Jump to content
Science Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, 

 

4200 BC Aadam

3900 BC

3600 BC

3300 BC

3000 BC

2700 BC

2400 BC Noah

2100 BC Abraham

1800 BC Josef

1500 BC Moses

1200 BC Eknaton?

900 BC Salomon

600 BC Nebukadnessar

300 BC Alexander the Great

0 BC Jesus

300 AD Contantin the Great

600 AD Muhammed (pbuh)

900 AD Closters, Munks, Cluny

1200 AD Dominicans, Jesuits and so on Knights

1500 AD Protestants

1800 AD French Revolution

2100 AD Veda Revolution (India)

2400 AD ????

 

Can it be just a coincidence that those greatest men of world history appeared 600 BC, 300 BC, 0 BC, 300 AD, 600 AD ???

I can easily see that there is some kind of cycle of 300 years REVOLUTIONS. There are only two weak spots 900 AD and 1200 AD or at least they seem weak spots because there was then THE DARK MIDDLE-AGE.

 

 

 

 

Posted (edited)

Hi, 

 

4200 BC Aadam

3900 BC

3600 BC

3300 BC

3000 BC

2700 BC

2400 BC Noah

2100 BC Abraham

1800 BC Josef

1500 BC Moses

1200 BC Eknaton?

900 BC Salomon

600 BC Nebukadnessar

300 BC Alexander the Great

0 BC Jesus

300 AD Contantin the Great

600 AD Muhammed (pbuh)

900 AD Closters, Munks, Cluny

1200 AD Dominicans, Jesuits and so on Knights

1500 AD Protestants

1800 AD French Revolution

2100 AD Veda Revolution (India)

2400 AD ????

 

Can it be just a coincidence that those greatest men of world history appeared 600 BC, 300 BC, 0 BC, 300 AD, 600 AD ???

I can easily see that there is some kind of cycle of 300 years REVOLUTIONS. There are only two weak spots 900 AD and 1200 AD or at least they seem weak spots because there was then THE DARK MIDDLE-AGE.

You believe in a false God. All of this is nonsense as you are using a "False Timeline". What about 90 million years ago was there raptor Jesus?

 

hputqpz1yery.jpg

 

Edited by VictorMedvil
Posted

""You believe in a false God. All of this is nonsense as you are using a "False Timeline". What about 90 million years ago was there raptor Jesus?""

 

Time has not been a problem for me or anybody else since Albert Einstein's theories. Of course there has been "ZILLIONS" of years or as well only 10000 years which is accepted possibility by Einstein theories too. But I do not close my eyes if there is a clear evidence of a certain cycles in the history. This saying : History repeats itself may as well be true than false. Those 300 years Revolutions may seem to be religious or cultural revolutions but I only chose those religious names because everyone knows them. There could be made another kind of name list too.

 

As far as I know the Church History is quite an important part of ordinary history too. I do not want to walk with my eyes closed and all blind just because this Jesus fellow and other fellows has won some part in the pages of history books and even hearts. It is true that I have read about all religions many books but IT IS ONLY BECAUSE IN MY COUNTRY THERE WAS NOT BEFORE THE INTERNET AND WWW ANY SERIOUSLY TAKEN SCIENTIFIC BOOKS AVAILABLE ALMOST AT ALL. NOWADAYS I HAVE BEEN ABLE TO FIND GOOD SCIENTIFIC BOOKS IN THE NET BUT THERE IS NOT ENOUGH TIME TO READ THEM VIA SCREEN. I NEEDED PAPER COPIES INSTEAD BUT THERE ARE NONE AVAILABLE.

 

You are lucky to have been able to read many good scientific books anytime you want to. After all what was Jesus compared to Herodotus?

Posted

Hi,

 

Yes there is no Great Revolution precisely every 300 years. But almost (within +- 60 years) then. 

Of course there is no need to mix religious stories and fairytales with history as science.

But still I refuse to close my eyes and to have any blind spots.

 

Of course for instance The book of Enoch is full of fairytales and that book includes the story of Exodus about

two thousand (+-) years earlier than Moses claim it to be happened.

 

Moses likely did not exist 

 

PS There is absolutely no historical evidence the mythical Jesus ever existed. 

 

I would agree very eagerly but prophet Muhammed (pbuh) should belong to the same list then. He claims to be the

seal of all earlier religious persons and even of those religious persons that COME AFTER HIM.

For instance there is this story about Caitanya Mahabrabhu in India which story can not prove to be correct any way.

And there was this Sri Prabhupada in the USA 1970s but according to islam there will be time in the future that only

Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) can confirm his EXISTENCE. He shall always be the only religious person whose existence

can not be denied. And that is pity?

 

All religious persons are doomed to vanish from the history books and their existence can not ever be proved without islam.

Anyway if islam is correct in that prophet Muhammed (pbuh) is the seal.

