devin553344 Posted July 20, 2019 Author Report Posted July 20, 2019 I added the kinetic energy, which is the binding energy, of the electron orbiting the Hydrogen atom. Quote
devin553344 Posted July 20, 2019 Author Report Posted July 20, 2019 I worked out the force equation for the hydrogen atom. It's also in the OP at the bottom. Quote
devin553344 Posted July 21, 2019 Author Report Posted July 21, 2019 (edited) At least my wheels calculate and the units work. And by the way, the wheel wasn't calculating accurately, so yes I made a new one, that is accurate. And yes it is an alternate theory. Edited July 21, 2019 by devin553344 Quote
devin553344 Posted July 21, 2019 Author Report Posted July 21, 2019 Too true, Squire. Although my strong force idea I don't think has been created already. Quote
devin553344 Posted July 29, 2019 Author Report Posted July 29, 2019 Added some dimensional particles, charges and the fine structure to the OP equations at the bottom. Quote
devin553344 Posted July 30, 2019 Author Report Posted July 30, 2019 I added some new equations to the OP. I attempted to connect electromagnetic theory to gravitation and mass and dimension mapped the known charges, etc. One must allow that a n-sphere of radius solid angle is a quantification of Planck's constant and therefore may be used as a frequency. Quote
exchemist Posted July 30, 2019 Report Posted July 30, 2019 I added some new equations to the OP. I attempted to connect electromagnetic theory to gravitation and mass and dimension mapped the known charges, etc. One must allow that a n-sphere of radius solid angle is a quantification of Planck's constant and therefore may be used as a frequency.Word salad. (and Planck’s Constant is already quantified.) Quote
devin553344 Posted July 31, 2019 Author Report Posted July 31, 2019 (edited) Word salad. (and Planck’s Constant is already quantified.) The units work out and the values are precise. Perhaps it would be better to explain your trolls. Then maybe they wouldn't appear to be trolls. You apparently require my advice. The quantum is considered a wave particle duality and is therefore dimensional. Edited July 31, 2019 by devin553344 Quote
exchemist Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 The units work out and the values are precise. Perhaps it would be better to explain your trolls. Then maybe they wouldn't appear to be trolls. You apparently require my advice. The quantum is considered a wave particle duality and is therefore dimensional.More word salad. “The quantum” is a meaningless idea. Quote
Vmedvil2 Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 This Post gets my Crank label where is my crank stamp at. Quote
devin553344 Posted August 4, 2019 Author Report Posted August 4, 2019 I verified the equations and use of the exponent of solid angles at the end of the OP with a speed of light calculation. Quote
exchemist Posted August 4, 2019 Report Posted August 4, 2019 The exponent of solid angles............ Quote
devin553344 Posted August 6, 2019 Author Report Posted August 6, 2019 (edited) The exponent of solid angles............ It's 1, 4 and 5 dimensional magnitudes of base values or quantization yes........... Edited August 6, 2019 by devin553344 Quote
devin553344 Posted August 7, 2019 Author Report Posted August 7, 2019 I've added a GK relationship showing a solid angle when square rooting GK similar to the speed of light and permeability. It's at the end of the OP. Quote
devin553344 Posted August 7, 2019 Author Report Posted August 7, 2019 (edited) modified the electron-proton deviations from the median mass to match closer to a c reduction-increase. It now precisely calculates the strong force time dilation/mass increase Edited August 7, 2019 by devin553344 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.