pittsburghjoe Posted April 3, 2020 Author Report Posted April 3, 2020 Most of the light we see day-to-day is not decohered and therefore not photons until wave collapse at the end of its path. Incoherent light does not cause decoherence on coherent light waves? Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 3, 2020 Author Report Posted April 3, 2020 Do we have verifiable evidence that it starts out physical besides math? Don't get be wrong, I want it to be physical because it would mean future decoherence events are known to the quantum field. Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 3, 2020 Author Report Posted April 3, 2020 According to the math it does, but no one is getting how profound this is. Apparently, the quantum field knows of future decoherence events. Or coherent waves don't have a future time limit on becoming physical. Coherent waves are everywhere, including the future. Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 3, 2020 Author Report Posted April 3, 2020 Is coherence the medium in which quantum waves propagate? Does coherence also exist in the future to flag decoherence events? Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 3, 2020 Author Report Posted April 3, 2020 Coherence is for quantum waves that can entangle, tunnel, and be in superposition. Decoherence is for physical/classical particles. Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 3, 2020 Author Report Posted April 3, 2020 Wake up people, this is the UNIFIED THEORY. Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 3, 2020 Author Report Posted April 3, 2020 Somewhere around 50,000 bonded atoms will automatically be decohered. Anything smaller requires a decoherence event in its path to be classical. Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 3, 2020 Author Report Posted April 3, 2020 Do the electric and magnetic waves remain when decohered? Is the EM spectrum always ageless, because they run at the speed of light? Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 4, 2020 Author Report Posted April 4, 2020 If an object needs a decoherence event in its path to decohere, is it physical/real after the event? Is it still a group of wave packets, but only condensed now? Does it take around 50,000 bonded atoms to be physical particles? Quote
GAHD Posted April 4, 2020 Report Posted April 4, 2020 I'm getting the felling you're using "coherence" and it grammar cousins as buzzwords without actually knowing what they mean. You've got around a half dozen threads here with some variant of the word. What gives? Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 4, 2020 Author Report Posted April 4, 2020 This means I was very wrong about decoherence causing physical/real particles. Decoherence is causing condensed wave packets that give the impression they are physical. Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 4, 2020 Author Report Posted April 4, 2020 Is decohered-condensed wave packets a new state of matter? Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 4, 2020 Author Report Posted April 4, 2020 Decoherence and Wave collapse are not the same thing. Wave collapse is when a particle hits a physical object and dead stops. Decoherence is a particle being measured in flight and allowed to continue moving on its path. Decoherence now means all quantum particles are not physical/real ..they are condensed wave packets that give the appearance they are physical/real after a decoherence event. Coherence is the state a wave has to be in to perform quantum weirdness events. Coherence is orderly waves. Coherence is the world of the unobservable. Did we overlook one crucial detail about duality? Duality is not a physical/wave object. It is never physical, it is either waves or condensed wave packets (decoherence). Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 5, 2020 Author Report Posted April 5, 2020 Are plane waves coherent as they live in their respective quantum fields as unobservable? Is a wave packet decohered and a composite of all the plane waves that makeup the "object"? Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 5, 2020 Author Report Posted April 5, 2020 Does the standard model tell us that each quantum field has its own coherent plane wave? And that decoherence causes the waves to combine into a single wave packet? Plane waves are infinite and fall out of coherence with future decoherence events. Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 5, 2020 Author Report Posted April 5, 2020 Does decoherence cause wave packets before the decoherence event because quantum fields do not use distance or time (aka spacetime)? Are wave packets using spacetime and the reason they can not be in superposition, entangle, or tunnel? Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 5, 2020 Author Report Posted April 5, 2020 (edited) Do any of you grasp what I’ve solved here? Wave packets are not physical despite the connotations. They are not just for light, matter waves can be a wave packet also. Duality of a free particle is many plane waves to a single wave. It’s like going from digital to analog (the many layers of infinite coherent quantum fields are digital/virtual/holographic). Decoherence triggers many plane waves to compile into a single wave packet. The quantum fields don’t use space and time, they are filled with coherent plane waves. Compiled wave packets are restricted via spacetime. Decoherence and Wave collapse are not the same thing. Wave collapse is when a particle hits a physical object and dead stops. Decoherence is a particle being measured in flight and allowed to continue moving on its path. Wave collapse does not influence the state of the wave in flight. The measurement problem is not a problem anymore. Coherence is the state a wave has to be in to perform quantum weirdness events (superposition, entangle, and tunnel). Edited April 5, 2020 by pittsburghjoe Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.