Deleterious Inversive Di-Brane (Did) Theory This Time Finds Dark Energy & Dark Matter And Unifies Gravity With The Fundamental Forces

[Super Polymath]

The Fundamental Interactions

I hypothesize that the quantum eraser is the only fundamental interaction. This interaction being between two boundless branes that are perpendicular to, and that are the corporeal reverse of, one another. This comes from William James Sidis' The Animate and The Inanimate, wherein he becomes the second polymathematical savant to predict the existence of black holes after Einstein. His black hole was different than Einstein's, it was a shard of a reverse universe, existing perpendicular to our own.

That is the black hole in this theory, but this theory goes far more into speculative depth, which leads to an equation that yields Einstein's tensor when accounting for frame dragging, because v(g) will equal c.

What I am about to describe using a series of thought experiments is really a metaphor for the true state of things. Things may be more fundamentally classical than the BBT would have you believe, but they may be more or less oversimplified in the following thought experiment. However, what I'm about to imagine with you as a metaphor for the true nature of reality really was necessary in order to build an equation for the quantum eraser per unit measured.

https://ibb.co/dL4Yhx

The black spots are white on one side of the plane, and the white spots are black on the other side.

Imagine that these circles on an infinite inversive di-plane begin to grow a third dimension suddenly. Now picture the thing from pack man chomping it's mouth. That's what the circles will look like as they grow a third dimension. Viewed from the flat part of the plane (making the circles into just lines), this chomping action of the line into circle moves with a velocity equal to the speed of light until a sphere is formed.

The smaller lines/circles/spheres between them are copied as sections are added to the larger circle as it becomes spherical.

Imagine the replication of not only the fractal qubits between the regular qubits, but the fractals of their fractals as well, ad infinitum. There is theoretically a point where the fractals of two different normal qubits connect as the qubits' doubly, or triply (ad infinitum), fractized counterparts branch off to fill every single gap of space created by the curve of separated circles.

Eventually the fractals of two different circles touch at infinitely small scales. It's like Zeno's paradox. Imagine trying to cross a room by only taking 1/2 of the previous step, it happens after infinite time.

You may be wondering how there can be horizontally adjacent spheres as the brane forms from a plane (in which there can be only vertically adjacent circles because two dimensional space has no depth). Well, two concepts, one is time as the third dimension that adds depth, the other is infinity.

Cantor's infinity is why you don't need a fourth dimension as one finite brane moves through time to create a finite superbrane. You only need one sheet, one 2D plane, to fold into the third dimension, on each inversive-side of reality:

That's because the pacman chomper effect you'd see looking at the plane from the perspective where it's infinitely thin line, means the vertical circles are stacked infinitely high & infinitely low, eventually there's going to be bigger spheres growing: a process that will copy the forming vertical spheres from a flat 2 dimensional perspective, that you had in mind, except copied horizontally. This adds infinite more planes in front of the first one.

https://imgur.com/lNbonxw

Contact between white qubit & black qubit leads to zero, equitable nullification of both inverse branes. This is the essence of gravitation, the original pull that begins the infinite torsional pendulum of spacetime & matter-energy, how our cosmos appears to revolve at every level. Also why the white holes wrap around black holes like a hollow sphere (and in ADS, the inverted of this di-brane, the black holes form a hollow sphere around the white holes & black is the new white), until the black hole dissolves the hollow spherical quasar around it & vice versa. *This process is why local increases in thermal density will eventually increase entropy locally as well.

(*That's how energy conservation is temporarily broken, that's why every antiproton becomes a proton & why there seems to be more matter than antimatter. It takes longer for entropically fleeting energy to aggregate into matter than for matter to break apart into energy*)

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/153b/ab77fdb0476030acb2e5a4ad2b54cae658da.pdf

The speed of light in this theory will be relative, not constant, because my f(n) equation will yield a fraction, & that means it will employ fractal geometry. As the addition of luminal velocities can become superluminal only in two dimensional space, it can also be superluminal within any dimension that's less than 3.

There's somewhere between 4 & 6 real physical dimensions of the perpendicular & inversive di-brane at any given point in space and time, so:

~|2x|+/-~|2x|=n, 6>n>4 & 2>x>1

f(n)=(λmax)•((4π/3)r^3)

c=c•x where f(x)=6/(n/(4π/3)^(1/3)) where n>6

c=c•x where f(x)=4/(n/(4π/3)^(1/3)) where 4>n

n=the speed of gravitational wave propagation

n also equals the pilot waves (Bohmian mechanics)

The microscopic pilot wave is an aggregate of infinitessimal quantum eraser phenomenons, gravity itself is a collection of pilot waves.

When culminated with the Quantum Eraser effect seen in the Quantum Eraser experiment, my f(n) equation mathematically supports the existence of a changing inversive dimension such as the 4-6 inverse dimensional di-brane in my hypothesis when applied to measuring the speed of light through various mediums in the real universe:

Ex.)

How fast is the speed of light in a dense medium such as the heart of the sun?

C at the center of the sun (which is 160 billion times denser than the surface) is 0.00551512557 m/s (covering the sun's radius in 4,000 years spending the vast majority of that time in the core).

My equation gives the average speed of light throughout the entire sun in m/s:

I found lambda max for the sun online:
http://studylib.net/doc/18286845/hw-solution

Link says 504 nm, or 5.04 x 10^-7 meters

f(n)=(5.04 x 10^-7)(((4π/3)(*695,700,000)^3)

*Radius of the sun in meters

f(n)=7.1086177 x 10^20

c(f(n))=c•x where f(x)=6/(n/(4π/3)^(1/3)) where n>6

c(f(n))=299,792,458(6/(7.1086177e+20/(4π/3))^(1/3))

c(f(n))=325 m/s

The speed of light 13.5 billion years ago was around a million times slower due to ions.

