Updates On A Toy Model Of Gravity

[Vmedvil]

Who on this site works @ CERN? You could run some experiments to see if that math holds true to predicting the wave collapse with 86% accuracy. If it holds true in the experiment phase, then I have the right Theory of Everything.

 

I mean you could crank that up to 99.9999999999999999999% accuracy by developing the math a bit more & use it for ftl signaling, sustaining fusion reactions, & simulated realities down to the subatomic world all because you know where the wave functions will begin & end.

 

Actually, Polymath this is still not good enough to be tested despite being anomaly free to this point, it is not good enough to be tested either but if it ever comes to that I live in the midwest pretty close to the Fermilab  Muon Tevatron being a 3 hour drive. 

 

http://map.fnal.gov/

Edited November 10, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Super Polymath]

Actually, Polymath this is still not good enough to be tested despite being anomaly free to this point, it is not good enough to be tested either but if it ever comes to that I live in the midwest pretty close to the Fermilab Muon Tevatron being a 3 hour drive.

 

http://map.fnal.gov/

@ what point does it get tested? A higher percent accuracy than 86? Due to the nature of the theory itself there's infinite complexity of the system, there's no 100% predictive accuracy for the survival probability, ever. Edited November 10, 2017 by Super Polymath

[Super Polymath]

Just show that Elog8 is closer than Elog7, & Elog7 is more accurate than Elog6...you know what I mean. Why does it it stop @ 8, in fact I think you have infinite dimensions of gravity in your E term so I don't think 14% is fully accurate because the denominator isn't 240, it's infinity. But it's a somewhat accurate gauge, I mean we have to set a minimal length of events because we can't divide by infinity, but the smaller the length the more accurate the survival probability.

Edited November 10, 2017 by Super Polymath

[Vmedvil]

Just show that Elog8 is closer than Elog7, & Elog7 is more accurate than Elog6...you know what I mean. Why does it it stop @ 8, in fact I think you have infinite dimensions of gravity in your E term so I don't think 14% is fully accurate because the denominator isn't 240, it's infinity. But it's a somewhat accurate gauge, I mean we have to set a minimal length of events because we can't divide by infinity, but the smaller the length the more accurate the survival probability.

 

E₈ is irreducible it is in killing form and is Exact, invariant under automorphisms, which is why that E₇ is still partially variant under them as not being as invariant, E₈ is considered "Real Universe" where as E₇ is just very close. Trivial versus nontrivial, but is still a class of exceptional approximation. I am pretty sure based on how Dubbelsoix made his that it is E₈ or at-least E₇ I have never got my Q gravity metric to E₈ 

 

It is still partially variant under automorphisms which is why you see that Laplace or partial differential next to E_b For energy of body or bodies if the I_s term is used as a Summation or integral, do you know where it doesn't work inside the event horizon only working very close to the Schwarzchild radius as C - C = 0 , I don't still know how to define what is beyond that Radius or on that Radius but just very close.

Edited November 10, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Super Polymath]

E₈ is irreducible it is in killing form and is Exact, invariant under automorphisms, which is why that E₇ is still partially variant under them as not being as invariant, E₈ is considered "Real Universe" where as E₇ is just very close. Trivial versus nontrivial, but is still a class of exceptional approximation. I am pretty sure based on how Dubbelsoix made his that it is E₈ or at-least E₇ I have never got my Q gravity metric to E₈

 

It is still partially variant under automorphisms which is why you see that Laplace or partial differential next to E_b

Esub8 is infinitely beneath the Planck length, then. You can go Esub1/7.99999999-> to Esub7.999999999-> no higher & no lower than those fractions form dimensions (as opposed to types) of gravity for E. Edited November 10, 2017 by Super Polymath

[Vmedvil]

Esub8 is infinitely beneath the Planck length, then. You can go Esub1/7.99999999-> to Esub7.999999999-> no higher & no lower than those fractions form dimensions (as opposed to types) of gravity for E.

 

Sorta but the E₈ of space-time is in Planck units which means that Planck size is perfectly accurate along with C being the E₈ for Velocity. So not it is exactly Planck scale nothing below that makes sense as being the level to which space-time is generated. 

 

For Instance, look at this dimensional chart.

 

Edited November 10, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Super Polymath]

You go beyond C-C, the dimensions of gravity & motion of bodies are infinitesimally beyond the Planck length. It's C-(C-n) as you asymptotically approach infinity using Esub(1/(8+n)) or Esub(8+n), then. That's what I was trying to explain earlier. T contracts, the speed of light gets faster in a fractal dimensions, between de sitter & anti-de sitter space the middle of the curved heteronic string, is an asymptotic barrier.

Edited November 10, 2017 by Super Polymath

[Super Polymath]

Sorta but the E₈ of space-time is in Planck units which means that Planck size is perfectly accurate along with C being the E₈ for Velocity. So not it is exactly Planck scale nothing below that makes sense as being the level to which space-time is generated.

 

A line can always get shorter.

[Super Polymath]

Why do you think quantum entanglement works beyond the speed of light?

[Vmedvil]

You go beyond C-C, the dimensions of gravity & motion of bodies are infinitesimally beyond the Planck length. It's C-(C-n) as you asymptotically approach infinity using Esub(1/(8+n)) or Esub(8+n), then. That's what I was trying to explain earlier. T contracts, the speed of light gets faster in a fractal dimensions, between de sitter & anti-de sitter space the middle of the curved heteronic string, is an asymptotic barrier.

 

Okay, then define that n what is that n when C - C = 0 , what is changing at that point?

Edited November 10, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Super Polymath]

Sorta but the E₈ of space-time is in Planck units which means that Planck size is perfectly accurate along with C being the E₈ for Velocity. So not it is exactly Planck scale nothing below that makes sense as being the level to which space-time is generated. 

 

For Instance, look at this dimensional chart.

 

Spacetime is generated (vacuum energy) & lost (quantum eraser) about points where the fractal curves.

[Super Polymath]

Okay, then define that n what is that n when C - C = 0 , what is changing at that point?

The 2.something edge of our fractal dimension curves, wrapping around it's negative 2.something dimensional counterpart in anti-desitter space, creating gravity & anti-gravity.

[Vmedvil]

The 2.something edge of our fractal dimension curves, wrapping around it's negative 2.something dimensional counterpart in anti-desitter space, creating gravity & anti-gravity.

 

Define "Anti Gravity"

[Super Polymath]

Define "Anti Gravity"

The cosmological constant. Edited November 10, 2017 by Super Polymath

[Vmedvil]

The force behind the cosmological constant.

 

This is the best I can do.

 

[Vmedvil]

This is the best I can do.

 

 

Define L now.

[Super Polymath]

Idk if that helps in predicting the survival probability.