balagna Posted June 28, 2020 Report Posted June 28, 2020 (edited) how to decide some long sentences would be really correct?in one of my papers, I quoted one sentence directly from another article that had previously been published in a ssci indexed journal. but I see in editor's report an implicaton; stating that that quoted sentence was incorrect. to whom should I believe? Edited June 28, 2020 by balagna Quote
montgomery Posted June 29, 2020 Report Posted June 29, 2020 So let's have a look at the sentence. Quote
balagna Posted July 12, 2020 Author Report Posted July 12, 2020 (edited) A psychological phenomenon of subliminal perception, that is,exposing subjects to stimuli which they are not consciously aware and search for effects of those stimuli,has attracted and perplexed researchers.(Eric,David & Lamp,1983) sorry presumably this journal is not indexed by ssci (ts reuters). but again this journal seems trusted/trustable.I prefer providing doi here for a way how to reach article: DOI:10.1080/00913367.1983.10672829 the peer says "this paragraph is not clear" Edited July 12, 2020 by balagna Quote
montgomery Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 (Eric,David & Lamp,1983) ??? Let's get that out of the way before we work on the sentence. Quote
GAHD Posted July 12, 2020 Report Posted July 12, 2020 how to decide some long sentences would be really correct?in one of my papers, I quoted one sentence directly from another article that had previously been published in a ssci indexed journal. but I see in editor's report an implicaton; stating that that quoted sentence was incorrect. to whom should I believe?Te setence itself is strange, yes. I think the issue is that your citation is 2 first names and one last name. The article is published by Zanot, Pincus, & Lamp (1983) Quote
balagna Posted July 12, 2020 Author Report Posted July 12, 2020 (edited) Te setence itself is strange, yes. I think the issue is that your citation is 2 first names and one last name. The article is published by Zanot, Pincus, & Lamp (1983)oh my dear , oh my goodness, oh my gosh! :) :) :) what do I see here?the one who feels himself way proud of his english is making some very very lovely mistakes here. oh my god ! :) :) :) anyway, which sentence do you claim that it was strange. (a notation: if you claim mine, it almost always has had potentiality to be written mistakely ...but if you imply/claim the cited sentence,then I will presumably not accept that) :) Edited July 12, 2020 by balagna Quote
balagna Posted July 12, 2020 Author Report Posted July 12, 2020 (edited) (Eric,David & Lamp,1983) ??? Let's get that out of the way before we work on the sentence.yes,you are right at this point. I do not know why I did do such an interesting failure. but are you sure that peer does not imply the sentence itself? Edited July 12, 2020 by balagna Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.