inverse Posted March 11, 2018 Report Posted March 11, 2018 (edited) the formula here is sin(K)= 1.22.(X/D) , why is the constant here taken 1.22? I have found that the amount of light is stronger at the first circle so ,it is said to be taken 1.22 but is this information of? Edited March 11, 2018 by inverse Quote
exchemist Posted March 11, 2018 Report Posted March 11, 2018 ..and she very imprudently married the barber. Quote
inverse Posted March 11, 2018 Author Report Posted March 11, 2018 oh ,exchemist ,what do you mean ?what is the relation with my query ? Quote
exchemist Posted March 12, 2018 Report Posted March 12, 2018 oh ,exchemist ,what do you mean ?what is the relation with my query ?What query? Quote
inverse Posted March 12, 2018 Author Report Posted March 12, 2018 (edited) above.probably you had posted to incorrect topic. Edited March 12, 2018 by inverse Quote
exchemist Posted March 12, 2018 Report Posted March 12, 2018 (edited) above.probably you had posted to incorrect topic.No. Your opening post appeared to be gibberish, so I replied in kind. "Why 1.22 at Rayleigh criterion" is not even a sentence, let alone a clear question. What are you talking about? And what does it have to do with biology (you posted in the biology section)? Edited March 12, 2018 by exchemist Quote
inverse Posted March 12, 2018 Author Report Posted March 12, 2018 (edited) sorry for topic. the rayleigh criterion is about eye. it is used for seperation of two different points. whether they are separate or not.I am asking the reason for a constant (1.22,why it is 1.22) in the equation given above. Edited March 12, 2018 by inverse Quote
inverse Posted March 12, 2018 Author Report Posted March 12, 2018 (edited) I have found something here: http://what-when-how.com/remote-sensing-from-air-and-space/diffraction-limits-the-rayleigh-criterion-visible-imagery-remote-sensing/ but these are not sufficient. furthermore this was a homework at master level,but the time is over. I approximately presented the information given in the link but if you want to continue discussion ,well thank you. Edited March 12, 2018 by inverse Quote
exchemist Posted March 12, 2018 Report Posted March 12, 2018 sorry for topic. the rayleigh criterion is about eye. it is used for seperation of two different points. whether they are separate or not.I am asking the reason for a constant (1.22,why it is 1.22) in the equation given above.Oh I see. Thanks for clarifying. I had to look up Rayleigh Criterion, but I now understand. It is the diffraction-limited resolution of any optical system. Rayleigh's criterion for 2 sources being resolved is that the separation of the images is at or greater than the separation at which the first minimum in the diffraction pattern from one source lies on top of the central maximum of the diffraction pattern of the other object. So this is in fact physics, rather than biology, though as you say it will apply to the eye. The 1.22 factor applies only to diffraction from a circular opening (as opposed to a slit, for instance) and arises from some very complicated mathematics involving Bessel functions. I suspect this is why the derivation of the factor does not seem to be given in the usual places on the web, such as Wiki. I suppose you know all that by now, but I thought it was worth reciting here for the benefit of any other readers. :) Quote
inverse Posted March 14, 2018 Author Report Posted March 14, 2018 yes ,I know these now. but thank you for scientific conversation and yes I also think that is benefit to others Quote
exchemist Posted March 15, 2018 Report Posted March 15, 2018 yes ,I know these now. but thank you for scientific conversation and yes I also think that is benefit to othersBy the way, I notice in your footer than you say E=mc² is wrong. Would that be because the full expression is E² = (mc²)² +p²c², or for some other reason? Quote
inverse Posted March 15, 2018 Author Report Posted March 15, 2018 (edited) By the way, I notice in your footer than you say E=mc² is wrong. Would that be because the full expression is E² = (mc²)² +p²c², or for some other reason? no. your equation is approximate or contains approximation. mine is about my incomplete project (interdisciplinary). Edited March 15, 2018 by inverse Quote
exchemist Posted March 15, 2018 Report Posted March 15, 2018 no. your equation is approximate or contains approximation. mine is about my incomplete project (interdisciplinary). Why do you think it is an approximation? Please provide the reasoning and an idea of what extra terms are required for it to be accurate. Quote
inverse Posted March 16, 2018 Author Report Posted March 16, 2018 (edited) 1)Why do you think it is an approximation? 2)Please provide the reasoning and an idea of what extra terms are required for it to be accurate. Dear Editor Can you help me ,I cannot use latex code. I write [tex] [/tex] but it does not run ???? [math] m = \gamma m_0 = \frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} [/math] still it does not run :( Edited May 19, 2018 by inverse Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.