maybe the waves won't be moving fast enough to cause a useful piezoelectric effect. Quote
geokker Posted November 18, 2005 Report Posted November 18, 2005 The Oceans are chock-full of crystals - salt. There must be a way of harvesting their power through the natural conduction of water. Whatever we do, we should exploit that brainy German blokes discovery - mass is energy. The Earth is pretty massive. We should find a way to exploit it directly, maybe gravitationally. It's a big, spinny thing after all - a turbine that'd need the power of God to slow down. Quote
Boerseun Posted August 14, 2006 Author Report Posted August 14, 2006 Gonna bump this sucker up some... Anybody here with experience and/or knowledge about piezoelectric thingys, as per my post #27? Quote
Zythryn Posted August 14, 2006 Report Posted August 14, 2006 Afraid I have no experience with those Boerseun. How much energy do they produce? There sounds like you have a lot of material involved between the floats and the anchors and cables. One thing I think we need to keep in mind is most energy sources always will have their peak and down times. Solar working only half or a third of the day is not a problem IF it is part of a larger solution. Wind is the same. I have heard a number of people going a route of wind and solar, as wind tends to work more reliably at night and winter while solar is more reliable during the summer (and day of course). Anyone familiar with any of the fusion plant studies going on? I have heard there are some at the research stage. The longest sustained burn is about 90 seconds I think? Quote
Michaelangelica Posted April 7, 2007 Report Posted April 7, 2007 This is a different take on solar powerMetta Spencer's weblog: Two New Anti-Global Warming Inventions Quote
Turtle Posted January 23, 2008 Report Posted January 23, 2008 Here's one that I think is pretty new!? :) Course they say there is nothing new under the rain...er... the Sun. ;) :doh: ...Scientists from CEA/Leti-Minatec' date=' an R&D institute in Grenoble, France, specializing in microelectronics, have recently developed a system that recovers the vibration energy from a piezoelectric structure impacted by a falling raindrop. The system works with raindrops ranging in diameter from 1 to 5 mm, and simulations show that it’s possible to recover up to 12 milliwatts from one of the larger “downpour” drops. ...[/quote'] Rain Power: Harvesting Energy from the Sky Quote
freeztar Posted January 23, 2008 Report Posted January 23, 2008 Wow, that's pretty interesting. I've always wondered why we don't make better use of rain to produce energy. I actually have an idea that I came up with years ago, but I'm going to test it out first to see if it is viable. If so, then I'll patent it and come back and tell ya'll about it. Quote
Turtle Posted January 23, 2008 Report Posted January 23, 2008 Wow, that's pretty interesting. I've always wondered why we don't make better use of rain to produce energy. I actually have an idea that I came up with years ago, but I'm going to test it out first to see if it is viable. If so, then I'll patent it and come back and tell ya'll about it. Your privacy is safe with us. :doh: :D I was thinking that if you put these piezo-electric rain generators on a roof, then you could also collect the runoff & use the hydraulic head to do some more work. Double your pleasure, double your fun. :Glasses: ........ Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.