Vmedvil2 Posted January 22, 2019 Report Posted January 22, 2019 (edited) Basically, if we have the ability to generate a Quantum or Mini Black Hole and also when Black hole's spin it generates a Magnetic Field then why is mass not fed into the Black Hole to make it larger you could make a Mass to Energy reactor called a Singularity Inductor that could put out Giga to Tera watts of energy by feeding mass in then converting the mass into spin and gravitational pull, all that would be required is a reactor in a Torus to contain the Black Hole using Superconductors such as YBCO or Iron Based Superductors to keep it contained then feed mass into the device to produce energy in the form of gravitational energy or Energy from the Relativistic jet formed by the spin of the BH, all that is required is , Energy Loss in Output = Mass Gain in Energy (EGain = MGainC2). The LHC or a Future LHC could be easily made into a Black Hole reactor "Singularity Inductor" to produce energy after a BH is made. https://phys.org/news/2015-03-mini-black-holes-lhc-parallel.html It could be like the device in this video from one of my favorite Sci Fi Civilization games. Edited January 22, 2019 by VictorMedvil Quote
GAHD Posted January 22, 2019 Report Posted January 22, 2019 Because reality doesn't work like video games, and to keep an artificial singularity stable would require greater energy concentrations than we are capable of maintaining. :) Quote
Vmedvil2 Posted January 22, 2019 Author Report Posted January 22, 2019 (edited) Because reality doesn't work like video games, and to keep an artificial singularity stable would require greater energy concentrations than we are capable of maintaining. :) I believe that to be true however in the future maybe. Edited January 22, 2019 by VictorMedvil Quote
Vmedvil2 Posted January 27, 2019 Author Report Posted January 27, 2019 (edited) The Spin of the Blackhole generates a Electromagnetic field which can be used to contain the Mini Black Hole. EM field of Spin BH Radius Edited January 27, 2019 by VictorMedvil Quote
Orion Posted January 31, 2019 Report Posted January 31, 2019 Based on another theory, and whats worseFor the nonrotating black hole examined in Chapters 2 through 5, the Schwarzschild i'm afraid the blackhole you mentioned doesn't spin. superpolymath8 1 Quote
Vmedvil2 Posted February 1, 2019 Author Report Posted February 1, 2019 (edited) Based on another theory, and whats worseFor the nonrotating black hole examined in Chapters 2 through 5, the Schwarzschild i'm afraid the blackhole you mentioned doesn't spin. You can induce spin to a Schwarzchild BH as long as it is small enough turning it into a Kerr-like BH, but your right in its natural state the Mini BH's would not spin that is correct being a Schwarzchild type BH, but even not spinning that Schwarzchild BH's may have a magnetic field. The Same is true with a Blackhole as a motor kinda, The movement of the BH causes a internal current and thus a Magnetic field even in a schwarzchild BH, which is like I(Current) in the motor's center which will induce the BH/Motor to spin transforming it into a Kerr type BH in theory. Edited February 1, 2019 by VictorMedvil Quote
Orion Posted February 2, 2019 Report Posted February 2, 2019 so ur gonna generate a mini black hole that doesn't spin then induce it too create a torque through its EMF/C that doesn't exist??by using the layout of a DC motor? Too bad it wont ever return in reverse like that diagram shows. Quote
Vmedvil2 Posted February 2, 2019 Author Report Posted February 2, 2019 so ur gonna generate a mini black hole that doesn't spin then induce it too create a torque through its EMF/C that doesn't exist??by using the layout of a DC motor? Too bad it wont ever return in reverse like that diagram shows. That was the plan. Quote
Orion Posted February 2, 2019 Report Posted February 2, 2019 (edited) okay now let me tell you how stupid you sound. You're gonna be right next to an artificial black hole (that somehow doesn't suck you in) then induce it to spin just willy nilly. Think Twice before you speak. Edited February 2, 2019 by Orion Quote
Vmedvil2 Posted February 2, 2019 Author Report Posted February 2, 2019 (edited) okay now let me tell you how stupid you sound. You're gonna be right next to an artificial black hole (that somehow doesn't suck you in) then induce it to spin just willy nilly. Think Twice before you speak. haha =) Edited February 2, 2019 by VictorMedvil Quote
Orion Posted February 2, 2019 Report Posted February 2, 2019 To me it's not funny.All you've done is waste time Bullshitting theorys for your murky sense of pride.You sure you're a doctor/biophysicist? Quote
