pittsburghjoe Posted April 15, 2020 Report Posted April 15, 2020 Maybe the golden ratio (1.61803398875) gets mixed in somehow?Does this lead to an explanation to 3.57 cycles being chaos? Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 15, 2020 Author Report Posted April 15, 2020 Does chaos start at 3.57 because that is the circumference of the circle representing the cycle? That circle is a snapshot/horizontal slice of a vertical/3d golden ratio. A cycle flows/advances on the path of the ratio. From the side it looks a like zig zag doing a downward funneled spiral. At any given time a snapshot can be taken, from the top that looks like a complete circle. Something is happening to the flow between 3.57 and 3.83 I should update the circles in my first post, they need to be scaling in size per cycle. Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 15, 2020 Author Report Posted April 15, 2020 (edited) I think spacetime is doing whatever it is at that ratio. Spacetime is the number one suspect with anything involving our reality. OR it is region that superposition is allowed, in which case, spacetime is not involved. Edited April 15, 2020 by pittsburghjoe Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 15, 2020 Author Report Posted April 15, 2020 (edited) Feignenbaum’s constant isn’t 1.61803398875 (golden radio) because the golden ratio is 3D, it is getting skewed/stretched to 4.669 Edited April 15, 2020 by pittsburghjoe Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 16, 2020 Author Report Posted April 16, 2020 If spacetime is quadratic, does it mean a bifurcation diagram can describe it? Can math or numbers be in superposition? Does the fabric of spacetime have something to do with the Mandelbrot set? Can Pi be used to take a top-down snapshot of a vertical/3D progressing golden ratio? Is this what time is? Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 16, 2020 Author Report Posted April 16, 2020 Would the speed of light be an even 300,000,000 if spacetime wasn't taxing the system to run its simulation? Does it take 207,542 cycles to run the fabric of spacetime? Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 16, 2020 Author Report Posted April 16, 2020 Does Pi x Pi = a time cycle? Has anyone noticed the multiplying results bifurcate? Is there something to the result of ^17 being close to our speed of light? 282,844,563.5865327 Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 16, 2020 Author Report Posted April 16, 2020 (edited) First digit for each instance Pi is multiplied by Pi: 9,3,9,3,9,3,9,2,9,2,9,2,9,2,9,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,1,6,1,6,1 Edited April 17, 2020 by pittsburghjoe Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 16, 2020 Author Report Posted April 16, 2020 9,3,9,3,9,3,9,2,9,2,9,2,9,2,9,2, 8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2, 7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2, 6,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,1,6,1,6,1,.... Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 16, 2020 Author Report Posted April 16, 2020 I think it takes 17 cycles of Pi to run the fabric of spacetime. Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 17, 2020 Author Report Posted April 17, 2020 (edited) 9,3,9,3,9,3,9,2,9,2,9,2,9,2,9,2, 8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2, 7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2, 6,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,1,6,1,6,1,6,1, 5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1, 4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1, 3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,9,3,9,3,9,3,9, 2,9,2,9,2,9,2,9,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,7,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6,2,6, 1,6,1,6,1,6,1,6,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,5,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,4,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3,1,3, 9,3,9,3,9,3,9,2,9,2,9,2,9,2,9,2, 8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2,8,2, Do any of you understand how big of deal this is? Pi x Pi is at the root. Edited April 17, 2020 by pittsburghjoe Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 17, 2020 Author Report Posted April 17, 2020 Each time you multiply Pi it's like you are getting an answer from two separate pi objects. It seems to be going back and forth like a particle with two instances of decoherence in its path. Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 17, 2020 Author Report Posted April 17, 2020 (edited) I wonder if each digit represents an instruction set for the fabric of spacetime. There are 350 digits before repeating. If it is bifurcating, does it mean that pi x pi is naturally a quadratic map? You know what else is naturally a quadratic map? The fabric of spacetime. Are they the same thing? It seems math itself is making an exception for Pi ..it is almost treating it like it is alive. Edited April 17, 2020 by pittsburghjoe Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 18, 2020 Author Report Posted April 18, 2020 (edited) Chaos 3.57 is chaos because when multiplied in the same fashion as Pi is chaos in comparison! It is also why Pi starts off bifurcated ..3.14 is after 3.0 Edited April 18, 2020 by pittsburghjoe Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 18, 2020 Author Report Posted April 18, 2020 (edited) Do bifurcation diagrams give us a map of how certain numbers will behave when multiplied by themselves? A quadratic map is an x times an x ..it all makes sense now I think the Mandelbrot set will tell us how complex/imaginary numbers multiply. We are going to find out the Mandelbrot set is a virtual object that sits at the core of math. Edited April 18, 2020 by pittsburghjoe Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 18, 2020 Author Report Posted April 18, 2020 Chaos is 3.57 because multiplying 3.57 with itself is giving chaotic results by way of the first digit. Does a bifurcation diagram show us every number that will display chaos? Is Pi bifurcated from the start because bifurcation diagrams bifurcate at 3.0 not 3.14? Is the Mandelbrot Set where infinity meets the math to the fabric of spacetime or the quantum fields? I think we will find that the Mandelbrot set is all around us just like the signal from the CMB. Quote
pittsburghjoe Posted April 18, 2020 Author Report Posted April 18, 2020 Is Feigenbaum's constant (4.669) because it is almost 75% of a complete mathematical cycle? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.