.

The entire universe was about as dense as the sun, so the speed of light during the CMB & my measurements on the average speed of light from the inner layers of the sun to the outer layers of the sun, are about the same.

For the average velocity to be in the hundreds of meters per second with a starting velocity in the hundredths of meters per second means that the speed of light would have to increase by 4 orders of magnitude when it escapes the inner layer of a star, & then from there light would increase by 6 orders of magnitude, back to normal speeds, as light escapes the outer layer of a star.

Regarding the universe's current density, on the very large scale, the illusion of gravity c(f(n)) is a few percents faster because the volume area is massive yet not very dense at all, lambda max is a high integer on that scale, all that free redshifted entropy. This is why expansion overcomes light on that scale.

Ex)

λmax of background radiation is 1.07 mm, a radius of superluminal galactic expansion is like distance between milky way & Andromeda, 2.5 million light years

f(n)=(0.00107)(((4pi/3)(2.3651826181452 x 10^22))^3)

f(n)=1.0405037 x 10^66

f(n)>6,

c(f(n))=(299,792,458)(6/((1.0405037 x 10^66)/(4pi/3))^(1/3))

c(f(n))=2.8614552 x 10^-13 m/s

This will be used as mathematical evidence for dark energy as the result of superluminal gravity waves from beyond the known universe later.

On the very small, the width of a hydrogen atom within the pseudo energies of the sinusoidal waveform of a photon in the virtual blueshift of Earth's atmosphere, lambda max is equally miniscule, so faster than light. We see this phenomenon in neutrinos, cherenkov radiation & entangled particles.

Ex)

λmax of chloranil radical anion = 450 nm. Elements such as these would have a radius of about 79 picometers.

f(n)=(4.5 x 10^-7)(((4pi/3)(7.9 x 10^-11)^3)

f(n)=9.2935662 x 10^-37

Recall;

c(f(n))=c•x, f(x)=4/(n/(4pi/3)^3) where 4>n

c(f(n))=299,792,458(4/(9.2935662e-37/(4π/3)^(1/3))

c(f(n))=2.0799896 x 10^45 m/s

So it would require very faint gravity to overcome the speed of light within that range at that low level of thermodynamic conductivity. This is where we come into pilot g waves (micro expansion), which carry cherenkov radiation, neutrinos, & which also entangle particles (atomic nuclei) at that level. According to fiber optic measurements, c(f(n)) for these faint pilot waves would have to be 2.0799896 x 10^-49 m/s in order to overcome gravity & entangle particles at that range. So how is QE possible? We will get to that later as well.

The pilot wave (n) on our cosmic scale should be accurate enough to see how the pilot wave effects QED, that should be enough data when culminated with electron holography & laser inferometer readings on thermodynamic fluctuations in the quantum foam between point a & point b cubic volumes in the spacetime foam to predict the outcome of quantum controlled, wave piloted chain reactions between entangled particles. Enough so that one could send messages back & forth this way. This makes modern satellite communication like a messenger pigeon by comparison.

The Cosmology

Let's talk about this thing,

http://sci.esa.int/science-e-media/img/45/i_screenimage_18245.jpg

This is a primordial cloud of gas & cosmic dust. It's heavy in most place, tremendously so. Everything is so compact that it's causing interference patterns in photons, enough so that they travel slower. Hopefully it's the result of QED interference, because if not that would mean light has mass

There's no proof that the universe was ever more dense than here. No proof of zero time, no proof of a big bang. For almost a century it's been well-documented that there exists mass beyond the CMB.

Now there's more evidence than ever, cosmic bruising, dark flow, etc. That matter would now be over 600 billion light years away.

Some of the missing baryonic matter from the missing Baryon problem might still be missing:

"The initial measurements still do not account for all the ordinary matter, and some believe the remaining portion could be made up by exotic unobserved objects such as black holes or dark stars. Cosmologists are also still yet to discover the nature of dark matter, which makes up even more of the universe."

This could be wayward extra-cosmic galaxies from the source of the extra-cosmic GWs traveling into our cosmic domain, or at least a gravitational domino effect in the gravitational chain-link of galaxies tugging us (modern dark flow), initiating the first phase of the big crunch, so the expansion of the CMB could be the result of GWs from beyond the known universe.

Gravity is not a static field, Newtonian expansion shows that frame dragging is a constant. GWs propagate at the speed of light (demonstrated by LIGO in 2017), so GW expansion (given it's the same as the current rate of expansion) involves the addition of luminal velocities for scale relativity: there could be superluminal GWs! Consider for a moment that if adjacent bodies are in a later state of expansion than the fully expanded CMB is now, than just as the current speed of light is faster than it was 13 billion years ago, the speed of GWs propagating from those ultra-low density, ludicrously wide bodies could be faster than anything you could imagine due to scale relativity, time becomes triply relative, quadruply relative, ad infinitum, to us.

The fastest GWs have traveled the farthest to get here and have therefore lost the most strength. This gravitation doesn't have to be able to overcome mass to cause the expansion of the universe. This is because of the holographic principle, but we'll get to that.

Extra-cosmic gravitation would be unreadable, because we're closer to the stronger sources, & further from the weaker sources, yet the thing stretching the vacuum of space out is the amount by which the stronger gravity is winning the tug of war against the weaker gravity. Picture that.

