Cmb And The Construction Of Galaxies Using Unruh Effect And Hawking Raditation

[devin553344]

OK I changed my idea from mechanical advantage to more of a Schrodinger equation idea, where the energy produced from the electric quantization Hawking radiation, produces a variation of the containment of the energies, therefore transforming the electric energy of the proton into the matter energy of the proton, and the matter energy of the electron into the electric energy of the electron. Which is a much better interpretation. I updated the file in the OP. Also there was a typo I fixed in the electric quantization area of the black body radiation.

Edited February 2, 2019 by devin553344

[devin553344]

This link might be of interest to you,  http://cds.cern.ch/r...les/9703137.pdf Inflation and thermodynamics leading to particle creation. 

 

Yeah that went right over my head. I'll be studying that for a while. Thanks :)

[devin553344]

I added a section to the OP pdf file at the end regarding information theory and balancing out forces. They're fairly interesting equations.

[devin553344]

I fixed the information theory area of the theory. It's updated in the OP pdf :)

[exchemist]

Your theory is getting longer again.   Have you considered the theory might be wrong, and where it might be wrong   To give you a little clue starting at the first paragraph you write :- 

 

" I believe that there is no energy to a vacuum. One can prove this concept by creating a vacuum in an experiment and measuring the change in energy of the vacuum. The pressure from objects in a vacuum does represent energy, but when void of objects the vacuum represents nothing, null or void. So where does the dark energy or vacuum energy come from? I will attempt to establish that the dark energy relates to the CMB. The dark energy should represent a negative matter curvature, similar to opposing charges of electric would produce (like that which diminishes matter curvatures in binding energy).

"

 

Have you heard of the Casimir effect, it might give you something to read about and understand what causes it.

Dark energy is not related to the CMB. The expansion of the universe is accelerating due to dark energy, the CMB is cooling as entropy increases.

 

Are you out of your depth    

Its seems to me that the much vaunted Casimir Effect may a lot of fuss about nothing. It appears to be well predicted by relativistically corrected van der Waals forces between the plates, i.e. nothing to do with vacuum fluctuations at all!  

 

More here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect

[devin553344]

Your theory is getting longer again.   Have you considered the theory might be wrong, and where it might be wrong   To give you a little clue starting at the first paragraph you write :- 

 

" I believe that there is no energy to a vacuum. One can prove this concept by creating a vacuum in an experiment and measuring the change in energy of the vacuum. The pressure from objects in a vacuum does represent energy, but when void of objects the vacuum represents nothing, null or void. So where does the dark energy or vacuum energy come from? I will attempt to establish that the dark energy relates to the CMB. The dark energy should represent a negative matter curvature, similar to opposing charges of electric would produce (like that which diminishes matter curvatures in binding energy).

"

 

Have you heard of the Casimir effect, it might give you something to read about and understand what causes it.

Dark energy is not related to the CMB. The expansion of the universe is accelerating due to dark energy, the CMB is cooling as entropy increases.

 

Are you out of your depth    

 

Are you out of your depth? No: if I'm not mistaken, a vacuum is measured in pascals or Joules per meter cubed. As you approach a more perfect vacuum the energy diminishes to zero energy. The concept of vacuum fluctuations and zero point energy might be inline with my theory, where virtual particles are created by the vacuum energy itself. And if you understand that then you've understood my theory: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy

 

The zero point article points out: "In a letter to Paul Ehrenfest of the same year Einstein declared zero-point energy “dead as a doornail”^[33] Zero-point energy was also invoked by Peter Debye,^[34] who noted that zero-point energy of the atoms of a crystal lattice would cause a reduction in the intensity of the diffracted radiation in X-ray diffraction even as the temperature approached absolute zero. In 1916 Walther Nernst proposed that empty space was filled with zero-point electromagnetic radiation.^[35] With the development of general relativity Einstein found the energy density of the vacuum to contribute towards a cosmological constant in order to obtain static solutions to his field equations; the idea that empty space, or the vacuum, could have some intrinsic energy associated to it had returned, with Einstein stating in 1920:

 

There is a weighty argument to be adduced in favour of the aether hypothesis. To deny the aether is ultimately to assume that empty space has no physical qualities whatever. The fundamental facts of mechanics do not harmonize with this view... according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an aether. According to the general theory of relativity space without aether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense. But this aether may not be thought of as endowed with the quality characteristic of ponderable media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it.^[36][37]"

 

Another problem is that I'm not sure zero point energy is a theory that can be proven. In order to prove it, I would think you would have to measure it in a perfect vacuum, which never exists nor can be created. Unless you embrace my theory and describe zero-point energy as Einstein did and say it is a cosmological constant idea.

