Jump to content
Science Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I don't think either the string hypothesis nor super-symmetry are true, mostly since everyone insists on calling the string hypothesis a theory, which it is most certainly not. It's sad when fellow scientists do not know the meaning of the term "scientific theory".

 

Alas I found a way to unite the gauge coupling constants via beta-expansion, it's far less known than beta-functions that are commonly used to calculate the running of the fundamental gauge couplings.

 

If my prediction for the strong coupling's value for the QCD integration parameter is true, then over 90% of super-string and super-symmetry papers are proven wrong. I think it's a good thing, we should have some better directions to go forward.

Edited by LabLad
Posted

The file you linked to is unintelligible. There is a corruption when you downloaded it, the equations are a mess. You need to fix it for clarity.

It works fine for me. Does anyone else have problems?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...