From this picture we can derive equations in order to define the effects that this extra-cosmic gravitation will have on our cosmos:

The stronger GWs win the tug of war over the weaker GWs, so we can attribute 68% of missing mass to their effects as they travel 27% of the length of total GWs involved in expansion, losing less strength as they get here at the same time as the GWs we attribute to 27% of the missing mass pulling from the opposite direction having traveled 68% of the length of total GWs involved in expansion.

Recall earlier that the velocity of light dilates by 299792458/2.8614552e-13 over 2.5 million light years. Therefore, the speed of light is only viable over a distance of 2500000(9.461e+15)/1.0476923e+21=22.5758078016 meters in a near perfect vacuum (lambda max of the vacuum)

Length of strong GWs (where v(g)=c) = 22.5758078016 x 299792458 = 6768056912.18 meters

Total Length of GWs = length of the strong GWs/.05 = 135361138244 meters

Length of left weak GWs = length of GWs x .27 = 36547507325.9 meters

length of right weak GWs = length of GWs x .68 = 92045574005.9 meters

Velocity of left weak gravitational waves = length of left weak GWs/length of strong GWs times the speed of light = 1618879273.21 m/s

Velocity of right weak gravitational waves = length of right weak GWs/length of strong GWs times the speed of light = 4077177428.81 m/s

Velocity of right weak GWs/velocity of left weak GWs = rate of expansion in a vacuum over total length of GWs = 2.51851851851 m/s

Now the speed of light over the total length of GWs is found in the same way we found the speed of light over the length of 2.5 million light years:

λmax of background radiation is 1.07 mm, the radius for total length of GWs = 135361138244/2 meters

f(n)=(0.00107)(((4pi/3)(67680569122))^3)

f(n)=12.4380444e+31

f(n)>6,

c(f(n))=(299,792,458)(6/((2.4380444e+31)/(4pi/3))^(1/3))

c(f(n))=0.09999714934 meters

Now we can find the velocity increases of c for every 22.5758078016 meter increase in the length of the GW with rate of expansion for total length of GWs = 2.51851851851 / the speed of light over total length of GWs = 0.09999714934 = +25.1859031496 m/s per 22.5758078016 meters.


Let’s see if that checks out, 2500000(9.461e+15) = 2.36525e+22 meters. 2.36525e+22/22.5758078016=1.0476923e+21 m/s. 299,792,458 + 25.1859031496(1.0476923e+21) = 2.6387077e+22 meters ✓s within approximation.

C dilates by 2.8614552e-13 over that same distance, 299,792,458/1.0476923e+21 = 2.8614552e-13 ✓
Okay moving on.

In this theory the universe has no outer boundary limit. So eventually matter arrangements will repeat within larger & smaller structures. Black hole evaporation will be used to find a higher & lower cosmic scales using the proton’s frequency rate of one billion times per second, the size of a proton is 10⁻¹⁵ m and the Schwarzchild radius of its central black hole will give you the rate at which black evaporates.

The Schwarzchild radius is 2.484e-54 meters (just type proton into where it says earth). The rate of evaporation is 8.41e-17 seconds (just type proton into where it says earth). That’s just the vanishing rate of the proton; oscillation frequency is more for how long it would take for another proton to form plus the time it took to evaporate. Protons form at a rate of 1e-9 - 8.41e-17 = 9.9999992e-10 seconds. Now that’s enough information to use in order to finally acquire enough evidence to either confirm or deny my hypothesis.


But protons do not have λmax of a vacuum, that’s the problem, so for a proton we must use the original equation f(n)=(λmax)•((4π/3)r^3);c=c•x where f(x)=4/(n/(4π/3)^(1/3)) where 4>n to find the contraction of c with the λmax of a proton ≈ 395 nm. However, in the special case of black holes the equation must be modified.

First of all, it’s 4πr^2 because the quasar within the Schwarzschild radius of the proton is a hollow sphere. Secondly, λmax of the proton’s quasar is the proton’s normal λmax but to the negative power of the proton’s length divided by twice the Schwarzschild radius

f(n)=(3.95e-7^-(1e-15/2(2.484e-54)))((4π)(2.484e-54)^2)=7.753772e-107

c(f(n))=4/(7.753772e-107/(4π))^(1/2) = 1.610306e+54 m/s

So a black hole with the mass of the sun (1391400000 meters) has a Schwarzschild radius of 2953 meters & will evaporate in 6.61e+74 seconds.

f(n)=(5.04e-7^-1(1.3914e+9/5906)) x ((4π x 2953)^3) = 2.3886249e+25 m/s

c(f(n))=6/(4π(2.3886249e+25^(1/2))=9.7693891e-14 m/s

1.610306e+54/299,792,458/9.7693891e-14=5.4981971e+58

5.4981971e+58/8.41e-17=6.5376898e+74 seconds ✓

Ladies & gentlemen we have ourselves a theory, & it states that a particle of energy is like an entire universe of matter, with a relatively equivalent amount of mass in adjusted scale. Fall anywhere in space, no matter how seemingly void, and you will land on matter if you're small enough:

empty space ought not be really empty. We have two good reasons to think so: first, electromagnetic signals behave undoubtedly as waves; since they propagate even through intergalactic space, there must be some thing there (everywhere), in which they do wave. Second, quantum theory predicts that vacuum has physical effects, such as the Casimir effect, which is now experimentally confirmed [1].

