infamous Posted August 24, 2005 Report Posted August 24, 2005 For those of you that unfarmiliar with the term "ground state blace hole", I'll need to bring you up to speed on the subject. John A Wheeler has written considerable on the subject and after I got aquainted with his writings concerning these issues I began to study the implications for it's significance. First I'll need to define exactly what "ground state black hole" means. Imagine a very large compact object such as a neutron star. Theory tells us, if we systemmatically add neutrons to this star one at a time, we'll eventually reach a point where it will collapse to form a black hole. There is speculation by some that in the interim a quark star will form but it's existence would be only short lived. In any case, the final state will be that of a black hole. Wheeler, in his book Gravitation Theory and Gravitational Collapse proposses an equation: Mo^2 = (hbar*c)^3/((G^3)*(mn^4)) Where Mo = the mass of the ground state black holeWhere hbar = Plank's constant divided by 2piWhere c = speed of light in a vacuumWhere G = the gravitational constantWhere mn = the mass of the neutron The value for M then equals approx: 3.6763 E+33 grams/cubic centimeter Using a formula that I discovered after calculating the values introduced in thread (A new look at dimensions) I have come up with the following formula: (ro)^3 = 2pi *(G)^9/(me*hbar^2)) Where ro = the scharzchild radiusWhere G = The gravitational constantWhere hbar = Plank's constant divided by 2piWhere me = the mass of the electron The value for ro then equals approx: 5.45899742 E+5 centimetersUsing the formula ro = 2G*Mo/c^2 everyone should be familiar with this formula We get the value for Mo as: 3.67631669 E +33 grams/cubic centimeter This value is in very close agreement with Wheeler's findings so I must conclude that this formula is of significance. Quote
Erasmus00 Posted August 24, 2005 Report Posted August 24, 2005 Using a formula that I discovered after calculating the values introduced in thread (A new look at dimensions) I have come up with the following formula: (ro)^3 = 2pi *(G)^9/(me*hbar^2)) Where ro = the scharzchild radiusWhere G = The gravitational constantWhere hbar = Plank's constant divided by 2piWhere me = the mass of the electron Your units are way off. G is in distance^3/(mass*time^2). hbar is distance^2*mass/time. So your formula comes out distance^3 = distance^23/(mass^11*time^16), which clearly isn't an equality. -Will Quote
infamous Posted August 24, 2005 Author Report Posted August 24, 2005 Your units are way off. G is in distance^3/(mass*time). hbar is distance^2*mass/time. So your formula comes out distance^3 = distance^23/(mass^11*time^7), which clearly isn't an equality. -WillAre you also disagreeing with Wheelers results? Quote
Erasmus00 Posted August 24, 2005 Report Posted August 24, 2005 Are you also disagreeing with Wheelers results? No, his formula's units work out fine. It's your formula that has mismatched units, as I said. -Will Quote
infamous Posted August 24, 2005 Author Report Posted August 24, 2005 No, his formula's units work out fine. It's your formula that has mismatched units, as I said.-WillYes I see this now, thanks for putting up with this until I was able to see the point. I'll take this into account from now on when I'm calculating with these values. Thanks for your interest............infamous Quote
Dark Mind Posted September 8, 2005 Report Posted September 8, 2005 Continued interest showing... please continue :shrug:. Quote
infamous Posted September 30, 2005 Author Report Posted September 30, 2005 Could it be possible that the universe is one 'gigantic black hole'? The Bible concurs that the universe was created with a big bang but the root translation of the Hebrew words states that the big bang was a 'collapse' of something.There appear to be some similarities between our universe and the concept of a black hole. However, most cosmologists disagree that it can be strictly interpretated as the same state for both. I'm no authority myself so like most all I possess is an opinion. The fact remains that there is very little we really know about black holes and also prescious little we have determined about the big bang. When all the facts are in, we may find that there is little or no difference between the two, my own view is that when we learn more about black holes we will also learn much about the big bang itself. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.