HouseKnight1 Posted May 9, 2018 Report Posted May 9, 2018 (edited) ANTI-SEMITE MAHMOUD ABBAS AND DESTRUCTION OF ISRAEL http://aaronblog.co/2018/05/anti-semite-mahmoud-abbas-and-destruction-of-israel/ The international community expressed its disapproval of the anti-Semitic statement of Mahmoud Abbas about the Holocaust. Well, Abbas just repeated Hitler’s main accusation against Jews, that the Jewish parasites exploit the whole world, and therefore Jews must be destroyed. That is, Abbas justified the Holocaust of Jews on the same basis as Hitler. But, this accusation of parasitism, by the way, clearly cannot be attributed to Israel. Unlike the Palestinian people, the Israelis earn themselves from their own labor. Therefore, Abbas put forvard another argument specifically for Israelis, also not a new one. It turns out that the Ashkenazi Jews are descendants of the Khazars, and therefore do not have rights in Palestine. In fact, whatever is the origin (the «race») of the Ashkenazim, we bought part of the Palestinian land, paying a high price for it both in money and in lives. The Palestinians pocketed large sums of money and claimed that there was no sale or purchase. After that, four generations of Palestinians continue to live on the «subsidies» from the whole World, paid to them for being «refugees who have lost their land.» While Hitler accused us of being Semites, Palestinians accuse us for being Khazars, and left-wing anti-Semites accuse us of being «European colonizers». Anyway, Israelis are subject to destruction on the basis of race. Strictly speaking, anti-Semitic politicians, like Hitler, Corbin and Mahmoud Abbas, do not care what our origin actually is. According to anti-Semites, we do not have any rights in any case, including the right to land that we bought, and the right to live. For some reason, the international community missed this second, purely racist statement by Abbas, that the Ashkenazim Jews are descendants of the Khazars, and therefore have no rights to the land of Palestine / Israel. This last «accusation» the Palestinians have put forward for a hundred years, since the League of Nations decided to create a Jewish national «home» in Palestine. Let’s note that a hundred years ago there was no talk about the state for the Jews, rather about asylum for the Jewish minority in Palestine. While Herzl demanded to create a Jewish state anywhere immediately, for example in Uganda (as suggested the same Lord Balfour, yet in Herzl’s lifetime), those who replaced Herzl (Wolfson and Chaim Weizmann) wanted to confine the Jews of Palestine to the «national home», that is, to recognize the right of the Jewish minority to live in Arab Palestine. In general, after Herzl’s death, the Zionists put forward very modest demands, and sought the friendship of the Arabs. These efforts led to the signing of an agreement between Faisal, the leader of the Arabs, and the head of the Zionists, Weizmann. However, the Palestinians, and the rest of the Arabs, rejected the «flirt» of the Zionists. One of the reasons for «not letting Jews» into Palestine was the argument of «racial inferiority» of the Ashkenazim Jews, who are not the brothers of noble Semitic Arabs, but descendants of some low-lying Khazars. From the scientific point of view, the hypothesis of the Khazar origin of the Jews of Europe was legitimate, it was invented just by Jewish researchers at the beginning of the twentieth century. But further research on this hypothesis has not confirmed it, and I will explain in a separate article, why did. We can only talk about a small «admixture» of converted Khazars among the much more numerous European Ashkenazi Jews. The fact that the enlightened West condemned Abbas’ statement about the Holocaust and did not condemn his statements about our race has an explanation: the Holocaust statement is directed against all Jews, including against the Jews of diaspora. The statement about the «Khazars» is directed against Zionism. It turns out that anti-Zionism is a «permitted» version of anti-Semitism. Jews of the West cannot be touched, but racist statements, terror and genocide are allowed against the Jews of Israel. This approach I call selective. Of course, You may ask, where is here the genocide? Well, let’s think together, why did Abbas come with his anti-Semitic remarks just right now, these days? He is a politician, and has not make «random» statements. For whose ears are designed his anti-Semitic pearls? Right, this is a message to the Palestinians and to Iranian ayatollahs. Denying the Holocaust as a crime is the specialty of the ayatollahs. They have repeatedly stated their goal: to commit genocide of the Jews of Israel. And they are preparing a war to destroy Jews in Israel. Indeed, to whom were intended the rockets, which Israel destroyed in Syria? Iran got into Syria under the pretext of helping the Assad regime, but in fact Assad was helped by Russia, not by Iran. To suppress the opponents of Assad, supplies of large rocket are useless. IS in Syria was destroyed thanks to Russia and the West, which armed the Kurds. The ayatollahs did not make a significant contribution to the destruction of their Sunni Islamist