Dubbelosix Posted April 3, 2018 Report Posted April 3, 2018 (edited) 1) Your theory does not contradict experimental results with (a considerably noted mathematical framework) unless for good reasons (ie. a good case of mathematics gone too far is string theory). 2) Make sure your axioms do not contradict fundamental first principles of contending fundamental interpretations of physics. 3) Make sure your equations have dimensional factuality: Many posters here have presumed equations that satisfy the wrong dimensions on both sides of the equations. 4) Make sure you use language properly in science. Any ''buzzword'' used incorrectly in a place it should not exist for instance, will be regarded as a word salad and usually takes all interest from the legit credence of a paper. Thesis... toy theory... whatever you would like to call it. 5) Try and remain logical in your interpretations within the math - the idea is not to construct an equation because it looks fancy, the point is to arrive at a fancy equation through a set of logical methodologies. 6) Be humble if you make a big statement. And always consider arguements against. Edited April 3, 2018 by Dubbelosix Quote
Super Polymath Posted April 3, 2018 Report Posted April 3, 2018 (edited) A scientific theory only has one guideline, it has to be supported by the evidence. All theories begin as hyoptheses, which have no guidelines other than basic reasoning skills because all hypotheses are scientifically equitable. Edited April 3, 2018 by Super Polymath Quote
Super Polymath Posted April 5, 2018 Report Posted April 5, 2018 (edited) they often violate first principles of different area's of physics which is a no-no!I think the particular principle you're referring to was fabricated in order to cloud a more subtle aspect of reality. That whomever may stumble upon some insightful equations, will naturally learn from applying that unclouded physics, that quantum jumps are not instantaneous, but law-breakingly fast, that any matter form can be replicated or transformed into any other matter form freely through nature's own cellular automation. It's a simple matter of plugging the right code into nature & nature will carry out whatever operation that makes fluctuations in the medium of reality a crystal, or a precious metal, or a stable repeating process that always results in a release of energy, & finally a process that can carry out computations on it's own, & even perform self assigned tasks dependent on those operational parameters. Nature is math btw Of course if too many people in the field of application find out that money really could grow on trees, some people in the upper echelon might get nervous. If said people are ethical, then some nerves will be struck. Edited April 5, 2018 by Super Polymath Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.