Gerard t'Hooft, another proponent of ether theory:

"Einstein had difficulties with the relativistic invariance of quantum mechanics (“does
the spooky information transmitted by these particles go faster than light?”). These,
however, are now seen as technical difficulties that have been resolved. It may be consid-
ered part of Copenhagen’s Doctrine, that the transmission of information over a distance
can only take place, if we can identify operators A at space-time point x1 and operators
B at space-time point x2 that do not commute: [A, B] 6= 0 . We now understand that, in
elementary particle theory, all space-like separated observables mutually commute, which
precludes any signalling faster than light. It is a built-in feature of the Standard Model,
to which it actually owes much of its success.
So, with the technical difficulties out of the way, we are left with the more essential
Einsteinian objections against the Copenhagen doctrine for quantum mechanics: it is a
probabilistic theory that does not tell us what actually is going on. It is sometimes even
suggested that we have to put our “classical” sense of logic on hold. Others deny that:
“Keep remembering what you should never ask, while reshaping your sense of logic, and
everything will be fine.” According to the present author, the Einstein-Bohr debate is not
over. A theory must be found that does not force us to redefine any aspect of classical,
logical reasoning.
What Einstein and Bohr did seem to agree about is the importance of the role of an
observer. Indeed, this was the important lesson learned in the 20th century: if something
cannot be observed, it may not be a well-defined concept – it may even not exist at all. We
have to limit ourselves to observable features of a theory. It is an important ingredient
of our present work that we propose to part from this doctrine, at least to some extent:
Things that are not directly observable may still exist and as such play a decisive role
in the observable properties of an object. They may also help us to construct realistic
models of the world.
Indeed, there are big problems with the dictum that everything we talk about must be
observable. While observing microscopic objects, an observer may disturb them, even in
a classical theory; moreover, in gravity theories, observers may carry gravitational fields
that disturb the system they are looking at, so we cannot afford to make an observer
infinitely heavy (carrying large bags full of “data”, whose sheer weight gravitationally
disturbs the environment), but also not infinitely light (light particles do not transmit
large amounts of data at all), while, if the mass of an observer would be “somewhere in between”, ."

More evidence:

The situation is somewhat different when we consider gravity and promote the Lorentz violating tensors to dynamical objects. For example in an aether theory, where Lorentz violation is described by a timelike four vector, the four vector can twist in such a way that local superluminal propagation can lead to energy-momentum flowing around closed paths [206]. However, even classical general relativity admits solutions with closed time like curves, so it is not clear that the situation is any worse with Lorentz violation. Furthermore, note that in models where Lorentz violation is given by coupling matter fields to a non-zero, timelike gradient of a scalar field, the scalar field also acts as a time function on the spacetime. In such a case, the spacetime must be stably causal (c.f. [272]) and there are no closed timelike curves. This property also holds in Lorentz violating models with vectors if the vector in a particular solution can be written as a non-vanishing gradient of a scalar. Finally, we mention that in fact many approaches to quantum gravity actually predict a failure of causality based on a background metric [121] as in quantum gravity the notion of a spacetime event is not necessarily well-defined [239]. A concrete realization of this possibility is provided in Bose-Einstein condensate analogs of black holes [40]. Here the low energy phonon excitations obey Lorentz invariance and microcausality [270]. However, as one approaches a certain length scale (the healing length of the condensate) the background metric description breaks down and the low energy notion of microcausality no longer holds.

----

In the Bohmian view, nonlocality is even more conspicuous. The trajectory of any one particle depends on what all the other particles described by the same wave function are doing. And, critically, the wave function has no geographic limits; it might, in principle, span the entire universe. Which means that the universe is weirdly interdependent, even across vast stretches of space.

----

The hole is quantum-mechanically unstable: It has no bound states. Wormhole wave functions must eventually leak to large radii. This suggests that stability considerations along these lines may place strong constraints on the nature and even the existence of spacetime foam.

----

In invariant set theory, the form of the Bell Inequality whose violation would be inconsistent with realism and local causality is undefined, and the form of the inequality that it violated experimentally is not even gp-approximately close to the form needed to rule out local realism (54) [21]. A key element in demonstrating this result derives from the fact that experimenters cannot in principle shield their apparatuses from the uncontrollable ubiquitous gravitational waves that fill space-time.

----

A finite non-classical framework for physical theory is described which challenges the conclusion that the Bell Inequality has been shown to have been violated experimentally, even approximately. This framework postulates the universe as a deterministic locally causal system evolving on a measure-zero fractal-like geometry IU in cosmological state space. Consistent with the assumed primacy of IU , and p-adic number theory, a non-Euclidean (and hence non-classical) metric gp is defined on cosmological state space, where p is a large but finite Pythagorean prime. Using numbertheoretic properties of spherical triangles, the inequalities violated experimentally are shown to be gp-distant from the CHSH inequality, whose violation would rule out local realism. This result fails in the singular limit p = ∞, at which gp is Euclidean. Broader implications are discussed.

----

This optical pumping scenario is implicitly based on the erroneous quantum mechanical “myth” that quantum “jumps” are instantaneous. In reality transitions between atomic levels take very, very long times, about 10 million times longer than the oscillating period of the electromagnetic radiation that drives the excitation.