 

Still playing around with values and calculating possibilities. I like my quantum gravitation idea, and I'm proposing, now in the theory, that the CMB is a vaporization (photon gas) of the vacuum energy. In other words there is no such thing as a big bang. My values calculate from known constants. Which stands for itself in proving the ideas. I'm still playing around in the theory. I think there is some basis for believing it. Although some minor areas are far fetched (the mechanical advantage radius for instance). Other areas, are sound minded I think.

 

Granted the quantum gravitational idea I just added is really complex in the understanding of the concept. It's a modification of information theory. But you will find that it calculates precisely.

 

Cheers :)

Edited February 12, 2019 by devin553344

[devin553344]

I added a portion of information theory and calculate the proton and electron frequencies and therefore their mass energies. I updated the OP pdf file.

[devin553344]

I believe I have solved gravitation and the gravitational constant. The gravitational constant arises from it's dependence on the wave curvature of the protons and neutrons and escapes exponentially as a time dilation near the event horizon of the particles wave nature. I've provided the calculation to derive the gravitational constant from the wave curvature of protons. It's in the OP pdf file. Cheers :)

Edited February 21, 2019 by devin553344

[devin553344]

I came up with a dimensional system that appears to relate between forces and basic particle types. The concept may be used to unify the forces and explain quarks in protons and neutrons. I added it to the OP post in the pdf file.

[devin553344]

I successfully related the Planck constant to a 1 dimensional elementary interaction per peak-to-peak wave undulation. Added it to the theory in the OP. Also related gravitation to the strong force.

[Vmedvil2]

I have to say I have been reading your paper and I find it interesting that you think that there are plank level singularities in time-space, what do you calculate the energy of empty space to be as a repulsive or attractive force and what is the magnitude of it in newtons or joules. This was one of my earlier ideas behind a model I had made back when I was a undergraduate with Planck level singularities, How do the singularities form time-space have you worked out the geometry of time-space in this theory with planck level singularities in it.

Edited March 15, 2019 by VictorMedvil

[devin553344]

I have to say I have been reading your paper and I find it interesting that you think that there are plank level singularities in time-space, what do you calculate the energy of empty space to be as a repulsive or attractive force and what is the magnitude of it in newtons or joules. This was one of my earlier ideas behind a model I had made back when I was a undergraduate with Planck level singularities, How do the singularities form time-space have you worked out the geometry of time-space in this theory with planck level singularities in it.

 

Thanks, I should probably state that I just found a Bekenstein bound that relates Planck's constant directly to the elementary charge. I updated it in the OP pdf. You might find it interesting if you haven't already seen it.

 

I don't call them singularities. For the first part of the equation they have either an Unruh temperature or a black hole entropy characteristic (using Planck length squared) depending on which makes more sense. Probably black hole entropy makes more sense seeing that Einstein used a black hole to describe the vacuum energy. In other words, at some point any continuous mass occupying space will form a black hole, one only needs to find the volume and radius.

 

Basically the way I see it, every point in space could form an electron, if it had sufficient energy. I think of the first equations in the theory as particle stabilization mechanics. In other words, what stabilizes protons and electrons. I think that the dark energy is responsible for this because I found them appearing in the calculations. Also the elementary charge would exist throughout all of space, or 3/5Ke^2. I've provided the Bekenstein bound to further prove that idea, relating 3/5Ke^2 to hc (Planck's constant), it's near the end of the theory.

 

I'm a self made inventor, not a physicist, I'm probably only mild in my understanding of physics. My past has been running a company Wintsch Labs, that manufactured and sold thermo-electric coolers for CPU's and GPU's.

 

I haven't really worked out any singularity ideas. That would be interesting I think :)

 

P.S. I modified the gravitational idea to act just as the strong force with a lens reduction of curvature image. I thought it was a better idea than mine. But it may describe some of what you're asking. Such that a particle that is a point-like entity of the vacuum black hole, has a c limit of it's rvac distance which restricts the wave curvature for gravitation.

Edited March 15, 2019 by devin553344

[fahrquad]

Victor and a few others might find this Dr. Who episode I just watched interesting, "World Enough and Time" (season 10, episode 11).  A 400 mile long space craft is trapped in the gravity well of a black hole and time travels faster at the end closer to the black hole due to the effect of gravity on time.  I am sure someone has an equation for that.  Anyhow, here is the link.  Missy and the Master are in this one, and oh, Bill Potts is turned into a Cyberman.

