Jump to content
Science Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

I suppose the tired light probably is a type of deceleration radiation analagous to how the electron experiences the Larmor radiation. I shouldn't hijack this thread any more so will try and write up a better foundation in time.

Posted (edited)

 

But it's not a constant, even Einstein demonstrated this from general relativity, it is only a true constant as we understand it, in a vacuum. What Einstein didn't seem to accept was that if light was spatially variable, it is also temporally variable which is interesting he could not accept that part, because it meant even his theory was incomplete and believing it is temporally variable also meant it would cause contradictions by the principles he set in place for special relativity.

 

 

Let's sort out the whole process:

1. Morey's experiment, at that time, scientists could not explain it with Newton's theory.

2. Constant speed of light is applied to Lorentz transformation.

3. Einstein put forward the hypothesis that the speed of light is constant and established special relativity.

 

But now we can easily explain the Morey experiment with classical physics, and conclude that it is wrong to keep the speed of light constant.

 

Special relativity is a fallacy under the wrong premise.

Why Morley Experiment Could Not Observe the Movement of Interference fringe.pdf

Edited by TonyYuan2020

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...