My Theory Of Everything. (Still Mathematically Incomplete)

[marcospolo]

I don't have issues with big bang per se, I think it's missing some details. It seems very likely an event called big bang happened, we just have to understand why. 

I don't see any reason to think that the BigBang must have occurred, it leads to lots of conflicting conclusions, and makes no sense whatsoever, so its more likely that it was just a wild guess by some stoned Uni student who was trying to get laid after a party.  it did not work.

So there is no merit in wasting time trying to figure out why it happened is there?  

[Dubbelosix]

It doesn't have to be correct, it stands as the model which most accurately describes a number of phenomenon, with its greatest and most surprising success of being able to predict the various elements, known as nucleosynthesis. So there are in fact very good reasons to think this happened at some distant past of the universe. 

[marcospolo]

It doesn't have to be correct, it stands as the model which most accurately describes a number of phenomenon, with its greatest and most surprising success of being able to predict the various elements, known as nucleosynthesis. So there are in fact very good reasons to think this happened at some distant past of the universe. 

Yes, it makes perfect sense, we have tungsten and gold and marshmallows now because hydrogen and helium got together and magically achemically morphed into these other substances.  makes perfect sense.  and Jesus turned water into wine too! 

No, bighbang does not offer any mechanism to explain anything, it just says stuff and people believe it.

Edited October 15, 2018 by marcospolo

[Super Polymath]

if or

Existentialism is the absence of absence. Obviously it didn't begin anywherewhen in particular. 

 

And no there was no Dur Bhig Bnagnk!

[Dubbelosix]

Yes i suppose it would appear like ''magic'' to an ignoramus. 

[marcospolo]

Yes i suppose it would appear like ''magic'' to an ignoramus. 

Nothing more magical than the claim that everything was once nothing which decided to just magically pop into existence. Seem strangely similar to "god did it, created everything from nothing"

and please don't use derogatory terms for others on this forum, it only serve to negate anything you have to say, and makes you look like the fool.

[Dubbelosix]

Don't back peddle, you called nucleosythnesis as magic, not the issue of where the universe came from. You lack a lot of knowledge with big claims with no support. 

[Dubbelosix]

Derogatory comments? You obviously don't know me yet, I end up calling spades a spade. 

[Super Polymath]

Nothing more magical than the claim that everything was once nothing which decided to just magically pop into existence. Seem strangely similar to "god did it, created everything from nothing"

and please don't use derogatory terms for others on this forum, it only serve to negate anything you have to say, and makes you look like the fool.

Okay but your side is moot without math skills in which 006 is becoming increasingly efficient he learns almost as fast a me and my mind races past the likes of William Sidis and Daniel Tammet's mixed matched synesthetic calculations but I can drive like Jason Bourne.

 

Watch The Accountant and the New Predator.

[marcospolo]

Okay but your side is moot without math skills in which 006 is becoming increasingly efficient he learns almost as fast a me and my mind races past the likes of William Sidis and Daniel Tammet's mixed matched synesthetic calculations but I can drive like Jason Bourne.

 

Watch The Accountant and the New Predator.

well, I am not interested in looking at your math as if it could actually explain anything. Im considering only the concepts behind SR, which requires no math to consider.

and Dubbelosix is not worth replying to, he has revealed that with his comments.

[Super Polymath]

I am not interested in looking at your math as if it could actually explain anything.

Oh ho ho. Well aren't you the close-minded layman.

[marcospolo]

Oh ho ho. Well aren't you the close-minded layman.

You can talk, I suppose you have not watched my videos yet........

there's an opportunity to prove them wrong with your cure all math.

Edited October 16, 2018 by marcospolo

[Super Polymath]

[marcospolo]

I don't follow your math here....... maybe you got the link wrong, theres only a video the likes of which only an idiot would appreciate. You must have made a typo.

[Super Polymath]

I don't follow your math here....... maybe you got the link wrong, theres only a video the likes of which only an idiot would appreciate. You must have made a typo.

Never give all your secrets away I've expos-a'd plenty 'round here Mr. "Interests What lies behind the lies of modern Physics."

[marcospolo]

Well, that now 2 users that I don't need to reply to anymore, both have nothing useful to say. "Dubbelosix" and "Super Polymath".

[Super Polymath]

Well, that now 2 users that I don't need to reply to anymore, both have nothing useful to say. "Dubbelosix" and "Super Polymath".

You seem frustrated that both of us refuse to give you either of our existential insights freely