counterparts. It is obvious that the purpose of the growing Iranian «presence» in Syria is a war against the Jewish state. Yes, ayatollahs even do not hide this, threatening a rocket attack on Israel «after May 12». So, Abbas’ remarks are an invitation to Iran to start a war against Israel. In the name of the Palestinian people, the President of Palestine justifies in advance Iranian aggression. And at the same time he calms the conscience of the Palestinian people, namely, Zionists deserve genocide: like, all Jews deserved the Holocaust in the past, so the Jews of Israel deserve the genocide at the hands of Iranian Islamists. Let’s recall, in the course of last hundred years, the Palestinians have tried to destroy the Jews with their own force or at others’ hands, nine times: 1.At the beginning of the 20th century, the Palestinian hope to destroy the Palestine Jews relied on the Turks. It is believed that only the patronage of Germany saved Jews from massacres similar to those that the Turks arranged for Armenians and Greeks. 2. Then there has occured an «independent» Palestinian attempt to massacre the Jews in the 30s of the 20th century 3. Then came the hope for the Hitler’s Holocaust of Jews in the entire Middle East, which Amin al-Husseini asked Hitler 4. Then there was an attempt of the genocide of Jews in 1948, first independently and then by the Arab hands, with the support of Great Britain 5. Then in 1967, an attempt was made to destroy Israel by Arab hands with the support of the USSR. 6. Then, the hope that another Arab war of 1973, in case of Israel’s defeat, will cause the genocide of Jews 7.Terror of Oslo and the Intifada of 2001 was clearly aimed at destroying the civilian population, its goal was genocide, but it simply failed.8 The accumulation of missiles by Hezbollah and the subsequent war of2006 was actually Iran’s attempt to destroy Israel which failed. 9. Finally, the accumulation of missiles and tunnels in Gaza, with periodic «checks» of their effectiveness, which failed, too. Total 9 attempts. Now we are approaching the tenth attempt. This time, the Palestinians hope for Iran and its allies. Mahmoud Abbas, in his statements, has already justified the upcoming tenth attempt. In fact, it was an invitation directed to the Ayatollahs, to start a war against Israel and to actually carry out the genocide of Jews, which they promised for many years. Trump will have to wait with his peace plan until the moment when this tenth attempt fails. Until the Palestinian people still have hope for the genocide of the Jews, their leaders will not agree to peace with Israel on any terms. It seems to Me, that Trump understands this truth. Edited May 9, 2018 by HouseKnight1 Quote
exchemist Posted May 9, 2018 Report Posted May 9, 2018 ANTI-SEMITE MAHMOUD ABBAS AND DESTRUCTION OF ISRAELhttp://aaronblog.co/2018/05/anti-semite-mahmoud-abbas-and-destruction-of-israel/The international community expressed its disapproval of the anti-Semitic statement of Mahmoud Abbas about the Holocaust. Well, Abbas just repeated Hitler’s main accusation against Jews, that the Jewish parasites exploit the whole world, and therefore Jews must be destroyed. That is, Abbas justified the Holocaust of Jews on the same basis as Hitler.But, this accusation of parasitism, by the way, clearly cannot be attributed to Israel. Unlike the Palestinian people, the Israelis earn themselves from their own labor. Therefore, Abbas put forvard another argument specifically for Israelis, also not a new one. It turns out that the Ashkenazi Jews are descendants of the Khazars, and therefore do not have rights in Palestine.In fact, whatever is the origin (the «race») of the Ashkenazim, we bought part of the Palestinian land, paying a high price for it both in money and in lives. The Palestinians pocketed large sums of money and claimed that there was no sale or purchase. After that, four generations of Palestinians continue to live on the «subsidies» from the whole World, paid to them for being «refugees who have lost their land.»While Hitler accused us of being Semites, Palestinians accuse us for being Khazars, and left-wing anti-Semites accuse us of being «European colonizers». Anyway, Israelis are subject to destruction on the basis of race. Strictly speaking, anti-Semitic politicians, like Hitler, Corbin and Mahmoud Abbas, do not care what our origin actually is. According to anti-Semites, we do not have any rights in any case, including the right to land that we bought, and the right to live.For some reason, the international community missed this second, purely racist statement by Abbas, that the Ashkenazim Jews are descendants of the Khazars, and therefore have no rights to the land of Palestine / Israel. This last «accusation» the Palestinians have put forward for a hundred years, since the League of Nations decided to create a Jewish national «home» in Palestine.Let’s note that a hundred years ago there was no talk about the state for the Jews, rather about asylum for the Jewish minority in Palestine. While Herzl demanded to create a Jewish state anywhere immediately, for example in Uganda (as suggested the same Lord Balfour, yet in Herzl’s lifetime), those