Updates On A Toy Model Of Gravity

[Vmedvil]

Its right here in this equation.

 

Secondly, I imagine it would stack here.

 

 

Okay, Final Solution it is perfect this time I had forgotten parts of it several times, if p = 2, q = 1 then C *- 691.641346728 being the solution for the set as D-branes are p = 2 which means you would be going 207,348,859,390.017377424 meters per second exactly or .000006719718892405765773 parsecs per second which is about .00001519704745830918364158588 ly per second and strangely it doesn't violate anything in this universe as all the C's in that equation dilate by the same amount. 

 

E₈ = ∇E_b(t,k,m,R,M,I,x,y,z) = ∇(1/((1-(((2M_bG / R_s) - (I_sω_A²/2M_b)+V)²/C²))^1/2))M_bC²

 

E₈ = ∇E_b(t,k,m,R,M,I,x,y,z) = ∇(1/((1-(((2M_bG / R_s) - (I_sω_B²/2M_b)+V)²/C²))^1/2))M_bC²

 

Then L ≈ m

 

Where ω² = k² + m²

 

Programming that equation was annoying which is in killing form making it a E₈

 

as ∇ * L = 0

Edited November 13, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

Okay, Final Solution it is perfect this time I had forgotten parts of it several times, if p = 2, q = 1 then C *- 691.641346728 being the solution for the set as D-branes are p = 2 which means you would be going 207,348,859,390.017377424 meters per second exactly or .000006719718892405765773 parsecs per second which is about .00001519704745830918364158588 ly per second and strangely it doesn't violate anything in this universe as all the C's in that equation dilate by the same amount. 

 

E₈ = ∇E_b(t,k,m,R,M,I,x,y,z) = ∇(1/((1-(((2M_bG / R_s) - (I_sω_A²/2M_b)+V)²/C²))^1/2))M_bC²

 

E₈ = ∇E_b(t,k,m,R,M,I,x,y,z) = ∇(1/((1-(((2M_bG / R_s) - (I_sω_B²/2M_b)+V)²/C²))^1/2))M_bC²

 

Then L ≈ m

 

Where ω² = k² + m²

 

Programming that equation was annoying which is in killing form making it a E₈

 

as ∇ * L = 0

 

This was found to be still too simple not taking account for variables, In any case, also it does not merge with Dubblesoix's equation like I thought being different SU(n) Groups this is discussion is finished please refer to http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/30658-a-type-of-gravitational-schrodinger-equation-and-the-minimum-distance-vs-the-phase-space/ for dubblesiox's stuff and I have to rework my equation found to not be invariant still as I had originally thought, Sorry Dubblesiox for the Hijack past the first couple of posts.

Edited November 22, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Shustaire]

Your using your E8 tensor wrong. Here is the Calculus rules on tensors

 

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.01660.pdf

[Vmedvil]

Your using your E8 tensor wrong. Here is the Calculus rules on tensors

 

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1603.01660.pdf

I know I was I was trying to find a way to absorb Dubblesoix's equation back then for Hillbert space.

 

Continued here to a solution http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/111607-wormhole-metric-how-is-this-screwed-up/

Edited January 7, 2018 by Vmedvil

[Vmedvil]

Fitting into EFE _ab form or vice versa.

 

k²  = K = (1/2)R