Many Worlds Theory

[SaxonViolence]

Friends,

 

Are there any variations of the so-called "Many Worlds Theory" that posits MANY alternate Universes, but doesn't posit an infinity of Universes embracing every conceivable state of being?

 

…..Saxon Violence

[Vmedvil2]

I am a huge fan of the many worlds theory basically it states that due to Quantum Mechanics and how the probabilities of matter work that all possible outcomes within probability are carried out in parallel universes to ours meaning other dimensions, It is like the TV Series "Sliders" which is about using wormholes to travel between parallel universes, but I think the Idea of the many worlds theory is sound that, that is one of the ways to explain Quantum Mechanics that is in line with General Relativity. I have tried to build Parallel universe traveling devices many times over the years without much success but it is clear you would need a type of Wormhole to actually travel between Parallel universes/dimensions, String Theory highly predicts that these exist as normalization solution for physics between QM and GR. The Solution for Travel between Universes is a Quantum Entanglement bond between two spaces on both universes then it would create a bridge between universes, where ω_A - ω_B = 0 , being the spin states of a Black hole.   

ω_A - ω_B = 0 ≈ Up₁ + Down₂ - Down₁ + Up₂ = 0

 

 

Edited June 4, 2019 by VictorMedvil

[SaxonViolence]

Friend,

 

What I want to know—is there a theory where we can have MANY WORLDS without going down the Rabbit Hole of INFINITE WORLDS that encompass every possible world line hypothetically possible?

 

Because IF I understand the original "Many Worlds Interpretation," it hypothesizes that every time a sub-atomic particle comes to the tiniest of crossroads, then the worldliness branches in two.

 

"I have tried to build Parallel universe traveling devices many times over the years without much success"

 

Seriously?  :surprise:

 

I'd like to build a time machine, but I wouldn't have a clue where to begin. If I did, I'd be puttering at it incessantly and obsessively. I'd almost certainly fail, but  it wouldn't be a BAD obsession to be possessed by.

 

If you're serious and not resorting to tongue-in-cheek hyperbole, then:

 

A.} You're a bit of a crank—but an amusing one.

 

B.} I'm quite curious exactly where you hung your metaphorical sky-hook to anchor even the beginning of a hardware foundation.

 

 

…..Saxon Violence

 

BIG PS:

 

Actually, I travel to alternate worlds all of the time.

 

Faced with two Hypotheses:

 

Hypothesis X: I misplaced the magazine that I was reading yesterday.

 

And,

 

Hypothesis Y: I slipped into an Alternate Universe exactly like the one that I came for—Except that in this one, I put the magazine somewhere other than where I remember having left it.

 

Occam's Razor and Rational Analysis both point to the veracity of Hypothesis Y.

 

How could I ever be mistaken about something?

Edited June 4, 2019 by SaxonViolence

[Vmedvil2]

Friend,

 

What I want to know—is there a theory where we can have MANY WORLDS without going down the Rabbit Hole of INFINITE WORLDS that encompass every possible world line hypothetically possible?

 

Because IF I understand the original "Many Worlds Interpretation," it hypothesizes that every time a sub-atomic particle comes to the tiniest of crossroads, then the worldliness branches in two.

 

"I have tried to build Parallel universe traveling devices many times over the years without much success"

 

Seriously?  :surprise:

 

I'd like to build a time machine, but I wouldn't have a clue where to begin. If I did, I'd be puttering at it incessantly and obsessively. I'd almost certainly fail, but  it wouldn't be a BAD obsession to be possessed by.

 

If you're serious and not resorting to tongue-in-cheek hyperbole, then:

 

A.} You're a bit of a crank—but an amusing one.

 

B.} I'm quite curious exactly where you hung your metaphorical sky-hook to anchor even the beginning of a hardware foundation.

 

 

…..Saxon Violence

 

BIG PS:

 

Actually, I travel to alternate worlds all of the time.

 

Faced with two Hypotheses:

 

Hypothesis X: I misplaced the magazine that I was reading yesterday.

 

And,

 

Hypothesis Y: I slipped into an Alternate Universe exactly like the one that I came for—Except that in this one, I put the magazine somewhere other than where I remember having left it.

 

Occam's Razor and Rational Analysis both point to the veracity of Hypothesis Y.

 

How could I ever be mistaken about something?

 

Well one time I tried to Quantum Entangle an entire computer HDD the idea was that when the disk spins it would break the Quantum Entanglement bond and cause them to reform which would move the objects around the disk into another universe which was a way to move to another universe without a Black hole which didn't work. The concept behind the device was that you could make the Quantum Entanglement bonds so thick between the sectors of the disk that when they broke and reformed when the writing part of the disk hit them that it would create a Time-Warped field which didn't work.

Edited June 5, 2019 by VictorMedvil

[ralfcis]

Worm h*ly f#*k.

[Vmedvil2]

Worm h*ly f#*k.

 

So ya I may actually be from a slightly different Quantum reality, but I didn't notice any changes in the past that would depict that I moved between alternate universe, though Hillary Clinton may have won in my previous universe I dunno it was around the last presidential election. Even if I did notice changes in the past in this universe from my original Quantum Reality, do you think I would tell you?

 

Edited June 9, 2019 by VictorMedvil

[Vmedvil2]

There Geometry for the device I was going for.

 

HDD

Spinning HDD

Entanglement Tipler Cylinder HDD

Many Entanglement Wormhole Tipler Cylinder HDD

 

The geometry isn't quite right as the Manifold that it is fitting to is curved being a disk but something like that.

 

In any case, that was the geometry I was attempting to make a circular wormhole disk with entanglement bonds around a circular manifold like a Tipler Cylinder, This still isn't exactly correct but with image editing software it is difficult to draw.

 

In any case, this was the geometry of the Entanglement Time-core experiments I did, continuing the work of Frank J. Tipler in time warped fields.

Edited June 9, 2019 by VictorMedvil