who replaced Herzl (Wolfson and Chaim Weizmann) wanted to confine the Jews of Palestine to the «national home», that is, to recognize the right of the Jewish minority to live in Arab Palestine.In general, after Herzl’s death, the Zionists put forward very modest demands, and sought the friendship of the Arabs. These efforts led to the signing of an agreement between Faisal, the leader of the Arabs, and the head of the Zionists, Weizmann. However, the Palestinians, and the rest of the Arabs, rejected the «flirt» of the Zionists. One of the reasons for «not letting Jews» into Palestine was the argument of «racial inferiority» of the Ashkenazim Jews, who are not the brothers of noble Semitic Arabs, but descendants of some low-lying Khazars.From the scientific point of view, the hypothesis of the Khazar origin of the Jews of Europe was legitimate, it was invented just by Jewish researchers at the beginning of the twentieth century. But further research on this hypothesis has not confirmed it, and I will explain in a separate article, why did. We can only talk about a small «admixture» of converted Khazars among the much more numerous European Ashkenazi Jews.The fact that the enlightened West condemned Abbas’ statement about the Holocaust and did not condemn his statements about our race has an explanation: the Holocaust statement is directed against all Jews, including against the Jews of diaspora. The statement about the «Khazars» is directed against Zionism. It turns out that anti-Zionism is a «permitted» version of anti-Semitism. Jews of the West cannot be touched, but racist statements, terror and genocide are allowed against the Jews of Israel. This approach I call selective.Of course, You may ask, where is here the genocide? Well, let’s think together, why did Abbas come with his anti-Semitic remarks just right now, these days? He is a politician, and has not make «random» statements. For whose ears are designed his anti-Semitic pearls? Right, this is a message to the Palestinians and to Iranian ayatollahs.Denying the Holocaust as a crime is the specialty of the ayatollahs. They have repeatedly stated their goal: to commit genocide of the Jews of Israel. And they are preparing a war to destroy Jews in Israel.Indeed, to whom were intended the rockets, which Israel destroyed in Syria? Iran got into Syria under the pretext of helping the Assad regime, but in fact Assad was helped by Russia, not by Iran. To suppress the opponents of Assad, supplies of large rocket are useless. IS in Syria was destroyed thanks to Russia and the West, which armed the Kurds. The ayatollahs did not make a significant contribution to the destruction of their Sunni Islamist counterparts.It is obvious that the purpose of the growing Iranian «presence» in Syria is a war against the Jewish state. Yes, ayatollahs even do not hide this, threatening a rocket attack on Israel «after May 12».So, Abbas’ remarks are an invitation to Iran to start a war against Israel. In the name of the Palestinian people, the President of Palestine justifies in advance Iranian aggression. And at the same time he calms the conscience of the Palestinian people, namely, Zionists deserve genocide: like, all Jews deserved the Holocaust in the past, so the Jews of Israel deserve the genocide at the hands of Iranian Islamists.Let’s recall, in the course of last hundred years, the Palestinians have tried to destroy the Jews with their own force or at others’ hands, nine times:1.At the beginning of the 20th century, the Palestinian hope to destroy the Palestine Jews relied on the Turks. It is believed that only the patronage of Germany saved Jews from massacres similar to those that the Turks arranged for Armenians and Greeks. 2. Then there has occured an «independent» Palestinian attempt to massacre the Jews in the 30s of the 20th century 3. Then came the hope for the Hitler’s Holocaust of Jews in the entire Middle East, which Amin al-Husseini asked Hitler 4. Then there was an attempt of the genocide of Jews in 1948, first independently and then by the Arab hands, with the support of Great Britain 5. Then in 1967, an attempt was made to destroy Israel by Arab hands with the support of the USSR. 6. Then, the hope that another Arab war of 1973, in case of Israel’s defeat, will cause the genocide of Jews 7.Terror of Oslo and the Intifada of 2001 was clearly aimed at destroying the civilian population, its goal was genocide, but it simply failed.8 The accumulation of missiles by Hezbollah and the subsequent war of2006 was actually Iran’s attempt to destroy Israel which failed. 9. Finally, the accumulation of missiles and tunnels in Gaza, with periodic «checks» of their effectiveness, which failed, too. Total 9 attempts.Now we are approaching the tenth attempt. This time, the Palestinians hope for Iran and its allies. Mahmoud Abbas, in his statements, has already justified the upcoming tenth attempt. In fact, it was an invitation directed to the Ayatollahs, to start a war against Israel and to actually carry out the genocide of Jews, which they promised for many years.Trump will have to wait with his peace plan until the moment when this tenth attempt fails. Until the Palestinian people still have hope for the genocide of the Jews, its leaders will not agree to peace with Israel on any terms. It seems to Me, that Trump understands this truth. ZZZZZzzzzzzz........... Deepwater6 1 Quote