 

Sorry about that Eknaton. I ought to have checked his date myself but I am too lazy. If I recall correct there was Ramses

1200 BC century but again I am too lazy to check. Sorry about that. I try later write better.

Posted

Mohammed did exist and he has living descendants. Islam is also incorporates the old testament and other fairy stories from earlier religions.

 

Edit If you wanted to I bet you could easily work up a revolution somewhere in the world every 500 years or 333 years etc, ie pick a number then scroll through the history books, and if you are using +/- 50 years as an acceptable event, It should be easy to make up some little conspiracy supported by historical events :)

And yet, The Muslims and Christians fight like cats and dogs. I bet if a Christian and Muslim were to sit down together, they might realize how similar their religion really is. Not to mention even the Catholic nuns dress up a lot like the women do in middle eastern countries.

  • 11 months later...
Posted

and it seems like there comes every second time revolution for aristocrat and every second time for common folk.

2100 bc aristocrat, 1800 bc folk, 1500 bc aristocrat, 1200 bc folk, 900 bc aristocrat, 600 bc folk, 300 bc aristocrat, 0 bc folk, 300 aristocrat, 600 folk, 900 aristocrat, 1200 folk, 1500 aristocrat, 1800 folk, 2100 aristocrat. . . .

can it be so? Was dr Luther really fighting for aristocrat or for common folk? It ought to be studied by someone wiser than I.

 

  • 5 months later...
Posted

There is not just Evolution in biology but all kinds of Evolution in a different fields.  And the bigger load you can carry slower the Evolution gets.

Agriculture 1000 kg 1000 years

Industry 500 kg 500 years

Culture 300 kg 300 years

Religion 100 kg 100 years

Military 10 kg 10 years

Biology 0.00001 kg 1 minute 

Computers 0.00000001 kg 1 second

So when we reach nanoscale the Evolution is quickest possible.

Religion 100 kg comes because of the weight of a man. Islam tells Mujaddid comes every 100 years.

 

Posted
On 1/13/2022 at 9:51 PM, Diamonds said:

There is not just Evolution in biology but all kinds of Evolution in a different fields.  And the bigger load you can carry slower the Evolution gets.

Agriculture 1000 kg 1000 years

Industry 500 kg 500 years

Culture 300 kg 300 years

Religion 100 kg 100 years

Military 10 kg 10 years

Biology 0.00001 kg 1 minute 

Computers 0.00000001 kg 1 second

So when we reach nanoscale the Evolution is quickest possible.

Religion 100 kg comes because of the weight of a man. Islam tells Mujaddid comes every 100 years.

 

What sort of crackpottery is this, I told you, you believe in false religion and a false messiah.

Posted
On 1/14/2022 at 9:51 AM, Diamonds said:

There is not just Evolution in biology but all kinds of Evolution in a different fields.  And the bigger load you can carry slower the Evolution gets.

Agriculture 1000 kg 1000 years

Industry 500 kg 500 years

Culture 300 kg 300 years

Religion 100 kg 100 years

Military 10 kg 10 years

Biology 0.00001 kg 1 minute 

Computers 0.00000001 kg 1 second

So when we reach nanoscale the Evolution is quickest possible.

Religion 100 kg comes because of the weight of a man. Islam tells Mujaddid comes every 100 years.

 

Now you are changing the topic from revolution to evolution?

I don't understand where you are getting your kg numbers from; actually your entire post makes no sense at all to me, except perhaps this one sentence: "So when we reach nanoscale the Evolution is quickest possible"

This is certainly true in the case of viruses, as explained briefly in this article:

Viruses mutate very quickly

The major reason that viruses evolve faster than say, mosquitoes or snakes or bed bugs, is because they multiply faster than other organisms. And that means every new individual is an opportunity for new mutations as they make a copy of their genetic material.

Many of those mutations have no noticeable effect. But every once in a while, one might help the organism survive — for example, by letting viruses infect not just birds, but people, too.

Even among viruses, though, there's a wide variation in mutation rates. HIV, for example, is a very fast mutator. That's because it multiplies especially rapidly — one virus particle will produce about 10 million viruses within 24 hours. What's more, HIV's genetic material is not DNA, but RNA, which is more likely to develop mutations when copied.

Other fast mutators include coronaviruses like MERS and SARS. Influenza viruses are fairly fast mutators, although that varies from strain to strain. That's one reason why flu vaccines are often only effective for a short while.

source: https://www.vox.com/2014/6/27/5846900/how-viruses-stay-one-step-ahead-of-our-efforts-to-kill-them

Other than that one sentence, the rest of your post looks very strange. Are you sure you are OK?

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I am o.k. It just Came in my mind this image when I tried to think other possible cycles for revolution. Cycles like 10 to 5000 years. 10, 50, 100, 300, 500, 1000, 2000, 5000 etc.