First, assuming that the electron/positron is a nanoscopic primordial CMB cloud (& it acts like one); we use its oscillation frequency to find the moment of the big crunch in our universe (which is basically caused by overlapped radiation from dissolving galaxies being sprayed by the matter jets (the magnetic dipole moments) or the outflows of its accretion disk (magnetic monopole moments) of a superverse proton) by using the dilation of c equation to find the adjustment to our relative time-frame for that frequency:

The electron most likely has a radius of 10^-12 m, & λmax of about 4e-7 m (visible spectrum is where electrons like to hide).

f(n)=(4e-7)(4π/3(1e-12)^3)=1.6755161e-42

c(f(n))=4/(1.6755161e-42/(12π^(1/3)))=4.1957466e+43 m/s

The CMB had a radius of 6.9 billion light years, or 6.52809e+28 meters, & λmax of about 1,000 nm.

f(n)=(1e-6)(4π/3(6.52809e+28)^3)=1.1653249e+81

c(f(n))=6/(12π(1.1653249e+81)^(1/3))=1.5124155e-28 m/s

4.1957466e+43/1.5124155e-28=2.7742023e+71 seconds

Or 8.7958221e+60 years, the few SMBHs caught in the big crunch will only be less than half-evaporated, so this can't be right! Grrr
So, we use the time contraction of c equation to find a much larger planck length to see how many electrons fit into a super electron, this will give us a new size for the CMB, so that this process can be redone for a more accurate date for the big crunch.

Okay, there's 6.52809e+28 meters in the radius of the CMB, using (4π/3(1e-12)^3), you can fit 1.165325e+123 electrons into the electrons of the next cosmic scale. Let's see if my math confirms that number using super lp:

2.7742023e+71/299,792,458/6.58e-15=1.4063439e+77 m/s. Planck length over planck time equals 296846011.132 m/s.

 

1.4063439e+77/296846011.132=4.737621e+68 m/s as your new planck length over planck time. 296846011.132 x 5.39e-44 equals lp, so super lp equals

 

1.4063439e+77 x 5.39e-44 = 7.5801936e+33 meters. 7.5801936e+33/4.737621e+68=1.6e-35, which is the planck length (lp). There's 3.125e+22 planck lengths in the length of an electron.

 

7.5801936e+33 x 3.125e+22 = 2.3688105e+56 meters for the superverse electron. Does not confirm, the CMB should be 2.3688105e+56/2=1.1844052e+56, 1.1844052e+56/6.52809e+28=1.8143212e+27 times larger than what we can see. We can't see so much of the CMB for the same reason we can't see forever into the past, it's from a combination of redshift & the fact that the ion interference makes light fade into oblivion eons before it gets near us. For our next dilation of c equation:

f(n)=(1e-6)(4π/3(1.1844052e+56)^3)=6.959684e+162 cubic meters

c(f(n))=6/(12π(6.959684e+162)^(1/3))=8.3359856e-56 m/s

4.1957466e+43/8.3359856e-56=5.033294e+98 seconds, which is 1.5958446e+88 years. Which fits for the evaporation rate for most supermassive black holes (<100 million solar masses). But the few that are the largest in the universe, such as this one, they may grow to become superverse protons during a second or third cosmic life cycle. In the microverse, proton formation could bind cosmic rays, allowing them to exist in the long treks through the expanding vacuum of space. This also explains dark matter from a microverse's perspective. Exceptionally large SMBHs that were too large to evaporate in the previous cosmic life cycle may be the origin of this primordial SMBH.

These protons are really just giant black holes in the microverse. The electromagnetic polar jets of radiation of the primordial CMB would be the polarity of a giant electron. The neutron is a monster of a neutron star in the microverse. Relatively nearby is the proton, if you're an observer within the microverse it's a quasar unlike anything you could imagine in power-scale, a gazillion times larger than that behemoth within the core of the IC 1101 galaxy (which is by far the largest SMBH we know about at 4e+10 to 10e+10 solar masses). The giant proton-quasar feeds the neutron, this kronos of a pulsar. Well, normally the pulsar feeds the quasar since the BH possesses a greater density of "mass", but most cases the proton is positively charged as opposed to the anti-proton.

Recall,

Contact between white qubit & black qubit leads to zero, equitable nullification of both inverse branes. This is the essence of gravitation, the original pull that begins the infinite torsional pendulum of spacetime & matter-energy, how our cosmos appears to revolve at every level. Also why the white holes wrap around black holes like a hollow sphere (and in ADS, the inside out of this M-brane, the black holes form a hollow sphere around the white holes & black is the new white), until the black hole dissolves the hollow spherical quasar around it & vice versa. *This process is why local increases in thermal density will eventually increase entropy locally as well.

(*That's how energy conservation is temporarily broken, that's why every antiproton becomes a proton & why there seems to be more matter than antimatter. It takes longer for entropically fleeting energy to aggregate into matter than for matter to break apart into energy*)

&

The Schwarzchild radius is 2.484e-54 meters (just type proton into where it says earth). The rate of evaporation is 8.41e-17 seconds (just type proton into where it says earth). That’s just the vanishing rate of the proton; oscillation frequency is more for how long it would take for another proton to form plus the time it took to evaporate. Protons form at a rate of 1e-9 - 8.41e-17 = 9.9999992e-10 seconds. Now that’s enough information to use in order to finally acquire enough evidence to either confirm or deny my hypothesis.

For most of its life, the anti/proton's quasar material is attracted to the neutron/micro-pulsar. Now, however, please note all neutron-proton nuclei begin their life-cycles with the proton actually being a negatively charged anti-proton in this Theory - but their life cycles end with the it being a normal positively charged proton feeding the neutron with matter emanating from the single down quark of the proton to the single up quark of the neutron before the cycle repeats with the reverse of that: with the neutron feeding the proton.