JMJones0424 Posted May 10, 2018 Report Posted May 10, 2018 It's easy to say zzz when you are not living in the middle of the conflict. I don't particularly agree with a lot of the OP's statements, but zzz is a pretty infuriating response. Quote
HouseKnight1 Posted May 10, 2018 Author Report Posted May 10, 2018 The conclusions I made few days ago, come true just right now. Israel is in hurry to destroy in advance Iranian means of destruction, before the amount of accumulated means may decide the outcome of the conflict. Quote
OceanBreeze Posted May 10, 2018 Report Posted May 10, 2018 Things are definitely heating up again: Some 20 rockets were fired at northern Israeli military bases by Iranian forces from southern Syria just after midnight, Israel said, prompting extensive retaliatory raids. The Israel Defense Forces said that it suffered no casualties, either on the ground or in the air, and that no rockets fired from Syria made impact in Israeli territory. Russia’s defense ministry said Israel’s strikes on Syria saw 28 planes take part in raids with a total of around 70 missiles fired. “28 Israeli F-15 and F-16 aircraft were used in the attack, which released around 60 air-to-ground missiles over various parts of Syria. Israel also fired more than 10 tactical ground-to-ground missiles,” the ministry said in a statement quoted by the Interfax news agency. How much of this do you think is due to Trump throwing out Obama's deal with Iran? Quote
Maine farmer Posted May 10, 2018 Report Posted May 10, 2018 Things are definitely heating up again: How much of this do you think is due to Trump throwing out Obama's deal with Iran?I think none. There is a long history of the Middle East being in conflict, and I doubt any U.S. president will make much of a difference. Quote
sanctus Posted May 11, 2018 Report Posted May 11, 2018 JMJones, look for the other posts from Houseknight, always same type and almost never replying to comments (or only the one he likes to answer too) and the answer almost always boils down to anyone criticizing Israel being an anti-semite...that is the reason for the ZZZZZzzzz...I kinda stopped trying to reason with him, because it seems pointless...Farming Guy, give Trump credit where it is due :-) Did the recognition of Jerusalem decrease the tension or increase it? Same for Iran deal? exchemist and JMJones0424 2 Quote
exchemist Posted May 11, 2018 Report Posted May 11, 2018 I think none. There is a long history of the Middle East being in conflict, and I doubt any U.S. president will make much of a difference.If this Iran deal goes down, Iran will be driven closer to China and Russia. Russia already is a sort of ally of Iran in the Syria bloodbath. And China's Belt and Road initiative would welcome an upgrade to the Karakoram Highway to trade through to Iran. Iran is a reasonably sized and reasonably industrialised and educated country and strategically located, so worth having as a partner. It seems to me Trump is playing double or quits: either the sanctions hurt enough to force Iran back to the negotiating table for a worse deal (from their viewpoint), or they buddy up with China and Russia and get those centrifuges spinning 24/7. A crucial factor is Iranian internal politics. There is a huge contest under way between reformers like Rouhani and the hardliners among the mullahs and the Revolutionary Guard. The latter are already cheering the collapse of this deal. It certainly weakens Rouhani, as he was banking on it delivering an improved standard of living for Iranians, in order to further his reforms. Is that what Trump and that f*ckwit Bolton want? What is for sure is the one thing that will stop a Middle East country being invaded by the USA is possession of a nuclear bomb. So I am not a bit surprised they want one, especially seeing as they are practically surrounded by nuclear states already. JMJones0424 1 Quote
exchemist Posted May 11, 2018 Report Posted May 11, 2018 It's easy to say zzz when you are not living in the middle of the conflict. I don't particularly agree with a lot of the OP's statements, but zzz is a pretty infuriating response.As Sanctus has explained, this guy is like a cracked record. But on the issue, I have limited sympathy. Israel has done very little in recent years to look for peace and under Netanyahu has seemed intent on winding up the tension even more than before. I get sick of Israel playing the anti-semitism card when it behaves the way it does towards the Palestinians. JMJones0424 and A-wal 2 Quote
JMJones0424 Posted May 12, 2018 Report Posted May 12, 2018 I agree, and I misunderstood your reply, I'm sorry. Quote
exchemist Posted May 12, 2018 Report Posted May 12, 2018 (edited) I agree, and I misunderstood your reply, I'm sorry.No sweat. Not knowing the background regarding this tiresome poster, you might easily have thought I was just being flippant about a serious issue. Edited May 12, 2018 by exchemist Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.