Image that heavier things are more Time it takes to invent them. Of course I am just guessing. Not knowing. Cultural Evolution I guess changes model of 10 kg product more often than 50000 kg products model? Sorry bout my lousy english. 

This message was not important but just an image in my mind. Simple one.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I went trought bibliographic data in an encyclopaedia and found out that it is easy to arrange every title of the books in a line so that there is 300 years gap between each title.

For instance if a scientist has written 7 books each having a title of its own those books can be arranged in a time line of 2100 years all having 300 years gap between them.

Just remember that many of the books must be placed in a future time. 

0 religious theme in the title, 300 byzantic theme, 600 Islam theme, 900 russian or german theme or closters, 1200 church theme, 1500 reformation theme, 1800 revolution theme, 2100 India vedic theme, 2400  ???? Theme, 2700 ???? Theme etc.

This gives you interesting New visions about the past history and about the future. 

To place each book in a correct century is very easy if you are good in history.

 

 

 

  • 4 months later...
Posted

In the Bible there are often lists of words and Solomon said for each thing there is its own age. Some say one age is 360 years some say 490 years but this 300 years for one age is perhaps as good as any.

 

Isaiah 3:2

Hero 300 bc Alexander, warrior 0 ad Caesar or Christ, judge 300 ad Constantin, prophet 600 ad Muhammed, diviner 900 ad Vladimir or Otto, elder 1200 ad ????, captain of 50 - 1500 ad Luther or Kolumbus, honourable man 1800 ad Revolution in USA and France, counsellor 2100 ad ?????, skilled craftsman 2400 ad ?????, clever enchanter 2700 ad ?????, 

For each purpose there is its own age. List of words in many books are interesting if you use this method.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Hello!

So for instance when we look from the encyclopaedia what Murry, John has written we can place each of his books on a timeline giving 300 years for each of them:

The Evolution of an Inttelectual 900 AD

Countries of the Mind 1200 AD

The Life of Jesus 1500 AD

The Necessity of Communism 1800 AD

Unprofessional Essays 2100 AD

Love, Freedom and Society 2400 AD

 

1200 were universities where countries where in mind.

1500 was protestants and religion changed.

2100 was www and internet with Unprofessional essays 

And so on. 

This is not only history but futurology too. If you have time to study bibliographies this way you will find many, many interesting things.

 

  • 1 year later...
Posted

If we use bibliographies how long in the future or past can we predict future events?

Sci fi Writer A.E. van Vogt published 43 books. I have placed them all between the years 0 AD - 12700 AD.

This goes Along with the Gospel of Barnabas timelines. Planetoids like Sedna or Eris will be reached about year 12000 AD according to Barnabas. Here are few from those 43 books placed in the timeline 

Slan   0 AD, the Weapon Makers 300 AD, the Book of Ptath 600 AD, Out of the unknown 900 AD, the World of Null-A 1200 AD, the House that stood still 1500 AD, the voyage of the space Beagle 1800 AD, the Weapon Shops of Isher 2100 AD, Away and Beyond 2400 AD, Destination universe 2700 AD, the Mixed men 3000 AD, the Universe Maker 3600 AD..... etc

So why do I trust this timing is right. Because I compare the information found in other books with this bibliography. 

1800 was the voyage of Darwin

2700 will be Brahma in Power according to hare krishna books

3000 will be Resurrection according to Bible and the title Mixed men seems to be all right with that. 

 

It is not sure however yet that this method is allways correct. But more you learn about the future and past facts mentioned in all religious and other texts more precisce your timing will be. I hope!

This may sound nonsense and I have not tested this method much yet and I have asked AI to tell about Futurology science which is real science compared to this. If you stick with real science you may be happier but not so .....

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Are these revolutions worldwide allways or are they just local. I think that there is a tendency toward their influence concerning less and less People when more times go on. 

600 bc Nebukadnessar 16 milliard folk, 300 bc Alexander 8 milliard folk, 0 ad Jesus 4 milliard folk, 300 ad constantinus 2 milliard folk, 600 ad Muhammed (saas) 1 milliard folk, 900 ad Otto and Vladimir 500 million folk, 1200 ad Tsinghish Khan 250 million folk, 1500 ad Luther and Calvin 125 million folk, 1800 ad Washington and Napoleon 62.5 million folk, 2100 ad Vyasadeva 31.25 million folk and so on.....

This tendency means that there is need for Messiah allways lesser amount of folk when time goes on. 

Those earlier messiah made happy most of the People of the world. Now there are only small groups of People needing revolution and messiah. 

So today every nation 31.25 million population needs a messiah. 

Ukraine,  Iraq,  Venezuela, Spain,  Poland,  Kenya,  Tanzania  etc. 

There are many wars going on concerning these nations.

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...