Er=Epr Information Paradox Solution

[Instantonly]

The recent observations of Professor Leonard Susskind(ER=EPR/Uniting Quantum and GR) have allowed an exercise I undertook to complete some 20 years ago to have been provided a conclusion. I submit the proposals for which I have been left no other resolution that accounts for the observable.[/size]

 

Proposal: The model of light reflection of an atom is incorrect in that an electron from the nucleon only provides the field that allows a captured photon to momentarily collapse to an electron without a nucleon specific electron being required to jump shells.[/size]

 

Proposal: Hawking Radiation provides the solution to the information paradox.[/size]

 

To back up from my conclusions that the model of light refraction off an atom is wrong and that Hawking radiation is the solution to the information paradox I will supply the short description of the fields that develop instanton shift that has somewhat guided the exercise to these conclusions.[/size]

 

Empty space(as relevant to the conservation of momentum) that is void of substantial particle is 2 dimensional. The property of this 2d state is exponential collapse. This is exhibited within vacuum as virtual particles.[/size]

 

A photon is the evacuation of spatial collapse. Photon polarisation differentiates the exponential but does not eliminate collapse compression. The path of a photon is differentiated by the load it places upon the vacuum. If a photon is not absorbed it's path will not end in simple dissipation. Due to it's entanglement with it's anti-photon and the separation of '3d spaces' this provides, the effect of vacuum compression is to collapse the elongated photon into a highly ionised electron.[/size]

 

It is this that is at the heart of the conclusion that the refraction model is incorrect. The effect of a photon encountering an atom's fields is the same as it suddenly reaching elongation extension maximum. When a photon becomes momentarily trapped by an atom's field it is exposed to the full force of the vacuum and collapses momentarily to an electron as information is exchanged between the photon and the atom that re-aligns the photon's polarisation.[/size]

 

 

 

At this point I'm assuming that a description of BH singularity in instantonian would simply be one of it's geometric space knots. Where everything outside the EH is defined by photon polarisation, the singularity space is defined by neutrino polarisation. It is only the virtual space of the EH that is truly 2 dimensional. I'm not at all certain I could define the singularity space as 1 dimensional. The picture I get is that a neutrino is 'the time particle'. Singularity space is 4 dimensional. Our 3 dimensional space runs at 90 degrees to the timeline space.[/size]

 

In this manner it only requires a single Hawking radiation pairing within pure 2d space to define BB theory to the obvious conclusions we observe.[/size]

 

Conservation of momentum is defined by 4 dimensional space and centre of momenta. Conservation of energy is defined by 3 dimensional space and angular momenta. Both can be plotted through the finite subdivision rule.[/size]

 

While a photon is refracted through matter the energy it absorbs is dissipated as polarisation information. Should an IR photon travel far enough through a vacuum without encountering matter it will collapse as a high energy electron observed in nature as cosmic rays. If the photon begins within the visible spectrum it will collapse to an ionised proton. Above the visible spectrum it will collapse as a neutron(which obviously decays). An unimpeded Hawking photon will collapse to a graviton(similar to a neutron but with heavier quarks), which decays through neutron chains.[/size]

Space-time curvature becomes a matter of polarisation resolution I must assume.[/size]

<

<

<

<

<

For further detail see: [sPAM link removed]