petrushkagoogol Posted March 14, 2017 Report Posted March 14, 2017 (edited) My contention is that we can define brain types based on specializations - 1. Artistic - based on spatial and pattern specializations 2. Poet / Essayist / Orator - the wordsmith, slightly schizophrenic. 3. Athlete - able to handle physical stress. 4. Philosopher - lover of abstractions and empirical associations. 5. Scientist - good with equations and relations. 6. Mathematician - good with numbers. If the brain of a child is tested during prenatal and postnatal periods, proper decisions can be taken as to what career the child should persue. From the list some people may have one of the above types, but almost none, more than one. The common man may have - 7. Generic type - average in all spheres. 1-6 produce autistic types, 7 supposedly "normal" and "asymptomatic". Needless to say trail blazers come from 1-6, and not 7, although conventional wisdom states otherwise. Do you agree ? Edited March 14, 2017 by petrushkagoogol Quote
exchemist Posted March 14, 2017 Report Posted March 14, 2017 My contention is that we can define brain types based on specializations - 1. Artistic - based on spatial and pattern specializations2. Poet / Essayist / Orator - the wordsmith, slightly schizophrenic.3. Athlete - able to handle physical stress.4. Philosopher - lover of abstractions and empirical associations.5. Scientist - good with equations and relations.6. Mathematician - good with numbers. If the brain of a child is tested during prenatal and postnatal periods, proper decisions can be taken as to what career the child should persue. From the list some people may have one of the above types, but almost none, more than one. The common man may have -7. Generic type - average in all spheres. 1-6 produce autistic types, 7 supposedly "normal" and "asymptomatic". Needless to say trail blazers come from 1-6, and not 7, although conventional wisdom states otherwise. Do you agree ? What's the point in answering any of your threads, when you ignore the replies and just post more sh1t? JMJones0424 1 Quote
petrushkagoogol Posted March 14, 2017 Author Report Posted March 14, 2017 What's the point in answering any of your threads, when you ignore the replies and just post more sh1t? Read this, please..... :surprise: http://earthsky.org/human-world/brain-activity-pattern-as-unique-as-fingerprint Quote
exchemist Posted March 14, 2017 Report Posted March 14, 2017 Read this, please..... :surprise: http://earthsky.org/human-world/brain-activity-pattern-as-unique-as-fingerprintI've read it..... and was utterly amazed to find...........that it seems to have no relevance to your opening post. Why not start a thread on kipper paste? DrKrettin and JMJones0424 2 Quote
petrushkagoogol Posted March 15, 2017 Author Report Posted March 15, 2017 I've read it..... and was utterly amazed to find...........that it seems to have no relevance to your opening post. Why not start a thread on kipper paste? If you peruse the article carefully, you will observe that the study - Believes that human behavior can be aggregated based on brain activityANDThis in turn is correlated with performance on intelligence tests, as well as anomalies like schizophrenia and depression Quote
exchemist Posted March 15, 2017 Report Posted March 15, 2017 If you peruse the article carefully, you will observe that the study - Believes that human behavior can be aggregated based on brain activityANDThis in turn is correlated with performance on intelligence tests, as well as anomalies like schizophrenia and depression Yes I read that. But that does not remotely suggest your that proposed categories have any validity. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.