This means that its down quarks are a holographic compilation of magnetic dipole moments, the up quark is a hologram composed of a collection of briefer magnetic monopole moments - & vice versa for protons. Virtual particles aren't really what we think they are. Between negatively charged states, micro-expansion takes over, because positively charged protons are dispersing thermal picoscopic gasses, fleeting from evaporated black holes, & it takes a lot more time for new protons to form than to evaporate as shown during the oscillation frequency. This solves the antimatter problem.

https://i.imgur.com/YZFSQIy.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/ZWp0Ehz.jpg

This is much more versatile than QM, it works in explaining virtually any quantum effect. For instance, let's use the quantum venn diagram paradox;

https://i.imgur.com/VxO1oaS.jpg

The non-virtual photons adopt new polarities as they expand, aka wave, through the vacuum mediums of the quantum sub-foam microverse. More polarizing filters=greater variety of polarities.

Quark-gluon plasma is the absolute densest state matter can take. We see it in the cores of neutron stars, discs of quasars as matter is folded upon itself by compressing spacetime (gravity/mass/dark matter) around macro black holes, & in the cosmic microwave background radiation.

But in this hypothesis it's more like a black star in a fully classical, not just semiclassical, framework of gravity.

Any denser, & matter is just a macro black hole as there's no space between micro black holes. It's composed of micro quasars with micro black holes at their cores, barely held apart by micro expansion. Unlike vacuum radiation & the atomic world, these microverses are non-anthropic (no stellar eras) because less entropy equates to less complexity. Quark-gluon plasma is the only state of matter composed entirely of microverses that are exclusively the same as itself. Atoms & vacuum radiation will have microverses with atoms, quark-gluon plasma & vacuum radiation within them, quark-gluon plasma is only composed of microverses that are entirely filled with quark-gluon plasma.

Key Terms

• Local realism
• Quantum
  /
  /
  /
• anti/de sitter space/ADS/CFT duality
• fractal geometry/scale relativity/special relativity beyond the speed of light
• The transplanckian problem
• Dark Flow/Cosmic Bruising/CMB Primer

Edited April 2, 2018 by Super Polymath

[Super Polymath]

I want to look at how particles of different kinds might be entangled in this theory, or theories like it (006). 

 

Now this theory isn't in the normal form you'd see with it's lambdamax 4/3pi r cubed, but math is math & there's some debate as to whether the form of math we're accustomed is even real. In reality math is just the yin yang pattern of nature so my form's as good or real or accurate as any.

 

Earlier we determined that 

 

 

 

The CMB had a radius of 6.9 billion light years, or 6.52809e+28 meters, & λmax of about 1,000 nm.

f(n)=(1e-6)(4π/3(6.52809e+28)^3)=1.1653249e+81

c(f(n))=6/(12π(1.1653249e+81)^(1/3))=1.5124155e-28 m/s

 

However, we also determined that our observations o the CMB gave us only part of the picture

 

 

7.5801936e+33 x 3.125e+22 = 2.3688105e+56 meters for the superverse electron. Does not confirm, the CMB should be 2.3688105e+56/2=1.1844052e+56, 1.1844052e+56/6.52809e+28=1.8143212e+27 times larger than what we can see. We can't see so much of the CMB for the same reason we can't see forever into the past, it's from a combination of redshift & the fact that the ion interference makes light fade into oblivion eons before it gets near us. For our next dilation of c equation:

f(n)=(1e-6)(4π/3(1.1844052e+56)^3)=6.959684e+162 cubic meters

c(f(n))=6/(12π(6.959684e+162)^(1/3))=8.3359856e-56 m/s

 

So this superverse electron is 1.8143212e+27 x 13.8 billion light years. It's therefore 2.5037633e+37 light years in diameter, with a radius of 1.1844052e+53 meters.  So our dilation of c equation becomes 

 

f(n)=(1e-6)(4π/3(1.1844052e+53)^3)=6.959684e+153

 

c(f(n))=6/(12π(6.959684e+153)^(1/3))=8.3359856e-53 m/s

 

So, not only is the CMB expanding, not only is it a giant electron, not only is it spun by outside gravitational forces, but it also is going in one direction with a velocity, the gravitational waves propagating at the speed in which it's moving plus the speed at which gws propagate at a length of 2.3688104e+53 meters. We can determine from all of this the velocity at which particles become entangled in the superverse, & from that we can determine the velocity in which they become entangled in the subverse (sub-atomic world). 

 

The electron travels at 2,200 kilometers per second, Since the speed of light for a superversal electron is going to be 136.269299091 times faster than the speed of that electron, all we need is the relative speed of light for that portion of a superverse, which can be found using the length of GWs for the superverse electron (2.3688104e+53 meters) which we find by multiplying the speed of light by the length of c's gws which we actually determined earlier:

 

 

 

Recall earlier that the velocity of light dilates by 299792458/2.8614552e-13 over 2.5 million light years. Therefore, the speed of light is only viable over a distance of 2500000(9.461e+15)/1.0476923e+21=22.5758078016 meters in a near perfect vacuum (lambda max of the vacuum)

Length of strong GWs (where v(g)=c) = 22.5758078016 x 299792458 = 6768056912.18 meters

 

 

299792458(2.3688104e+53/6768056912.18)=1.0492694e+52 m/s. Now wait, that's not actually the speed of light in the superverse, but it is the speed of gravity waves for the superverse electron, which will be added to Super C/136.269299091 in order to find the rate at which electrons entangle other particles in the superverse. Earlier we found super tp & super lp, which can be used to find super c:

 

 

Okay, there's 6.52809e+28 meters in the radius of the CMB, using (4π/3(1e-12)^3), you can fit 1.165325e+123 electrons into the electrons of the next cosmic scale. Let's see if my math confirms that number using super lp:

2.7742023e+71/299,792,458/6.58e-15=1.4063439e+77 m/s. Planck length over planck time equals 296846011.132 m/s.