 

https://watchdoctorwhoonline.com/episodes/doctor-who-10x11/ 

Edited March 17, 2019 by fahrquad

[Vmedvil2]

Thanks, I should probably state that I just found a Bekenstein bound that relates Planck's constant directly to the elementary charge. I updated it in the OP pdf. You might find it interesting if you haven't already seen it.

 

I don't call them singularities. For the first part of the equation they have either an Unruh temperature or a black hole entropy characteristic (using Planck length squared) depending on which makes more sense. Probably black hole entropy makes more sense seeing that Einstein used a black hole to describe the vacuum energy. In other words, at some point any continuous mass occupying space will form a black hole, one only needs to find the volume and radius.

 

Basically the way I see it, every point in space could form an electron, if it had sufficient energy. I think of the first equations in the theory as particle stabilization mechanics. In other words, what stabilizes protons and electrons. I think that the dark energy is responsible for this because I found them appearing in the calculations. Also the elementary charge would exist throughout all of space, or 3/5Ke^2. I've provided the Bekenstein bound to further prove that idea, relating 3/5Ke^2 to hc (Planck's constant), it's near the end of the theory.

 

I'm a self made inventor, not a physicist, I'm probably only mild in my understanding of physics. My past has been running a company Wintsch Labs, that manufactured and sold thermo-electric coolers for CPU's and GPU's.

 

I haven't really worked out any singularity ideas. That would be interesting I think :)

 

P.S. I modified the gravitational idea to act just as the strong force with a lens reduction of curvature image. I thought it was a better idea than mine. But it may describe some of what you're asking. Such that a particle that is a point-like entity of the vacuum black hole, has a c limit of it's rvac distance which restricts the wave curvature for gravitation.

 

The idea behind the thing I did as a freshman was that Photons were charge singularities like the gravitational sort that had a neutral charge and the graviton was a Blackhole being the force carrier of gravitation just being a very large particle but this reminded me of this, but it is possible that what you say is true as Dark Energy or the Cosmological Constant is 1/L_p²  or ruffly equivalent to it. It could be that the universe is a manifestation of an instructive curvature that even charged particles could generate Singularities via their charge Energy-Stress. A speculation for your theory is Dark Energy generate a negative curvature like Unruh radiation or is it static not causing curvature being that the universe is a inertial body not subject to it, is Dark Energy the Unruh Radiation of the Universe Black Hole? If the universe spins like Black Holes then possibly Dark Energy interacts with the spin of the universe making it subject to this Dark Energy or Universe Unruh Radiation causing it to expand. Like when you spin a liquid in a cup the spin causes the liquid to be attracted to the sides. In any case, I subscribe to the idea that Dark Energy is a Tachyonic Particle always traveling faster than like thus causing pressure on time-space to expand as of always after my work with the Wormhole Metric and Quantum Entanglement bridges in the String Field as you may actually see Tachyonic Dark Energy particles as photons in Entanglement bridge space.

Edited March 17, 2019 by VictorMedvil

[devin553344]

The idea behind the thing I did as a freshman was that Photons were charge singularities like the gravitational sort that had a neutral charge and the graviton was a Blackhole being the force carrier of gravitation just being a very large particle but this reminded me of this, but it is possible that what you say is true as Dark Energy or the Cosmological Constant is 1/L_p²  or ruffly equivalent to it. It could be that the universe is a manifestation of an instructive curvature that even charged particles could generate Singularities via their charge Energy-Stress. A speculation for your theory is Dark Energy generate a negative curvature like Unruh radiation or is it static not causing curvature being that the universe is a inertial body not subject to it, is Dark Energy the Unruh Radiation of the Universe Black Hole? If the universe spins like Black Holes then possibly Dark Energy interacts with the spin of the universe making it subject to this Dark Energy or Universe Unruh Radiation causing it to expand. Like when you spin a liquid in a cup the spin causes the liquid to be attracted to the sides. In any case, I subscribe to the idea that Dark Energy is a Tachyonic Particle always traveling faster than like thus causing pressure on time-space to expand as of always after my work with the Wormhole Metric and Quantum Entanglement bridges in the String Field as you may actually see Tachyonic Dark Energy particles as photons in Entanglement bridge space.

 

I modeled space as a black hole where it does not exceed the event horizon value in any position. So there are no singularities. It has a continuous energy density. I haven't covered the expanse of the universe yet.

 

Also I tried to unify the strong force of protons/neutrons, the electron binding energy, and gravitation. I put it in the OP's pdf.