E-P-R Paradox

[hazelm]

This is for all the brilliant physicists who have great faith in Quantum.  Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox observed in many-particle system for the first time.

 

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/04/180426141601.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Ftop_news%2Ftop_science+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Top+Science+News%29

 

Have fun. 

 

 

Note:  I tried to change the subject to EPR (all capitals) but it would not.  Can anyone do it?

Edited April 27, 2018 by hazelm

[JMJones0424]

The title cannot be changed due to forum structure, likely because we don't want jackasses placing all caps titles.

http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/30250-how-do-i-maintain-capitalization-in-topic-titles/?do=findComment&comment=349347

 

No faith required, as observations of reality are by definition not dependent on faith.  I am not a brilliant physicist, though.

[hazelm]

The title cannot be changed due to forum structure, likely because we don't want jackasses placing all caps titles.

http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/30250-how-do-i-maintain-capitalization-in-topic-titles/?do=findComment&comment=349347

 

No faith required, as observations of reality are by definition not dependent on faith.  I am not a brilliant physicist, though.

Thank you.  I understand now.  When all caps are merited - as in this case (people's names) - would separating the letters work?  E  P  R.  Or using dashes?  E-P-R

 

By faith, I meant trust.  OK? 

[JMJones0424]

F it, let's try

[Buffy]

I changed it. 

 

FYI, yes, the forum software enforces "Title Case"

 

 

Ay, but thou canst do what I mean to ask, :phones:

Buffy

[hazelm]

F it, let's try

Hyphens worked!  Good. 

[hazelm]

I changed it. 

 

FYI, yes, the forum software enforces "Title Case"

 

 

Ay, but thou canst do what I mean to ask, :phones:

Buffy

Thanks

[Moronium]

An excerpt from the article (which JM will say cannot possibly be true):

 

Physicists from the University of Basel have observed the quantum mechanical Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox in a system of several hundred interacting atoms for the first time. The phenomenon dates back to a famous thought experiment from 1935. It allows measurement results to be predicted precisely and could be used in new types of sensors and imaging methods for electromagnetic fields. The findings were recently published in the journal Science.

 

 

The conclusions reached here may or may not be warranted, but assuming they are, that would not come as any surprise to the many critics who have rejected the copenhagen interpretation since Heisenberg and Bohr argued for it in 1927.

 

See posts 48-51 of this thread for examples of prominent physicists who have rejected it: 

 

 http://www.scienceforums.com/topic/30719-time-is-not-a-physical-entity/page-3?do=findComment&comment=356592

[JMJones0424]

Meh, my only objection is when you claim that something which is demonstrably false is true.  What time is it liar?

[Moronium]

Meh, my only objection is when you claim that something which is demonstrably false is true.  What time is it liar?

 

Well, JM, ya know, you have already said that, as a proven fact, there can be no EPR hidden variables, because the copenhagen interpretation is TRUE.

 

But, then again, you've never let self-contradiction bother you before, so why should it now, eh?

[exchemist]

Another data point in support of my theory about forum posters that use "ya" in their messages.  :)