 

1.4063439e+77/296846011.132=4.737621e+68 m/s as your new planck length over planck time. 296846011.132 x 5.39e-44 equals lp, so super lp equals

 

1.4063439e+77 x 5.39e-44 = 7.5801936e+33 meters. 7.5801936e+33/4.737621e+68=1.6e-35, which is the planck length (lp).

 

lp:  7.5801936e+33 meters

 

tp:  7.5801936e+33/296846011.132  = 2.5535777e+25 seconds

 

To find super c we do (2.5535777e+25/5.39e-44)(7.5801936e+33/1.6e-35)/299792458=7.486864e+128 m/s (which can actually be used to find the size of structures in the super super verse because the length of this GW on the super verse scale equals the 6768056912.18 meters in which luminal GWs begin to propagate on our scale). 

 

Okay so the superverse electron travels at 7.486864e+128/136.269299091=5.494168e+126 m/s, on one side, depending on what direction it's going, the GWs of the forward direction entangles particles directly in front at a velocity of 1.0492694e+52 (velocity of gws for superverse electron) + 5.494168e+126 (the speed of the electron). But remember that as you chain link more particles via entanglement, there's a dilation of entangled velocities just like with the speed of light being dependent on the length of the GWs.

 

Recall earlier c(f(n)) for an electron was found to be 

 

 

 

The electron most likely has a radius of 10^-12 m, & λmax of about 4e-7 m (visible spectrum is where electrons like to hide).

f(n)=(4e-7)(4π/3(1e-12)^3)=1.6755161e-42

c(f(n))=4/(1.6755161e-42/(12π^(1/3)))=4.1957466e+43 m/s

 

4.1957466e+43, but remember we'd have to divide this velocity by the length of the electron times the speed of light to account for the contraction of time. 4.1957466e+43/(1e-12 x 299792458)=1.3995504e+47 m/s

 

The larger the distance being covered, the slower QE's velocity will be relative to the speed of light. Let's measure QE for a 16km copper wire;

 

V(sa)=299792458 + ((1.3995504e+47 x .136269299091)/(8.5e+28 x 16000))

 

V(sa)=1.4023517e+13 m/s. Which is at least 4 orders of magnitude faster than the speed of light (consistent with fiberoptic measurements of QE)

Edited April 2, 2018 by Super Polymath

[Super Polymath]

So, because these gravitational entanglement of these particles is non-instantaneous in this theory, there actually is a way to send superluminal signals out into space this way. Even set up a remote computer made of these signals, of pure information, that can receive & send ftl signals all on its own. I call it the boltzmann brain astronaut. 

 

However, for a network with that kind of complexity (basically making us Gods capable of creating intelligent life that can do our bidding on very rare exoplanets in the goldilocks zones of remote star systems) you'd have to first be capable of time travel. Miniaturization of computer technology would need to be staggeringly more advanced for such communication that it would have to rely on such communication but on much smaller scales that our calculations can handle. You'd need to run googolplexes of simulations based on this model until you get a universe that looks exactly like ours, once just happen upon such a simulation & have proven that it acts just like our universe we can assume that the location of all the particles & their trajectories will match those in the real universe - giving us omniscience of the past present & future. Then we will be able to tell exactly how moving this electron or this proton will effect entangled particles across the entire universe. 

[Super Polymath]

 But remember that as you chain link more particles via entanglement, there's a dilation of entangled velocities just like with the speed of light being dependent on the length of the GWs.

 

Recall earlier c(f(n)) for an electron was found to be 

 

 

4.1957466e+43, but remember we'd have to divide this velocity by the length of the electron times the speed of light to account for the contraction of time. 4.1957466e+43/(1e-12 x 299792458)=1.3995504e+47 m/s

 

The larger the distance being covered, the slower QE's velocity will be relative to the speed of light. Let's measure QE for a 16km copper wire;

 

V(sa)=299792458 + ((1.3995504e+47 x .136269299091)/(8.5e+28 x 16000))

 

V(sa)=1.4023517e+13 m/s. Which is at least 4 orders of magnitude faster than the speed of light (consistent with fiberoptic measurements of QE)

I had to fix that post, my QE was way off

Edited April 2, 2018 by Super Polymath

[Super Polymath]

You see if we were in a perfect wholly 3 dimensions, time would dilate to a stand-still, there would be a solid white orb that stretched out to eternity. But because the inverse brane occupies our reality in the form of black orbs aka "black holes" from smaller than a planck length to larger than 13 billion light years, we inhabit a fractal dimension, fractured, this is 2 point something dimensions that change. That's what time is. The fact that desitter space & ads erase each other means that where there's less space with less thermodynamic freedom, time ticks faster, where there's more space & more thermodynamic freedom, time ticks slower. 

Edited April 2, 2018 by Super Polymath

[Super Polymath]

When time gets erased (relativistic contraction), space gets erased & the surrounding spacetime contracts to fill in that gap in reality. That's gravity, that's all the fundamental interactions, it is the most fundamental force of nature. It explains the quantum eraser, how we can erase parts of the past & alter the present. 

Edited April 2, 2018 by Super Polymath

[Super Polymath]

So... now you seem to be behaving yourself, shall we start again?

 

I will go through this, show you your mistakes but you must agree to correct them. Up to you...

