Jay-qu Posted September 22, 2005 Report Posted September 22, 2005 I think you missed the point damocles - for example: a liar (someone that always lies) cant tell you he lies because then he would be telling the truth... Quote
goku Posted September 22, 2005 Report Posted September 22, 2005 does anyone here have a PHD?are you sure? what do you do with it?i have one, but never went to colledge. Quote
Dark Mind Posted September 22, 2005 Report Posted September 22, 2005 ...They're paradoxes ;). You can't really answer them ;). Quote
Jay-qu Posted September 22, 2005 Report Posted September 22, 2005 yeah thats what I was trying to say... How about the grandfather paradox(or grandmother)If you went back in time and killed your grandfather what would happen? well assuming it was before your father/mother was born than you wont be born - then you wont be able to come back and kill him in the future so you will be born...and so on Quote
damocles Posted September 22, 2005 Report Posted September 22, 2005 ...They're paradoxes ;). You can't really answer them ;). Really? That is another paradox. You see you can answer a paradox. It's just that the answer is; a. wrong.b. meaningless. Quote
Qfwfq Posted September 22, 2005 Report Posted September 22, 2005 He meant that you can't give a correct answer. And he was also right about the fly and the spider! ;) Before looking at Buffy's answer, I though it was because the crosswalk chewed it!!! ;) Actually, the original meaning of the word 'paradox' is somewhat like double, or contrary, opinion. Many paradoxes are things that have a correct answer but contrary to what might seem obvious, or things that might have two answers according to two different arguments, both correct or both seemingly correct. In some cases both answers may be correct, it only depends on something not being well specified in the question. An example is the paradox known as the Monty Hall problem because of the "Let's Make A Deal" game. The answer considered correct is seemingly against common sense, but is a non-obvious consequence of something that can, in practice, be supposed. If the same thing were false then the more obvious answer would be exactly right. It's a resolvable paradox, but what is the "thing" that the answer depends on? ;) Russel's paradox and Epimenides' are examples of when neither 'yes' nor 'no' makes sense. Quote
goku Posted September 22, 2005 Report Posted September 22, 2005 have you ever wondered why:cargo travels by ships, shipments travel by caryou drive on parkways, park on drivewaysastroids burn in the upper hemishere, hemroids burn on your butt paradox? Quote
goku Posted September 22, 2005 Report Posted September 22, 2005 you'll find these inside a clean nose Quote
CraigD Posted September 23, 2005 Report Posted September 23, 2005 ... How about the grandfather paradox(or grandmother)If you went back in time and killed your grandfather what would happen? well assuming it was before your father/mother was born than you wont be born - then you wont be able to come back and kill him in the future so you will be born...and so onThere’re actually some serious resolutions of this paradox. Rather than clutter this riddle thread with a non-riddle post, I’ve started a new thread for it. Quote
rockytriton Posted September 23, 2005 Report Posted September 23, 2005 what has 300 legs and 4 teeth? Quote
CraigD Posted September 23, 2005 Report Posted September 23, 2005 what has 300 legs and 4 teeth?I grew up in southern West Virginia, where the answer to this was “150 Kentucky hillbillies”. In Kentucky, the answer is “150 West Virginia hillbillies”. Quote
goku Posted September 23, 2005 Report Posted September 23, 2005 ashes to ashes, dust to dustif it wasn't for chevys, our wrenches would rust Quote
rockytriton Posted September 23, 2005 Report Posted September 23, 2005 I grew up in southern West Virginia, where the answer to this was “150 Kentucky hillbillies”. In Kentucky, the answer is “150 West Virginia hillbillies”. Nope, the answer is "The front row of a Willy Nelson Concert". Quote
infamous Posted September 26, 2005 Author Report Posted September 26, 2005 Steven and Mary had five children, (yes five). Half of them are girls, how is this possible? Quote
Jay-qu Posted September 26, 2005 Report Posted September 26, 2005 because there all girls? two friends are chatting:- Peter, how old are your children?- well Thomas, there are three of them and the product of their ages is 36.- Thats not enough...- THe sum of their ages is exactly the numer of beers we have drunk- That is still not enough.- Ok,the last thing is that my oldest son wears a red hat.How many years has each of Peter's children? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.