On Gravitoelectric And Gravitomagnetic (Coriolis) Forces

[Dubbelosix]

A collection of work recently, keep updated for the remaining three parts to be installed into my blog:

 

1) https://consciousness1.quora.com/Analogies-between-Gravity-and-Electromagnetism-Part-One

 

2) https://consciousness1.quora.com/Analogies-between-Gravity-and-Electromagnetism-Part-Two

 

3) https://consciousness1.quora.com/Analogies-between-Gravity-and-Electromagnetism-Part-Three

 

 

 

Hope everyone is ok. Summer is coming.

[Super Polymath]

A collection of work recently, keep updated for the remaining three parts to be installed into my blog:

 

1) https://consciousness1.quora.com/Analogies-between-Gravity-and-Electromagnetism-Part-One

 

2) https://consciousness1.quora.com/Analogies-between-Gravity-and-Electromagnetism-Part-Two

 

3) https://consciousness1.quora.com/Analogies-between-Gravity-and-Electromagnetism-Part-Three

 

 

 

Hope everyone is ok. Summer is coming.

Behind the spectral aspect is a holographic quantum foam.

 

What's projecting that wave spectrum into the foam is an aggregate of smaller patterns with same spectral structure but vastly miniaturised and far less stable (existing in a hypertime, the opposite of time dilation) - this is where scale relativity is needed keeping in mind that weaker "gravitation" can propagate at C in reduced spacetime where stronger can't (which was why the speed of light was slower in the primordial cloud of dust and gas 13 billion years ago a time when the universe was denser, & the speed of light was slower due to more spectral interference in the photons, what if virtual particles turn into photons, & photons turn into electrons, & electrons turn into atomic nuclei & vice versa based on thermodynamics?). What if energy, matter, & mass are illusions caused by an inversive geometric fluctuation (fluctuations that transcend plancks constant) in spacetime?

 

What if zero can be considered both as a real number temporarily, and an irrational number temporarily? Negative inversion=black hole, positive inversion=white hole, consider these as the qubits that make up our reality. Black holes & white holes reduce one another, they are dimensionally inversive, meaning there are points that temporarily don't exist in two realities that are the inverse of each other.

Edited March 14, 2018 by Super Polymath

[Super Polymath]

The curl doesn't have to vanish in order to vanish. This particular paradox was first proposed by zeno. One can't cross a room if they can only go 1/2 of their previous step. Zeno's paradox was solved by Mandelbrot, the line of thinking that 3 dimensions isn't ever fully achieved, but yet is worked toward (Mandelbrot's was an evolving set). I don't think it's a new physics, Mandelbrot's idea for the fractal dimension came from older works on the issue that predates Einstein. Einstein wrote "space without the [...non-newtonian, locally real, spacetime...] ether is unthinkable".

 

Yet Einstein's theoretical spacetime ether was never disclosed until scale relativity was proposed by others, a theory in which which required Mandelbrot's math to realize almost a century later. Infinite & everlasting rotation in such a model requires true antimatter. No, not negative particle charge, but something like ADS which was proposed by William j Sidis' reverse universe in the only other theory (besides Einstein's) that predicted the existence of black holes. You see true anti-matter doesn't annihilate "matter", it nullifies reality. Gravity & all fundamental interactions, & even expansion, could be caused by one singular mechanism. Just like how gravity is the attraction of bodies, a reduction in space time from the nullification of apart of a universe universe & it's reverse counterpart could cause aggregation of bodies, which could cause entropy, which could cause an endless cycle of rotation which is based upon a non vanishing torsional property.

 

But such nullification both is, & yet is not, possible. The vanishing is real, but irrational. Refer to the first sentence of this post.

Edited March 16, 2018 by Super Polymath

[Super Polymath]

Gravitational electromagnetism in it's earliest form was Einstein's proposed teleparallel gravity, but he never worked it out, just like his proposed spacetime ether the theory was a mystery. However elements of both propositions made by Einstein (& even Sidis' brief endeavor in cosmogeny to explain the second law of thermodynamics & how it relates consciousness) can be found in scale relativity,bohmian mechanical pilot wave theory, & ads/cft duality.

 

But field theories have vanishing torsion, so the ads/cft must be complimented by scale relativity in order to accommodate the pilot wave theory.

 

Is reality non-local, statistical chaos, or is it determinable, is it based on moving through the space between point a & point b? Gravity is a wave, LIGO has confirmed this, it's no field - & even the very double slit experiment suggests the existence of a photon aether in pilot wave theory. Such a pilot needs to exist on another level, fractal zoom suggests that the structures would act the same & even repeat, existing in smaller briefer states, more of them, projecting the larger structures that are the same as the selves, but lasting longer & existing in fewer numbers (Cantor's infinity). This lorentz repeating scalar law is well-defined in the cellular automata interpretation proposed by Gerard t'Hooft, another proponent of aether theory.

 

What do you think, 006? Really, I'd like your feedback on my feedback in regards to this new physics which I propose as one consequence of the concepts you're addressing here.

Edited March 16, 2018 by Super Polymath