rockytriton Posted August 8, 2005 Report Posted August 8, 2005 Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class? C1ay and Dark Mind 2
Tormod Posted August 8, 2005 Report Posted August 8, 2005 No. It belongs in "varieties of religious thought" or varieties thereof.
Tormod Posted August 8, 2005 Report Posted August 8, 2005 BTW...why does the poll have two "no" options...? :)
C1ay Posted August 8, 2005 Report Posted August 8, 2005 BTW...why does the poll have two "no" options...? :)As opposed to say three or four of them? Will the software let you enter only one option? That would have been plenty in this case.
rockytriton Posted August 8, 2005 Author Report Posted August 8, 2005 It wouldn't let me put just 1 option :)
Dark Mind Posted August 8, 2005 Report Posted August 8, 2005 Well, this is at best a good test of the human psyche :rant:. I chose the second "no", putting the score at two (for the first one) and three (for the second one) :). Let's see which "no" gets more votes :eek:.
Buckyball Posted August 9, 2005 Report Posted August 9, 2005 Indeed It is watered down creationism.I voted for the first no tieing it at 3.
Tormod Posted August 9, 2005 Report Posted August 9, 2005 This really should be a multiple choice poll. How am I supposed to know which "no" is the correct one?
rockytriton Posted August 9, 2005 Author Report Posted August 9, 2005 maybe I should have made it "no" and "absolutely not".
Fishteacher73 Posted August 9, 2005 Report Posted August 9, 2005 The appropriate "no" will eventually come to show the intricate design of the creator and prove its point... But we will argue which is the correct "no" untill then. Perhaps a closer look at the specific code used in this post might lead us to a more refine aproximation as to the correct "no". (Perhaps we could just ask for devine inspiration also...)
C1ay Posted August 9, 2005 Report Posted August 9, 2005 maybe I should have made it "no" and "absolutely not".or "absolutely not" and "positively not"....
Dark Mind Posted August 9, 2005 Report Posted August 9, 2005 or "absolutely not" and "positively not"....I like that better ;).
Buffy Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 I voted "no" although a moment later I thought I should have voted "no". Its so hard to decide, I think it could be no or no, but I'm not sure. Decidedly Undecided,Buffy
pgrmdave Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 Right now, the poll is tied, 5-5 It will be interesting to see whether or not people are more apt to choose the first, or the second. However, no - intelligent design is not scientific, and thus should not be taught in school, unless to point out the massive flaws.
Dark Mind Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 I voted "no" although a moment later I thought I should have voted "no". Its so hard to decide, I think it could be no or no, but I'm not sure. Decidedly Undecided,BuffyCorrection... Decidedly null,Buffy ;)
Fishteacher73 Posted August 10, 2005 Report Posted August 10, 2005 Being that I like to waste as little movement as possible, I hit the first no I saw...
Lolic Posted September 17, 2005 Report Posted September 17, 2005 Should Intelligent Design be taught in science class?Since design detection is already taught in archeology, forensic science, cryptology, and copywright infringment, are't we already 4/5 of the way there? There's hope that biology will catch up in a decade or two.
Recommended Posts