On The Wdw Equation

[Dubbelosix]

In my rotating Friedmann universe, I show how it is possible that non-conservation plays a fundamental role when the universe was producing particles at its maximum rate in the presence of spacetime curvature, which relates to the irreversible particle creation. There are other cases in which we may think energy varies in a universe; let alone general relativity lacking any kind of global conservation for energy (because of the lack of global time found in 1967 to 68 by DeWitt) but we may also argue that as a metric expands, it must correspond to new vacuum energy since we abandoned the Newtonian concept of a vacuum when we developed the idea of the fluctuation and zero point fields. Also, rotation will lower primordial Friedmann energy levels of a universe.

 

 

Though the late Lloyd Motz had said Friedmann made an unfounded assumption about the conservation of energy in a universe as it expands, it is fair to say Friedmann was unaware of the time problem and unaware of the requirement to abandon a Newtonian definition of a vacuum.

 

 

A few words on the timesless equation, WDW equation (Wheeler-de Witt). It's found from the path quantization of the field equations of General Relativity. It is constructed on a ''superspace'' which is another word for it being modelled on a complete three geometry metric with an evolution of the motion of all the systems in the universe, including those which record time - the result is a static universe in which there are no significant changes. The latter is the extreme case of the interpretation of the disappearing time variable of the universe and we can clearly see it is not the case, the internal universe has undergone many important phase transitions. The equation, which is just a Hamiltonian of the universe, is attached to a wave function as H|Ψ> = 0 and it could be interpreted as saying the universe has no energy at all! This could still turn out to be true, but these are still after all interpretations, it may turn out that the universe can be reparameterized, with new variables, that plays the role of time.

Since the field is not complex, it means that the gravity field is real, unlike the other three forces of nature which are inherently complex (important feature of quantum mechanics are couplings which require complexified fields). If we consider the WDW equation as a conservation law, then it should be no surprise an isolated, closed system normally remains static, so perhaps the WDW equation should not be surprising? It might be surprising if the energy of a universe is allowed to vary, then we could argue for this special case and making the WDW equation obsolete.

 

Anyway, back quickly to the main subject, the idea that we need to violate a conservation principle to find a changing universe, is something that should be seriously considered and reference to such claims can be found here http://vixra.org/pdf/1402.0145v1.pdf

If the universe is dynamical and we actually do have a conservation law breakdown, then we will find the WDW equation is obsolete. We would need a different theory to account for additional energies in the universe and I suspect quantum theory to do this. A non-physical argument for the static nature of WDW, is that if someone was to sit outside the universe and measure it, the universe would not change, similar to a zeno effect of quantum mechanics. It would have properties, like an observable energy and charge. There are only two ways for a universe to become dynamic (note that dynamic means change) and nucleation of a universe, is different, which is a matter of origin. Either the universe interacts with something from the outside, like another universe resulting in a bounce... or my preferred method, there is a violation of a conservation law.... namely, we would violate the energy, so that energy may vary over time.

Edited June 26, 2017 by Dubbelosix