exchemist Posted January 19, 2018 Report Posted January 19, 2018 Just so we know who we are dealing with, this poster has had many incarnations, due to being banned so frequently: Geon, Aethelwulf, Luscious, Graviphoton, Tom Vose, Trapped Light, Tsadi, SimonsCat...and Reiku, plus probably many more. Bans are generally for incontinent mathematical scribbling with no meaning. Most recently banned (as Geon) from Sciforums(.com) 6th Sept 2017: http://sciforums.com/threads/towards-ideas-on-a-quantum-theory-of-gravity.159827/page-7#post-3475455 and as Dubbelosix from Science Forums (.net) on 4th Dec 2107: http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/29763-bannedsuspended-users/?page=22 And who is now accusing me of lying about these events on another thread in this forum. I don't generally like to make this kind of post, but feel on this occasion, as I am accused of being a liar, I ought at least to document the facts I am relying on.
LaurieAG Posted January 19, 2018 Report Posted January 19, 2018 exechemist, if you analyse the like/dislike to post ratio of the various different usernames you will see that there are several groupings of names that have similar rates (positive or negative) within the grouping so it could actually be posts from more than one person.
exchemist Posted January 20, 2018 Author Report Posted January 20, 2018 (edited) exechemist, if you analyse the like/dislike to post ratio of the various different usernames you will see that there are several groupings of names that have similar rates (positive or negative) within the grouping so it could actually be posts from more than one person. However these are not my judgments but those of the moderation teams on three independent forums. My understanding is that forum moderation generally has access to data we users do not possess, such as IP addresses. Anyway, it's not a big deal: I started this thread just to defend myself a bit and to get any further argument away from poor Julian M's thread. He was understandably baffled by the sudden appearance of hostile and off-topic posts. Edited January 20, 2018 by exchemist
exchemist Posted March 20, 2018 Author Report Posted March 20, 2018 (edited) Reiku/Dubbelosix banned yet again from sciforums today, after trying to come back as a sock called "Study", and all his mathematical "knitting" deleted. Edited March 20, 2018 by exchemist
exchemist Posted August 13, 2018 Author Report Posted August 13, 2018 AAAAaaaaa........... [into the void]........ Reiku banned yet again from sciforums: http://www.sciforums.com/threads/is-poincarés-conjecture-related-to-cmb-cosmology.161004/#post-3535896
Dubbelosix Posted August 13, 2018 Report Posted August 13, 2018 AAAAaaaaa........... [into the void]........ Reiku banned yet again from sciforums: http://www.sciforums.com/threads/is-poincarés-conjecture-related-to-cmb-cosmology.161004/#post-3535896 It's far more amusing seeing the trolls get ahead of themselves. When they openly shun things they have no understanding about. There is a small population of people out there who will see through those accusations and the rest are fooled, even some of the mods, like Kitamaru. Liked how he said he asked the moderators and he got no reply back, seemingly then takes it upon himself, like he did last time. And you were fundamental to both bannings, just because you could.
exchemist Posted August 18, 2018 Author Report Posted August 18, 2018 It's far more amusing seeing the trolls get ahead of themselves. When they openly shun things they have no understanding about. There is a small population of people out there who will see through those accusations and the rest are fooled, even some of the mods, like Kitamaru. Liked how he said he asked the moderators and he got no reply back, seemingly then takes it upon himself, like he did last time. And you were fundamental to both bannings, just because you could. I don't like deceit, as when someone pretends to be someone else, in order to break the rules of a forum. Nor do I like incontinent mathematical scribbling. So yes, I'm always up for a chance to help get you banned again. :)
exchemist Posted November 11, 2018 Author Report Posted November 11, 2018 Reiku (Dubbelosix) banned yet again from the Science Forum yesterday, this time under the name "Graviphenom".
exchemist Posted February 28, 2019 Author Report Posted February 28, 2019 Reiku (Dubbelosix) banned again today from Sciforums , this time under the name Route666, within 24hrs of posting more crap about bivector gravity etc. Flummoxed 1
Dubbelosix Posted February 28, 2019 Report Posted February 28, 2019 Crap about subjects you know nothing about. You're such a jealous creature.
exchemist Posted February 28, 2019 Author Report Posted February 28, 2019 How many forums has he been banned from, that you know off ?Well there's cosmoquest, the science forum .com, ditto .net and then sciforums. I expect there are others but those are just the ones I know about. The issue is more the number of attempted returns under sockpuppet names, after being banned for posting incoherent rubbish. You will see that when I started this thread a year ago I listed 9 names and that was not an exhaustive list. Since then there have been about half a dozen new attempts, that I am aware of. He's been at it for over a decade now. I think it must be obsessional. He was going to cut back and write a book, wasn't he? But yet couldn't help trying yet again to post more stuff on sciforums yesterday, in spite of himself. So I reported him and he's gone again. It's like Whack-a-mole. Reiku has even outlasted the spontaneous combustion nut we used to have (Lisa L, Gaia Girl, Frank Baker etc, he of the famous exploding thymus gland.)
exchemist Posted February 28, 2019 Author Report Posted February 28, 2019 You are giving out false information, you call a theory crap and I am quite sure you don't know anything about it. I was banned, from two forums, the two notably that you mention, not because I posted ''crap'' but because I did not hold my tongue after repeated warnings about my ''aggressive attitude'' online. When you have enough trolls around talking about subjects they clearly don't understand, then it becomes an issue for me. A good example is your extraordinary comments on zero point fields, which by the way, you haven't attempted to defend yourself in the thread I created - I wonder why that is.It is 4 (four) forums, not two, and those are only the ones I know of. And on the .net forum and sciforums between them, you have been banned not once but at least a dozen times over. I have made no comment on "zero point fields", whatever they may be. You are having your habitual - and selective - comprehension trouble again. I explained why you were in error in thinking that zero point energy contributes to temperature. But I'm not going through all that again. It has all been said, so there is zero point. Good luck with the book. I hope it is not about science.
exchemist Posted February 28, 2019 Author Report Posted February 28, 2019 Readers will doubtless draw their own conclusions.
exchemist Posted February 28, 2019 Author Report Posted February 28, 2019 I am strongly suspecting Autism or Aspergers Syndrome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome . Bingo!
Vmedvil2 Posted March 1, 2019 Report Posted March 1, 2019 (edited) I got banned from the scienceforums for thread hijacking after I said I was leaving so it is not that hard to get banned from those forums not that I mind. They are pretty ban happy. Edited March 1, 2019 by VictorMedvil
exchemist Posted March 1, 2019 Author Report Posted March 1, 2019 I got banned from the scienceforums for thread hijacking after I said I was leaving so it is not that hard to get banned from those forums not that I mind. They are pretty ban happy.Well of course you did: you're barking.
fahrquad Posted March 3, 2019 Report Posted March 3, 2019 Does anyone here proof-read their posts before sending or is Engrish a second language? <_<
Recommended Posts