Research Indicates A Spherical Universe

[Dubbelosix]

His approach is different to mine, the equation he uses is not for a geometric flow, but this is interesting someone else has the same inclination as I have not read this outside my own work.

[Dubbelosix]

By geometric flow, I mean volumetric.

[Dubbelosix]

It could have something to do with quantum foam, I still cannot rule it out...

 

I haven't extensively read Verlinde as you have so some direction on Ricci flow application would be appreciated. Also I have not abandoned my model for a mechanical explanation for cosmological constant as it leads to an intuitive reason why expansion increases over time dueto a weakening of, first on small scales then on larger.

[OverUnityDeviceUAP]

Guys stop circle jerking articles citations references and hyperlinks.

 

I have volumes, geometries, vectors, psymatics and polar mechanics. I have the correct remedy for any ailment, that resets the desired past. Those who know me know my price, I dont give a flying ef about a green piece of paper or a number in my bank account. Il straight, and I only want one thing. And I dont like taf.

[OverUnityDeviceUAP]

I'd go out truth saying and say I like athletic females then "gahd" would probably ban me on human trafficking as 5rade for a space force that can alter reality

[OceanBreeze]

 

Okay so I have a completed system to tackle these developments along with some more.

 

Vectors # 3 & 7 are inert.

 

After 1 sphere, with 5 vectors, & we have a 5 charge evolution for one Planck sphere turning into a couple entangled strings

 

Then 9 spheres gives 10 vectors and 8 charges. Spherical coordinates along vectors 3&7 do not experience dislocation.

 

And then 73 spheres, 20 vectors, & 13 charges. The inert vectors go evenly or oddly every other vector if you can

..get it? THINK FOR ONE SECOND PEOPLE

 

 

 

I have thought for one second, and one second was enough for me to ask why have we not yet banned this person?

 

Maybe someone can come up with a good reason. Then again, maybe not . . .

[exchemist]

I have thought for one second, and one second was enough for me to ask why have we not yet banned this person?

 

Maybe someone can come up with a good reason. Then again, maybe not . . .

This forum seems happy to let itself become the last refuge for the cranks and nutters banned everywhere else. But with this poster new depths are being plumbed. It's like descending the Mariana Trench.

 

Unless of course the whole thing is an act, parodying Dubblesocks, in which case one has to say it was a god joke at first but is wearing a little thin.   

[OverUnityDeviceUAP]

What you're going to ban me for creating my own universes?

[OverUnityDeviceUAP]

As sphere based they encompass all other possible geometries ya know.

 

Including your own deranged pov

Edited December 10, 2019 by OverUnityDeviceUAP

[Dubbelosix]

As sphere based they encompass all other possible geometries ya know.

Including your own deranged pov

 

Never seen a sphere in five dimensions? The answer to whether a sphere contains all possible geometries is clearly wrong. At best it is a subset of higher geometries.

[Dubbelosix]

Though maybe we should think of spheres even above five since many consider the five dimensional sphere as the hypersphere which the latter remains four dimensional.

[OverUnityDeviceUAP]

As per the the sum of its area and volume a sphere contains more space than any other 3 dimensional geometry. Every 3 dimensional shape combined is a sphere.

[Dubbelosix]

No it doesn't, in space, a fourth leg of the triangle is what allows space to manifest observable geometry, a curved sphere in 4D space only encompasses three spatial and one temporal dimension alone. Its not any more special than that. Hypersphere in higher dimensions, clearly has additional physics not encapsulated in a four dimensional model. More over the sphere is no more intriguing than a box in four dimensions (tesseract).

[OverUnityDeviceUAP]

I have yet to see you animate any of these higher dimensional setups.

 

I have in fact the know how of how to create 2d circular strings that are the basis of every 3d spherical quark, gluon, electron, positron, photon, and neutrino

Edited December 17, 2019 by OverUnityDeviceUAP

[OverUnityDeviceUAP]

And more, tachyons

[OverUnityDeviceUAP]

I know the strings that entangle the ripples

[Dubbelosix]

There's plenty of animations on the net of these higher dimensional objects, but they appeal to crackpots because its a super cool buzzword. Just like people who fascinate superfluously in tachyon fields and other unlikely phenomenon stringed together incoherently and unintelligible.

Edited December 17, 2019 by Dubbelosix