xersan Posted September 7, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 7, 2005 I have often helped people on these boards that ask questions because they are here to learn, without trying to assert that current physics is wrong before having understood it. Anyway, proper time is the time coordinate in the object's rest frame, that in which the object is at rest. I don't want to believe that a moderator has negative prejudices for the members. I am feeling necessity of clarificatıon: Those are advenced determinings The well-known formula of time dilation is derived by lightclock (Lightclock uses the reflecting light between two mirrors instead of pendulum). The angle of mirrors according to direction of general motion affects the tempo of time dilation. If mirrors are parallel with the general orbit: t’ = t / sqrt(1 – v2/c2) (*) If mirrors are perpendicular : t’ = t/ (1 – v2/c2) Attention: not sqrt The values for other directions are interval of these values. Light clock runs by time dilation in relative system and it doesn’t include proper time certainly.Also Lorentz’s transformations don’t contain proper time certainly. Because, these equations give the values according to relative frame. Lightclock and SR are not same things. Einstein had claimed that this formula is derived by Lorentz’s equations. But Lorentz’s equations never give this (*) formula. He had assembled it there. And this trick has not been distinguished since today. This illusion is very successful. You may ask to me Why is the term t' bigger than t at time clock's formulas (*). Why is the term t' different according to direction of light? The answer is interesting that it appears things which Einstein could not distinguished Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xersan Posted September 13, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 13, 2005 I prefer to be a ostrich instead of meeting with reality face to face. L.B.G Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justforfun Posted September 13, 2005 Report Share Posted September 13, 2005 Thanks for your high polite. I know the proper time. I had wanted to learn what you understoodDear Xersan: Your lack of grammar exposes you. You are the product of nonordinary reality. Are you lost? Good. You'll fit right in. - Zardoz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xersan Posted September 16, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2005 Dear Xersan: Your lack of grammar exposes you. You are the product of nonordinary reality. Are you lost? Good. You'll fit right in. - Zardoz The familiar formula (A) of time dilation is derived with the light which at the perpendicular direction according to direction of relative system’s motion. But Lorentz’s transformations (:hihi: are derived by the parallel light with relative system’s direction. The theory of SR claims that The deformations of dimensions are never determined for perpendicular direction, because relative speed is zero. But the relations (A) and (:evil: are confused by somebody. Also Einstein had confused in person. He was very successful magician. Because, he could bewitched himself. He was a victim because of his mystic passion, and he is an idol by others who have blinkers. In history, the members of tribes had required a sorcerer for their agnostic/mystic necessities. The members of modern community prefer Einstein as a magician for GLOBAL TRIBE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.