Yep

[Super Polymath]

I already know some of the mistakes.

 

For instance, I'm using approximations for time planck & length planck, which is why my lp/tp =/= c

 

But what I want from you, is to prove that my hypothesis wasn't turned into a true theory here:

 

 

 

In this theory the universe has no outer boundary limit. So eventually matter arrangements will repeat within larger & smaller structures. Black hole evaporation will be used to find a higher & lower cosmic scales using the proton’s frequency rate of one billion times per second, the size of a proton is 10⁻¹⁵ m and the Schwarzchild radius of its central black hole will give you the rate at which black evaporates.

The Schwarzchild radius is 2.484e-54 meters (just type proton into where it says earth). The rate of evaporation is 8.41e-17 seconds (just type proton into where it says earth). That’s just the vanishing rate of the proton; oscillation frequency is more for how long it would take for another proton to form plus the time it took to evaporate. Protons form at a rate of 1e-9 - 8.41e-17 = 9.9999992e-10 seconds. Now that’s enough information to use in order to finally acquire enough evidence to either confirm or deny my hypothesis.


But protons do not have λmax of a vacuum, that’s the problem, so for a proton we must use the original equation f(n)=(λmax)•((4π/3)r^3);c=c•x where f(x)=4/(n/(4π/3)^(1/3)) where 4>n to find the contraction of c with the λmax of a proton ≈ 395 nm. However, in the special case of black holes the equation must be modified. 

First of all, it’s 4πr^2 because the quasar within the Schwarzschild radius of the proton is a hollow sphere. Secondly, λmax of the proton’s quasar is the proton’s normal λmax but to the negative power of the proton’s length divided by twice the Schwarzschild radius

f(n)=(3.95e-7^-(1e-15/2(2.484e-54)))((4π)(2.484e-54)^2)=7.753772e-107

c(f(n))=4/(7.753772e-107/(4π))^(1/2) = 1.610306e+54 m/s

So a black hole with the mass of the sun (1391400000 meters) has a Schwarzschild radius of 2953 meters & will evaporate in 6.61e+74 seconds.

f(n)=(5.04e-7^-1(1.3914e+9/5906)) x ((4π x 2953)^3) = 2.3886249e+25 m/s

c(f(n))=6/(4π(2.3886249e+25^(1/2))=9.7693891e-14 m/s

1.610306e+54/299,792,458/9.7693891e-14=5.4981971e+58

5.4981971e+58/8.41e-17=6.5376898e+74 seconds ✓

 

At this point I gained mathematical confirmation of equations for black hole evaporation & for the Schwarzschild radius, did I not?? I mean, I found the same results that those equations would have given me using lambda max four over three pi radius cubed & those variables having been calculated by legitimate experiments in the scientific community, RIGHT?

Edited April 3, 2018 by Super Polymath

[Super Polymath]

Misinterpretation is going to kill your ability to understand the most important part of this thread

[Super Polymath]

Focus on the proofs, not the metaphors. 

[Super Polymath]

Or else you won't understand the meaning of that entire thesis you quoted

 

That thesis is written in my brain's own language. The math is important here, not that. 

Edited April 3, 2018 by Super Polymath

[Super Polymath]

which is it?

 

You can cross check things I told you, but I keep getting the impression you don't, because your intention doesn't appear to be about learning... but a dictorialship over your ''thesis'' as you keep generously calling it.

What you're trying to tell me doesn't necessarily disagree with what I said.

 

Start in the cosmology if you want to look at wording instead of math. There at least I'm being literal. 

[Super Polymath]

You're not pointing out mistakes.

 

For instance, you asked what I meant by the corporeal reverse of, then you state what I meant by it in saying that the time reversal of a black hole is a white hole. You're clearly fathoming something entirely different than what I meant when you're looking at my thesis. Stating that you can't make sense of it.

 

Reading the first two fully edited posts in this thread all the way through will help you fathom my thesis as I understand it. Let's look at the MATH, lambda max is the maximum amount of entropy that can occur in a given medium volume - what my thesis says is simply that the perfect three dimensions of the brane are chipped away when that maximum amount of available entropy is lower - this is time contraction. The reverse of it is time dilation. If time goes, space goes. If space goes, everything surrounding that space gets closer together because the space separating those spaces no longer exists. Ergo gravity.

 

Electromagnetism, & the strong & weak nuclear forces arise from the resulting fracture pattern in that part of the brane. 

 

If the brane gets fractured away at points located all around the observer in every which way, everything appears to be moving outward. Not so, gaps in reality are just being filled creating the illusion of expansion. 

Edited April 3, 2018 by Super Polymath

[Super Polymath]

I can just say that whatever you're saying is word salad.

 

If you want to point out mistakes, point out the mistakes in my calculations as they pertain to things like velocity, the rate in which black holes evaporate, the effects that time dilation has on that rate, etc

[Super Polymath]

You haven't proved anything in regards to the numbers I've put into testing this idea in the first two posts. You're avoiding the quotes that even ask you to address the math

[Super Polymath]

You've used a lot of words to address your concerns, no numbers, no calculations, no math. 

Edited April 3, 2018 by Super Polymath

[Super Polymath]

I dare not get into it all at once... the point of this was to see if

 

1) You could agree to the terms of me going through the work

2) Not only agree, but you were told we would do this one bit at a time

3) You have failed to address both 1) and 2)

 

 

.... which is now, I wish you all the best of luck. Do not harrass me ever again, I gave you more than one chance. I really do wish you the best.

Farewell, it's been quite comedic