New Evidence Could Finally Validate My Theory On Dark Matter

[Dubbelosix]

The size of black holes have been seriously under-estimated, these black holes we speak of can be and often are much much larger then first suspected. This means no additional physics has to be invented - we already have the necessary tools to explain rotation curves as a type of torsion effect. It is no coincidence that galaxies rotate in the direction of the host supermassive black hole, neither is it an accident that a typical spiral galaxy like our own harbors a black hole with enough gravitational binding energy equivalent to hold the galaxy together.

 

I still hold, that black holes came first and matter condensed around it, not the other way around.

 

http://www.sci-news.com/astronomy/ngc-4395s-central-black-hole-mass-07277.html?fbclid=IwAR0vQ6G1qWCIWhOWy__jEMWgfuVGbTbm5wuqYL_6o7mjSKE4YPUA86QMvUI

[Dubbelosix]

The real thing that needs to be investigated to invalidate the theory now, is if this black hole, much less than expected, presents any rotation curves.

[Vmedvil2]

When I went to Mt Kilauea in Hawaii I was able to see the Super-massive Black Hole(by a black void) in the middle of the galaxy, get a telescope or go to the telescope in Hawaii and check it out then. It is actually quite beautiful from that height, I pointed it out for the other people on the mountain that day, See if the Galactic rotational data matches your model by mapping the star's movement.

 

 

This Picture just doesn't do it justice I promise seeing it with your own eyes is much better, it is one of the best views you will ever get unless you go to space.

 

Edited June 17, 2019 by VictorMedvil