Orion Posted February 2, 2019 Report Posted February 2, 2019 All black holes have spin. What he is talking about are a series cylindrical rings that absorb the magnetic field of the collection of Planck particles that are paired via electromagnetism to the spin of the femtoscale bh, that bh evaporates almost instantly as a series of quantum lasers drag several down quarks into closer and closer proximity until a new femto scale black hole with a new spin replaces the former one and breaks that spin of the cylindrical rings generating an electromagnetic pulse to power the quantum lasers via sonoluminessence. It's a heart beat not a motor There are two types of black holes: The Schwarzschild black hole is the simplest black hole, in which the core does not rotate. This type of black hole only has a singularity and an event horizon Please educate yourself. Quote
Orion Posted February 2, 2019 Report Posted February 2, 2019 Theoretically, objectively there's only one type of black holeI'll call these bullshit bluffs all dayHeres two more examples Stellar Black Holes: This type of black holes originates from the death of a massive star. Supermassive Black Holes: These types are the biggest among the three. Quote
Orion Posted February 2, 2019 Report Posted February 2, 2019 (edited) No Alchemic reactions create different types of black holes One Rotates because of the Stars Orbit. From trajectory from the outter ring to the center can be measured. if you thought it couldn't be then you forgot we sacrificed a satellite just to find out. from Blackholes into a different subject entirely? okay child get schooled. Now the Jewish people believe in this symbol https://www.bing.com...ex=8&ajaxhist=0 it's the alchemic symbol for wind. It forms your star of david giving the illusion of Wind free in all directions. This is taken from the Great pyramid of Giza. It's why the sphinx got it's nose shot off by a European, it was a Wind Temple not just a simple pyramid. They were painted white and with the color of lime stone they created beams in the sky. They created the pyramids simply with basic masonry They "Grinded up the Limestone" (idk about you but breaking rocks with a big object sounds fun these days) Carried sacks and made perfect blocks. with a recipe like cement. Americans use Jesus which is a latin accent for ZeuS we're sneaky, or he's sneaky. The truth is, if you're looking for god it's a collaboration of many things. Though I do believe the Wind idea being the most plausible due to what solar winds could do. Through improvement the origin has become blurry, and a murky picture at that. Religion is faith in something other than yourself everything on-top of that is just sugar coated. I'm starting to see Islamic people found in sarcophagus. They believed in the idea of "Wrapping Existence." This Man https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djoser He is the most advanced in communication through hiero, atleast too me. even one not knowing how to read or write it can understand what he wanted. https://en.wikipedia...9_Djoser_03.jpg (try) What I do believe is cause and effect We all started from the East (We Came Here) I Believe people chose a path they felt correct. Even our language English is based on Latin and European. through the course of religion, or through the course of many? "They all just believe in (This)" Edited February 2, 2019 by Orion Quote
GAHD Posted February 2, 2019 Report Posted February 2, 2019 Not going to bother to math it out, but Shouldn't an AF BH like that have color-superconductivity? I'd think that would totally screw over any flemming or maxwell ideas on charge-flow. Could be wrong but...ya know, feilds (by math at least) are photonic constructs so you're not going to get any EMF feilds outside AFAIK. Maybe some reactive anti-fields forming in relation to exterior forces like you see in superconductors though. Quote
Vmedvil2 Posted February 2, 2019 Author Report Posted February 2, 2019 (edited) Not going to bother to math it out, but Shouldn't an AF BH like that have color-superconductivity? I'd think that would totally screw over any flemming or maxwell ideas on charge-flow. Could be wrong but...ya know, feilds (by math at least) are photonic constructs so you're not going to get any EMF feilds outside AFAIK. Maybe some reactive anti-fields forming in relation to exterior forces like you see in superconductors though. Well, I know that Kerr-Newman metric states the Spinning BH have magnetic fields and are charged which was what I was basing this idea on which is a solution to General Relativity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerr%E2%80%93Newman_metric Edited February 2, 2019 by VictorMedvil Quote
Vmedvil2 Posted March 1, 2019 Author Report Posted March 1, 2019 This thread is plagued by relativity cranks oh joy..... Orion Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.